SSI Rates in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy Without Reconstruction- A Multicenter, Double-blinded RCT.
Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Rates in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy Without Reconstruction, a Comparison Among Those Receiving Preoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics Alone Versus Continued Prophylactic Antibiotics Postoperatively-A Multicenter, Double-blinded Randomized Control Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
384
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Breast cancer is the second most prevalent malignancy in the world and an important component of treatment warrants surgical procedures such as mastectomy. Surgical site infections after breast surgery may range from 1-26%, which is high for surgeries that are considered "clean procedures", as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) wound classification system. Prophylactic antibiotics given before the surgical incision as per Joint Commissions SCIP (Surgical Care Improvement Project) guidelines, have been shown to decrease the rate of postoperative infections in a vast number of patients. There is however, no clear consensus due to lack of evidence on continuation (duration) of prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing mastectomy with indwelling drains, and thus antibiotic prescribing practices may vary among breast as well as reconstructive surgeons. In this trial all patients undergoing mastectomy without immediate reconstruction will receive a single prophylactic dose of preoperative antibiotic, and subsequently, the patients will be randomized to either continue the prophylactic antibiotics or receive a placebo for the duration of indwelling drains. The aim of this trial is to compare the difference in SSI rates between these two study arms as the main outcome. In addition, the factors associated with differing rates of SSI in the intervention and control group will also be identified.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Nov 2020
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 8, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedOctober 8, 2020
October 1, 2020
2.2 years
October 1, 2020
October 6, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
Standard CDC criteria: 1. purulent drainage from the incision or drain site; 2. organisms isolated from an aseptically obtained culture of fluid or tissue; 3. deliberate opening of the incision by a surgeon in patients having either tenderness, localized swelling, redness, or warmth; or 4. diagnosis of SSI by the surgeon or study wound assessor or 5. prescription of therapeutic antibiotics; 6. Patients clinically diagnosed and documented to have cellulitis.
up to 30 days.
Other Outcomes (1)
Rates of antibiotic associated side-effects
will be assessed during the follow-up visits between postoperative days 4-8 days for the 1st postoperative visit and subsequently at each routine postoperative visit while the drain is in place, for a maximum of 30 days.
Study Arms (2)
Intervention Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe intervention arm will be administered, either Cefazolin iv every 8 hours while NPO or cefalexin 500 mg q8 hours per oral if tolerating a diet.
Control
PLACEBO COMPARATORControls will be provided with initially IV placebo while NPO and then with a placebo capsule filled with inert material for the duration of the drains which usually is about 14 days.
Interventions
Cefalexin 500 mg PO q8 hours will be continued for the duration of the indwelling drains which usually is about 14 days.
A placebo capsule filled with inert material for the duration of the drains which usually is about 14 days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Undergo breast reconstruction
- Who have other medical indications for which they must remain on antibiotics for more than the single preoperative dose
- Those with any history of allergies to beta-lactam drug
- Patients who had an open breast or axillary biopsy/breast conservation in the last 30 days on the ipsilateral side.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Aga Khan Universitylead
- Liaquat National Hospital & Medical Collegecollaborator
- Dow University of Health Sciencescollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Dow University of Health Sciences
Karachi, Sindh, 74200, Pakistan
Aga Khan University Hospital
Karachi, Sindh, 7480 0, Pakistan
Liaquat National Hospital
Karachi, Sindh, 74800, Pakistan
Related Publications (20)
Zeeshan S, Ali B, Ahmad K, Chagpar AB, Sattar AK. Clinicopathological Features of Young Versus Older Patients With Breast Cancer at a Single Pakistani Institution and a Comparison With a National US Database. J Glob Oncol. 2019 Mar;5:1-6. doi: 10.1200/JGO.18.00208.
PMID: 30860954BACKGROUNDVilar-Compte D, Jacquemin B, Robles-Vidal C, Volkow P. Surgical site infections in breast surgery: case-control study. World J Surg. 2004 Mar;28(3):242-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-7193-3. Epub 2004 Feb 17.
PMID: 14961196BACKGROUNDThrockmorton AD, Boughey JC, Boostrom SY, Holifield AC, Stobbs MM, Hoskin T, Baddour LM, Degnim AC. Postoperative prophylactic antibiotics and surgical site infection rates in breast surgery patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Sep;16(9):2464-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0542-1. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
PMID: 19506959BACKGROUNDDegnim AC, Scow JS, Hoskin TL, Miller JP, Loprinzi M, Boughey JC, Jakub JW, Throckmorton A, Patel R, Baddour LM. Randomized controlled trial to reduce bacterial colonization of surgical drains after breast and axillary operations. Ann Surg. 2013 Aug;258(2):240-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828c0b85.
PMID: 23518704BACKGROUNDAngarita FA, Acuna SA, Torregrosa L, Tawil M, Escallon J, Ruiz A. Perioperative variables associated with surgical site infection in breast cancer surgery. J Hosp Infect. 2011 Dec;79(4):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
PMID: 22054593BACKGROUNDJones DJ, Bunn F, Bell-Syer SV. Prophylactic antibiotics to prevent surgical site infection after breast cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 9;(3):CD005360. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005360.pub4.
PMID: 24609957BACKGROUNDFelippe WA, Werneck GL, Santoro-Lopes G. Surgical site infection among women discharged with a drain in situ after breast cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2007 Dec;31(12):2293-9; discussion 2300-1. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9248-3.
PMID: 17917771BACKGROUNDGao YX, Xu L, Ye JM, Wang DM, Zhao JX, Zhang LB, Duan XN, Liu YH. Analysis of risk factors of surgical site infections in breast cancer. Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Mar 5;123(5):559-62.
PMID: 20367981BACKGROUNDVilar-Compte D, Rosales S, Hernandez-Mello N, Maafs E, Volkow P. Surveillance, control, and prevention of surgical site infections in breast cancer surgery: a 5-year experience. Am J Infect Control. 2009 Oct;37(8):674-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
PMID: 19556033BACKGROUNDTeija-Kaisa A, Eija M, Marja S, Outi L. Risk factors for surgical site infection in breast surgery. J Clin Nurs. 2013 Apr;22(7-8):948-57. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12009. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
PMID: 23121264BACKGROUNDThomson DR, Sadideen H, Furniss D. Wound drainage after axillary dissection for carcinoma of the breast. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 20;2013(10):CD006823. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006823.pub2.
PMID: 24158902BACKGROUNDRotstein C, Ferguson R, Cummings KM, Piedmonte MR, Lucey J, Banish A. Determinants of clean surgical wound infections for breast procedures at an oncology center. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992 Apr;13(4):207-14. doi: 10.1086/646511.
PMID: 1593101BACKGROUNDRey JE, Gardner SM, Cushing RD. Determinants of surgical site infection after breast biopsy. Am J Infect Control. 2005 Mar;33(2):126-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.05.004.
PMID: 15761414BACKGROUNDBratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK, Fish DN, Napolitano LM, Sawyer RG, Slain D, Steinberg JP, Weinstein RA; American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP); Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA); Surgical Infection Society (SIS); Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2013 Feb;14(1):73-156. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.9999. Epub 2013 Mar 5. No abstract available.
PMID: 23461695BACKGROUNDHedrick TL, Smith PW, Gazoni LM, Sawyer RG. The appropriate use of antibiotics in surgery: a review of surgical infections. Curr Probl Surg. 2007 Oct;44(10):635-75. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2007.06.006. No abstract available.
PMID: 18021817BACKGROUNDEdwards BL, Stukenborg GJ, Brenin DR, Schroen AT. Use of prophylactic postoperative antibiotics during surgical drain presence following mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Oct;21(10):3249-55. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3960-7. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
PMID: 25138078BACKGROUNDWilcox MH, Mooney L, Bendall R, Settle CD, Fawley WN. A case-control study of community-associated Clostridium difficile infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 Aug;62(2):388-96. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn163. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
PMID: 18434341BACKGROUNDWilcox MH, Chalmers JD, Nord CE, Freeman J, Bouza E. Role of cephalosporins in the era of Clostridium difficile infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Jan;72(1):1-18. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw385. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
PMID: 27659735BACKGROUNDThomas C, Stevenson M, Riley TV. Antibiotics and hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea: a systematic review. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 Jun;51(6):1339-50. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg254. Epub 2003 May 13.
PMID: 12746372BACKGROUNDSattar AK, Zahid N, Shahzad H, Soomro R, Saleem O, Mahmood SF. Impact of duration of antibiotic prophylaxis on rates of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing mastectomy without immediate reconstruction, comparing a single prophylactic dose versus continued antibiotic prophylaxis postoperatively: a multicentre, double-blinded randomised control trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 9;11(7):e049572. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049572.
PMID: 34244280DERIVED
Related Links
- An Updated Meta-Analysis on the Effectiveness of Preoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics in Patients Undergoing Breast Surgical Procedures
- National Practice Patterns in Preoperative and Postoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Breast Procedures Requiring Drains: Survey of the American Society of Breast Surgeons
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abida K. Sattar, MD, FACS
Aga Khan University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor and Section Head
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 1, 2020
First Posted
October 8, 2020
Study Start
November 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2022
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
October 8, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No individual participant data will be shared