NCT04576481

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to incorporate behavioral economics (BE) approaches to determine whether 3 novel interventions of varying intensity improve the frequency of parent-child reading behaviors among low-income families. In the first phase, 10 parents will be recruited to participate in rapid cycle interviews to determine the appropriateness of text messages. In the second phase, 45 participants will be randomized to comparative groups to test the effects of automated hovering and other BE approaches on frequency of parent-child shared reading. Investigators long-term goal is to test the effects of these approaches to promote child language and socio-emotional development.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
55

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 25, 2020

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 6, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 17, 2020

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 4, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 4, 2022

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 15, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 15, 2024

Status Verified

September 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

September 25, 2020

Results QC Date

February 21, 2022

Last Update Submit

September 10, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Acceptability Survey

    To determine acceptability, participants will be assessed on their overall satisfaction (5-point Likert scale 1=strong disagree, 2=disagree, 3=not sure, 4=agree and 5= strongly agree) with the study delivery intervention and answered survey questions regarding likes and dislikes concerning the intervention group they received following the intervention period.

    2 months

  • Feasibility of Study

    Percentage of study participants who completed the 2-month follow-up

    2 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Change in Score of Cognitive Stimulation Provided in the Home Measure - (StimQ-Read)

    2 months

  • Change in Score for The Parenting Stress Index - Short Form (PSI-SF)

    2 months

  • Change in Weekly Parent-Child Shared Reading Frequency

    2 months

  • Measure of Child Socio-Emotional Development Using Devereux Early Childhood Assessment (DECA)

    2 months

  • Measure of Child Language Development Using MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory (CDI) - Percentiles

    2 months

Study Arms (3)

Group 1: Texting

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Consist of daily text messages on shared reading

Behavioral: Texting

Group 2: Regret

EXPERIMENTAL

Will consist of Group 1 plus social comparisons.

Behavioral: TextingBehavioral: Regret

Group 3: Lottery

EXPERIMENTAL

Will consist of Group 2 plus availability of a weekly lottery.

Behavioral: TextingBehavioral: RegretBehavioral: Lottery

Interventions

TextingBEHAVIORAL

Text Messages will be sent to participants using Penn's Way to Health Platform. Participants will be asked to reply to daily text messages on daily shared reading activities including the titles of books and time spent reading.

Group 1: TextingGroup 2: RegretGroup 3: Lottery
RegretBEHAVIORAL

Personalized coaching content will be made available to participants through links in the text messages and will provide comparisons of their reading frequency with that of other participants.

Group 2: RegretGroup 3: Lottery
LotteryBEHAVIORAL

Participants who reply to a text message that they read on a particular day will be entered into daily and weekly drawings to receive cash payments.

Group 3: Lottery

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Months - 24 Months
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Parents who:
  • Have an infant aged 6-24 months
  • Have access to a smart phone with text messaging capabilities
  • Have completed an informed consent
  • Children who:
  • Are aged 6-24 months old

You may not qualify if:

  • Parents who:
  • \- Non-English speaking
  • Children who:
  • Were born premature (estimated gestational age \< 35 weeks)
  • Have been diagnosed with congenital malformations or genetic syndromes which place them at risk for developmental delays

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146, United States

Location

Related Publications (25)

  • National Research Council (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development; Shonkoff JP, Phillips DA, editors. From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK225557/

    PMID: 25077268BACKGROUND
  • Rosenberg SA, Zhang D, Robinson CC. Prevalence of developmental delays and participation in early intervention services for young children. Pediatrics. 2008 Jun;121(6):e1503-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1680. Epub 2008 May 26.

    PMID: 18504295BACKGROUND
  • Blair C, Raver CC. Poverty, Stress, and Brain Development: New Directions for Prevention and Intervention. Acad Pediatr. 2016 Apr;16(3 Suppl):S30-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.010.

    PMID: 27044699BACKGROUND
  • The pediatrician's role in development and implementation of an Individual Education Plan (IEP) and/or an Individual Family Service Plan (IFSP). American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Children with Disabilities. Pediatrics. 1999 Jul;104(1 Pt 1):124-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.1.124.

    PMID: 10390275BACKGROUND
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Economic costs associated with mental retardation, cerebral palsy, hearing loss, and vision impairment--United States, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004 Jan 30;53(3):57-9.

    PMID: 14749614BACKGROUND
  • Cates CB, Dreyer BP, Berkule SB, White LJ, Arevalo JA, Mendelsohn AL. Infant communication and subsequent language development in children from low-income families: the role of early cognitive stimulation. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2012 Sep;33(7):577-85. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e318264c10f.

    PMID: 22947884BACKGROUND
  • Hart B, Risley TR. Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes Publishing Company; 1995.

    BACKGROUND
  • Zuckerman B, Augustyn M. Books and reading: evidence-based standard of care whose time has come. Acad Pediatr. 2011 Jan-Feb;11(1):11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.09.007.

    PMID: 21272819BACKGROUND
  • Payne AC, Whitehurst GJ, Angell aL. The role of home literacy environment in the development of language ability in preschool children from low-income families. Early Child Res Q. 1994:427-440.

    BACKGROUND
  • Weinberger J. A longitudinal study of children's early literacy experiences at home and later literacy development at home and school. J Res Reading. 1996;19:14-24.

    BACKGROUND
  • Senechal M, Lefevre J, Thomas EM, Daley KE. Differential effects of home literacy experiences on the development of oral and written language. Reading Res Q. 1998;33:96-116.

    BACKGROUND
  • Jimenez ME, Mendelsohn AL, Lin Y, Shelton P, Reichman N. Early Shared Reading Is Associated with Less Harsh Parenting. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2019 Sep;40(7):530-537. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000687.

    PMID: 31107765BACKGROUND
  • Jimenez ME, Hudson SV, Lima D, Mendelsohn AL, Pellerano M, Crabtree BF. Perspectives on shared reading among a sample of Latino parents. Child Care Health Dev. 2019 Mar;45(2):292-299. doi: 10.1111/cch.12634. Epub 2018 Dec 19.

    PMID: 30471139BACKGROUND
  • Mendelsohn AL, Mogilner LN, Dreyer BP, Forman JA, Weinstein SC, Broderick M, Cheng KJ, Magloire T, Moore T, Napier C. The impact of a clinic-based literacy intervention on language development in inner-city preschool children. Pediatrics. 2001 Jan;107(1):130-4. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.1.130.

    PMID: 11134446BACKGROUND
  • Asch DA, Muller RW, Volpp KG. Automated hovering in health care--watching over the 5000 hours. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 5;367(1):1-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1203869. Epub 2012 Jun 20. No abstract available.

    PMID: 22716935BACKGROUND
  • Whittaker R, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Rodgers A, Gu Y, Dobson R. Mobile phone text messaging and app-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 22;10(10):CD006611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006611.pub5.

    PMID: 31638271BACKGROUND
  • Jacobson Vann JC, Jacobson RM, Coyne-Beasley T, Asafu-Adjei JK, Szilagyi PG. Patient reminder and recall interventions to improve immunization rates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 18;1(1):CD003941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003941.pub3.

    PMID: 29342498BACKGROUND
  • Taveras EM, Marshall R, Sharifi M, Avalon E, Fiechtner L, Horan C, Gerber MW, Orav EJ, Price SN, Sequist T, Slater D. Comparative Effectiveness of Clinical-Community Childhood Obesity Interventions: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Aug 7;171(8):e171325. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1325. Epub 2017 Aug 7.

    PMID: 28586856BACKGROUND
  • Ladley A, Hieger AW, Arthur J, Broom M. Educational Text Messages Decreased Emergency Department Utilization Among Infant Caregivers: A Randomized Trial. Acad Pediatr. 2018 Aug;18(6):636-641. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 9.

    PMID: 29432907BACKGROUND
  • O'Leary ST, Lee M, Lockhart S, et al. Effectiveness and Cost of Bidirectional Text Messaging for Adolescent Vaccines and Well Care. Pediatrics. 2015;136(5):e20151089. Pediatrics. 2016 Sep;138(3):e20161768. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1768. No abstract available.

    PMID: 27581853BACKGROUND
  • NICHD Strategic Plan 2020. NIH Pub Number 19-HD-8091. Bethesda, MD: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development;2019.

    BACKGROUND
  • Dreyer BP, Mendelsohn AL, Tamis-LeMonda CS. Assessing the child's cognitive home environment through parental report: reliability and validity. Early Dev Parent. 1996;5:271-287.

    BACKGROUND
  • Reitman D, Currier RO, Stickle TR. A critical evaluation of the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-SF) in a head start population. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2002 Sep;31(3):384-92. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3103_10.

    PMID: 12149976BACKGROUND
  • Powell G, Mackrain M, LeBuffe P. Devereux Early Childhood Assessment for Infants and Toddlers- Technical Manual. Lewisville, NC: Kaplan Early Learning Corporation;2007.

    BACKGROUND
  • Feldman HM, Dollaghan CA, Campbell TF, Kurs-Lasky M, Janosky JE, Paradise JL. Measurement properties of the MacArthur communicative development inventories at ages one and two years. Child Dev. 2000 Mar-Apr;71(2):310-22. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00146.

    PMID: 10834466BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Literacy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CommunicationBehavior

Limitations and Caveats

* Technical issues with W2H system: Group 2 texts that provided comparisons of participant reading frequency with that of other participant did not work properly for duration of study. * Problem with Measurements leading to lost data: * CDI \& DECA: data lost for participants \>18 mo at follow-up visit * CDI: technical problems with RedCap data collection. Comprehension scores are uninterpretable. Only production scores were used in data analysis.

Results Point of Contact

Title
James Guevara, MD MPH
Organization
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Study Officials

  • James Guevara, MD, MPH

    Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Participants will not be blinded to their treatment assignment. However, research staff will be blinded to treatment assignment when collecting study data.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The intervention consists of 3 intervention groups. Participants will be stratified by site and randomized 1:1:1 to receive one of the 3 AH interventions for an 8-week duration.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2020

First Posted

October 6, 2020

Study Start

November 17, 2020

Primary Completion

February 4, 2022

Study Completion

February 4, 2022

Last Updated

November 15, 2024

Results First Posted

November 15, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

A complete, cleaned, and de-identified dataset will be made available to other investigators after all analyses have been conducted and within twelve months of the end of the final year of funding to allow for publication of all study aims. To obtain this data set, other investigators will need to contact the study Principal Investigator (PI) who will provide a data sharing agreement. The data sharing agreement will permit a deidentified data set to be shared once an Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocol has been approved at the investigators' home institution and the investigators have signed a pledge to not attempt to identify individual study subjects. The data set will be made available on a Compact Disc Read-Only Memory (CD-ROM) or through a secure File Transfer Protocol (FTP) site.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
12 months after the end of the final year of funding.
Access Criteria
REDCap access

Locations