Literacy Promotion Using Automated Hovering
LP
Literary Promotion Using Automated Hovering to Improve Development in Young Low-Income Children
1 other identifier
interventional
55
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to incorporate behavioral economics (BE) approaches to determine whether 3 novel interventions of varying intensity improve the frequency of parent-child reading behaviors among low-income families. In the first phase, 10 parents will be recruited to participate in rapid cycle interviews to determine the appropriateness of text messages. In the second phase, 45 participants will be randomized to comparative groups to test the effects of automated hovering and other BE approaches on frequency of parent-child shared reading. Investigators long-term goal is to test the effects of these approaches to promote child language and socio-emotional development.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 25, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 6, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 17, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 4, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 4, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 15, 2024
CompletedNovember 15, 2024
September 1, 2024
1.2 years
September 25, 2020
February 21, 2022
September 10, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Acceptability Survey
To determine acceptability, participants will be assessed on their overall satisfaction (5-point Likert scale 1=strong disagree, 2=disagree, 3=not sure, 4=agree and 5= strongly agree) with the study delivery intervention and answered survey questions regarding likes and dislikes concerning the intervention group they received following the intervention period.
2 months
Feasibility of Study
Percentage of study participants who completed the 2-month follow-up
2 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in Score of Cognitive Stimulation Provided in the Home Measure - (StimQ-Read)
2 months
Change in Score for The Parenting Stress Index - Short Form (PSI-SF)
2 months
Change in Weekly Parent-Child Shared Reading Frequency
2 months
Measure of Child Socio-Emotional Development Using Devereux Early Childhood Assessment (DECA)
2 months
Measure of Child Language Development Using MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory (CDI) - Percentiles
2 months
Study Arms (3)
Group 1: Texting
ACTIVE COMPARATORConsist of daily text messages on shared reading
Group 2: Regret
EXPERIMENTALWill consist of Group 1 plus social comparisons.
Group 3: Lottery
EXPERIMENTALWill consist of Group 2 plus availability of a weekly lottery.
Interventions
Text Messages will be sent to participants using Penn's Way to Health Platform. Participants will be asked to reply to daily text messages on daily shared reading activities including the titles of books and time spent reading.
Personalized coaching content will be made available to participants through links in the text messages and will provide comparisons of their reading frequency with that of other participants.
Participants who reply to a text message that they read on a particular day will be entered into daily and weekly drawings to receive cash payments.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parents who:
- Have an infant aged 6-24 months
- Have access to a smart phone with text messaging capabilities
- Have completed an informed consent
- Children who:
- Are aged 6-24 months old
You may not qualify if:
- Parents who:
- \- Non-English speaking
- Children who:
- Were born premature (estimated gestational age \< 35 weeks)
- Have been diagnosed with congenital malformations or genetic syndromes which place them at risk for developmental delays
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphialead
- University of Pennsylvaniacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146, United States
Related Publications (25)
National Research Council (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development; Shonkoff JP, Phillips DA, editors. From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK225557/
PMID: 25077268BACKGROUNDRosenberg SA, Zhang D, Robinson CC. Prevalence of developmental delays and participation in early intervention services for young children. Pediatrics. 2008 Jun;121(6):e1503-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1680. Epub 2008 May 26.
PMID: 18504295BACKGROUNDBlair C, Raver CC. Poverty, Stress, and Brain Development: New Directions for Prevention and Intervention. Acad Pediatr. 2016 Apr;16(3 Suppl):S30-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.010.
PMID: 27044699BACKGROUNDThe pediatrician's role in development and implementation of an Individual Education Plan (IEP) and/or an Individual Family Service Plan (IFSP). American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Children with Disabilities. Pediatrics. 1999 Jul;104(1 Pt 1):124-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.1.124.
PMID: 10390275BACKGROUNDCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Economic costs associated with mental retardation, cerebral palsy, hearing loss, and vision impairment--United States, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004 Jan 30;53(3):57-9.
PMID: 14749614BACKGROUNDCates CB, Dreyer BP, Berkule SB, White LJ, Arevalo JA, Mendelsohn AL. Infant communication and subsequent language development in children from low-income families: the role of early cognitive stimulation. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2012 Sep;33(7):577-85. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e318264c10f.
PMID: 22947884BACKGROUNDHart B, Risley TR. Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes Publishing Company; 1995.
BACKGROUNDZuckerman B, Augustyn M. Books and reading: evidence-based standard of care whose time has come. Acad Pediatr. 2011 Jan-Feb;11(1):11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.09.007.
PMID: 21272819BACKGROUNDPayne AC, Whitehurst GJ, Angell aL. The role of home literacy environment in the development of language ability in preschool children from low-income families. Early Child Res Q. 1994:427-440.
BACKGROUNDWeinberger J. A longitudinal study of children's early literacy experiences at home and later literacy development at home and school. J Res Reading. 1996;19:14-24.
BACKGROUNDSenechal M, Lefevre J, Thomas EM, Daley KE. Differential effects of home literacy experiences on the development of oral and written language. Reading Res Q. 1998;33:96-116.
BACKGROUNDJimenez ME, Mendelsohn AL, Lin Y, Shelton P, Reichman N. Early Shared Reading Is Associated with Less Harsh Parenting. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2019 Sep;40(7):530-537. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000687.
PMID: 31107765BACKGROUNDJimenez ME, Hudson SV, Lima D, Mendelsohn AL, Pellerano M, Crabtree BF. Perspectives on shared reading among a sample of Latino parents. Child Care Health Dev. 2019 Mar;45(2):292-299. doi: 10.1111/cch.12634. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
PMID: 30471139BACKGROUNDMendelsohn AL, Mogilner LN, Dreyer BP, Forman JA, Weinstein SC, Broderick M, Cheng KJ, Magloire T, Moore T, Napier C. The impact of a clinic-based literacy intervention on language development in inner-city preschool children. Pediatrics. 2001 Jan;107(1):130-4. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.1.130.
PMID: 11134446BACKGROUNDAsch DA, Muller RW, Volpp KG. Automated hovering in health care--watching over the 5000 hours. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 5;367(1):1-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1203869. Epub 2012 Jun 20. No abstract available.
PMID: 22716935BACKGROUNDWhittaker R, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Rodgers A, Gu Y, Dobson R. Mobile phone text messaging and app-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 22;10(10):CD006611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006611.pub5.
PMID: 31638271BACKGROUNDJacobson Vann JC, Jacobson RM, Coyne-Beasley T, Asafu-Adjei JK, Szilagyi PG. Patient reminder and recall interventions to improve immunization rates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 18;1(1):CD003941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003941.pub3.
PMID: 29342498BACKGROUNDTaveras EM, Marshall R, Sharifi M, Avalon E, Fiechtner L, Horan C, Gerber MW, Orav EJ, Price SN, Sequist T, Slater D. Comparative Effectiveness of Clinical-Community Childhood Obesity Interventions: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Aug 7;171(8):e171325. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1325. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
PMID: 28586856BACKGROUNDLadley A, Hieger AW, Arthur J, Broom M. Educational Text Messages Decreased Emergency Department Utilization Among Infant Caregivers: A Randomized Trial. Acad Pediatr. 2018 Aug;18(6):636-641. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
PMID: 29432907BACKGROUNDO'Leary ST, Lee M, Lockhart S, et al. Effectiveness and Cost of Bidirectional Text Messaging for Adolescent Vaccines and Well Care. Pediatrics. 2015;136(5):e20151089. Pediatrics. 2016 Sep;138(3):e20161768. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1768. No abstract available.
PMID: 27581853BACKGROUNDNICHD Strategic Plan 2020. NIH Pub Number 19-HD-8091. Bethesda, MD: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development;2019.
BACKGROUNDDreyer BP, Mendelsohn AL, Tamis-LeMonda CS. Assessing the child's cognitive home environment through parental report: reliability and validity. Early Dev Parent. 1996;5:271-287.
BACKGROUNDReitman D, Currier RO, Stickle TR. A critical evaluation of the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-SF) in a head start population. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2002 Sep;31(3):384-92. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3103_10.
PMID: 12149976BACKGROUNDPowell G, Mackrain M, LeBuffe P. Devereux Early Childhood Assessment for Infants and Toddlers- Technical Manual. Lewisville, NC: Kaplan Early Learning Corporation;2007.
BACKGROUNDFeldman HM, Dollaghan CA, Campbell TF, Kurs-Lasky M, Janosky JE, Paradise JL. Measurement properties of the MacArthur communicative development inventories at ages one and two years. Child Dev. 2000 Mar-Apr;71(2):310-22. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00146.
PMID: 10834466BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
* Technical issues with W2H system: Group 2 texts that provided comparisons of participant reading frequency with that of other participant did not work properly for duration of study. * Problem with Measurements leading to lost data: * CDI \& DECA: data lost for participants \>18 mo at follow-up visit * CDI: technical problems with RedCap data collection. Comprehension scores are uninterpretable. Only production scores were used in data analysis.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- James Guevara, MD MPH
- Organization
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James Guevara, MD, MPH
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants will not be blinded to their treatment assignment. However, research staff will be blinded to treatment assignment when collecting study data.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2020
First Posted
October 6, 2020
Study Start
November 17, 2020
Primary Completion
February 4, 2022
Study Completion
February 4, 2022
Last Updated
November 15, 2024
Results First Posted
November 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- 12 months after the end of the final year of funding.
- Access Criteria
- REDCap access
A complete, cleaned, and de-identified dataset will be made available to other investigators after all analyses have been conducted and within twelve months of the end of the final year of funding to allow for publication of all study aims. To obtain this data set, other investigators will need to contact the study Principal Investigator (PI) who will provide a data sharing agreement. The data sharing agreement will permit a deidentified data set to be shared once an Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocol has been approved at the investigators' home institution and the investigators have signed a pledge to not attempt to identify individual study subjects. The data set will be made available on a Compact Disc Read-Only Memory (CD-ROM) or through a secure File Transfer Protocol (FTP) site.