Dry Needling and Maitland Joint Mobilization Techniques in Patients With Myofacial Chronic Neck Pain
Comparison Between Dry Needling and Maitland Joint Mobilization Techniques in Patients With Myofacial Chronic Neck Pain
2 other identifiers
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of my research is to compare the effects of dry needling and Maitland mobilization in chronic myofacial neck pain
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 25, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2020
CompletedSeptember 29, 2020
September 1, 2020
9 months
September 25, 2020
September 25, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Numeric Pain Rating Scale NPRS
The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a subjective measure in which individuals rate their pain on an eleven-point numerical scale. The scale is composed of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
4 months
Range of Motion
Standard Goniometer will be used.Higher score shows improvement.
4 months
Disability
Scoring: For each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0, if the last statement is marked it = 5. If all ten sections are completed the score is calculated as follows: Example:16 (total scored) 50 (total possible score) x 100 = 32% If one section is missed or not applicable the score is calculated: 16 (total scored) 45 (total possible score) x 100 = 35.5% Minimum Detectable Change (90% confidence): 5 points or 10 %points
4 months
Study Arms (2)
Dry Needling-Group
EXPERIMENTALTens, Stretching, Strengthening(girdle), Neck Isometrics, DN
Maitland-Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORTens Stretching, Strengthening(girdle), Neck Isometrics, Maitland joint mobilization
Interventions
TENS 10 minutes, Stretching, Strengthening(girdle),Neck Isometrics, DN
TENS 10 minutes, Stretching, Strengthening(girdle),Neck Isometrics, Maitland joint mobilization
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Bilateral pain involving the upper trapezius and elevator muscle of the scapula;
- Duration of pain of at least 3 months;
- A pain intensity corresponding to at least 20 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS)
- Neck pain with symptoms provoked by either neck postures or neck movement;
- Pain localized at least in the cervical and occipital regions but not in the orofacial region;
- Neck disability index (NDI) greater than or equal to 15 points;
- Restricted cervical range of movements (flexion, extension, rotation, and sidebending); (i) Presence of bilateral MTrPs in upper trapezius and levator scapulae muscles
You may not qualify if:
- Any signs, symptoms, or history of the following diseases:
- Orofacial pain and temporo-mandibular disorders
- A history of traumatic injuries (e.g., contusion, fracture, and whiplash injury);
- Systemic diseases such as fibromyalgia, systemic erythematous lupus, and arthritis; (d) Neurologic disorders (e.g., trigeminal neuralgia or occipital neuralgia);
- Concomitant medical diagnosis of any primary headache (tension type or migraine);
- Unilateral neck pain;
- Cervical spine surgery;
- Clinical diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy;
- Needle phobia;
- History of previous physical therapy intervention for the cervical region in last 6 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Riphah IU
Lahore, 54000, Pakistan
Related Publications (8)
Gross A, Miller J, D'Sylva J, Burnie SJ, Goldsmith CH, Graham N, Haines T, Bronfort G, Hoving JL. Manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD004249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004249.pub3.
PMID: 20091561BACKGROUNDDavidoff RA. Trigger points and myofascial pain: toward understanding how they affect headaches. Cephalalgia. 1998 Sep;18(7):436-48. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1998.1807436.x.
PMID: 9793695BACKGROUNDBorg-Stein J, Simons DG. Focused review: myofascial pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Mar;83(3 Suppl 1):S40-7, S48-9. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.32155.
PMID: 11973695BACKGROUNDCampa-Moran I, Rey-Gudin E, Fernandez-Carnero J, Paris-Alemany A, Gil-Martinez A, Lerma Lara S, Prieto-Baquero A, Alonso-Perez JL, La Touche R. Comparison of Dry Needling versus Orthopedic Manual Therapy in Patients with Myofascial Chronic Neck Pain: A Single-Blind, Randomized Pilot Study. Pain Res Treat. 2015;2015:327307. doi: 10.1155/2015/327307. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
PMID: 26640708BACKGROUNDBlanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, Devaney LL, Clewley D, Walton DM, Sparks C, Robertson EK. Neck Pain: Revision 2017. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jul;47(7):A1-A83. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.0302.
PMID: 28666405BACKGROUNDDunning J, Butts R, Mourad F, Young I, Flannagan S, Perreault T. Dry needling: a literature review with implications for clinical practice guidelines. Phys Ther Rev. 2014 Aug;19(4):252-265. doi: 10.1179/108331913X13844245102034.
PMID: 25143704BACKGROUNDGraff-Radford SB, Reeves JL, Jaeger B. Management of chronic head and neck pain: effectiveness of altering factors perpetuating myofascial pain. Headache. 1987 Apr;27(4):186-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1987.hed2704186.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 3597072BACKGROUNDTekin L, Akarsu S, Durmus O, Cakar E, Dincer U, Kiralp MZ. The effect of dry needling in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Mar;32(3):309-15. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-2112-3. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
PMID: 23138883BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maryam Shabbir, PHD
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2020
First Posted
September 29, 2020
Study Start
September 15, 2019
Primary Completion
June 20, 2020
Study Completion
June 28, 2020
Last Updated
September 29, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share