NCT04566835

Brief Summary

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the effect of the education program (HPPCA - Health Promotion Program for Children with Asthma), which was developed by using cartoons and comic based on the health promotion model of Nola J Pender and brain-based learning theories, on disease control and life quality in children aged between 7 and 11, and diagnosed with asthma. Materials and Methods: The sample of the study consisted of 74 children between the ages of 7 and 11, who presented to a respiratory disease unit of a university hospital in Istanbul. Children were randomly assigned to the experimental (38 children) and control (36 children) groups using the Urn method. It was administered to both groups prior to the intervention. After the HPPCA education administered only to the experimental group, both groups were administered two post-tests as a follow-up in the 1st and 3rd months. Standardized sociodemographic question form, Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ) were used for the follow-up. The data were evaluated using statistical parametric tests.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
74

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 21, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 8, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 16, 2020

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 28, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

June 29, 2021

Status Verified

June 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

September 16, 2020

Last Update Submit

June 24, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

pediatric asthmaquality of life in children with asthmacartoon education in asthmaasthma management education

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire - PAQLQ

    The questionnaire has three sub-dimensions, which are symptoms, activity limitation and emotional function. The items related to the "Symptoms" sub-dimension are the items 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20 and 23. The items 1, 2, 3, 19 and 22 are related to the "Activity Limitation" sub-dimension. Finally, the items 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17 and 21 are related to the "Emotional Function" sub-dimension. While applying the questionnaire, the child should be alone. In the questionnaire, the value of each question is between 1 and 7 points, and the score weights of the questions are equal. The lowest score that could be obtained from the scale is 23, and the highest score is 161. The scores of all sub-categories are added together and the mean scores are calculated. Higher score indicates better quality of life

    Pre Test

  • Childhood Asthma Control Test

    The scale consists of two parts. The 4 questions asked in the first part are in VAS (visual analogue scale) type, and have 4 pictorial options. These questions are asked directly to the child and scored between 0 and 3. The remaining 3 questions are 6-Point Likert-type questions. They are reversely scored, from 5 to 0. This part has to be filled out by the parent. A score between 0 and 27 can be obtained on the scale. The cut-off point for the scale is 19. A score of 19 points or less obtained from the scale indicates that the asthma is not under control of the child.

    Pre Test

  • Childhood Asthma Control Test-Change from Pre Test on first month

    The scale consists of two parts. The 4 questions asked in the first part are in VAS (visual analogue scale) type, and have 4 pictorial options. These questions are asked directly to the child and scored between 0 and 3. The remaining 3 questions are 6-Point Likert-type questions. They are reversely scored, from 5 to 0. This part has to be filled out by the parent. A score between 0 and 27 can be obtained on the scale. The cut-off point for the scale is 19. A score of 19 points or less obtained from the scale indicates that the asthma is not under control of the child.

    1st month

  • Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire - Change from Pre Test on first month

    The questionnaire has three sub-dimensions, which are symptoms, activity limitation and emotional function. The items related to the "Symptoms" sub-dimension are the items 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20 and 23. The items 1, 2, 3, 19 and 22 are related to the "Activity Limitation" sub-dimension. Finally, the items 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17 and 21 are related to the "Emotional Function" sub-dimension. While applying the questionnaire, the child should be alone. In the questionnaire, the value of each question is between 1 and 7 points, and the score weights of the questions are equal. The lowest score that could be obtained from the scale is 23, and the highest score is 161. The scores of all sub-categories are added together and the mean scores are calculated. Higher score indicates better quality of life

    1st month

  • Childhood Asthma Control Test-Change from pretest, first month and fourth month

    The scale consists of two parts. The 4 questions asked in the first part are in VAS (visual analogue scale) type, and have 4 pictorial options. These questions are asked directly to the child and scored between 0 and 3. The remaining 3 questions are 6-Point Likert-type questions. They are reversely scored, from 5 to 0. This part has to be filled out by the parent. A score between 0 and 27 can be obtained on the scale. The cut-off point for the scale is 19. A score of 19 points or less obtained from the scale indicates that the asthma is not under control of the child.

    4th month

  • Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire - Change from pretest, first month and fourth month

    The questionnaire has three sub-dimensions, which are symptoms, activity limitation and emotional function. The items related to the "Symptoms" sub-dimension are the items 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20 and 23. The items 1, 2, 3, 19 and 22 are related to the "Activity Limitation" sub-dimension. Finally, the items 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17 and 21 are related to the "Emotional Function" sub-dimension. While applying the questionnaire, the child should be alone. In the questionnaire, the value of each question is between 1 and 7 points, and the score weights of the questions are equal. The lowest score that could be obtained from the scale is 23, and the highest score is 161. The scores of all sub-categories are added together and the mean scores are calculated. Higher score indicates better quality of life

    4th month

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Number of School absenteeism

    Pre Test

  • Number of Hospital Visits

    Pre Test

  • Number of School absenteeism -Change from Pre Test on first month

    1st month

  • Number of Hospital Visits -Change from Pre Test on first month

    1st month

  • Number of School absenteeism -Change from pretest to first month and fourth month

    4th month

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Education Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Taking the Health Promotion Program with cartoons and comics for Children with Asthma

Other: Standart Care given during normal examinationBehavioral: Health Promotion Program with cartoon education for Children with Asthma

Control Group

OTHER

Taking standart care

Other: Standart Care given during normal examination

Interventions

This is the standart education given by doctor. The child and his/her parents come to the doctor for normal examination. They take their asthma diagnosis or other information about their condition. and then the doctor explain them about what is asthma, what are the drugs or how should they use them. This is the implementation using for the control group.

Control GroupEducation Group

First of all, the child and their parents take the routine examination as the same as the control group. Then they take the experimental education called Health Promotion Program with cartoon education for Children with Asthma. The children with asthma were educated within the scope of the program in order to demonstrate the effect of the program on asthma management. Children with asthma were educated with the program, which consisted of 4 units, each of 10 minutes, prepared in the light of the literature and with the current guidelines. Each child received the education in a total of 40 minutes. Every unit has its own cartoon video and comic book material. To sum up The Principal Investigator first give the education about asthma management, then makes them watch the Iggy and the Inhalers videos developed for each unit, and does a colouring activity with comic books at the end of each unit.

Education Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age7 Years - 11 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosed with chronic allergic asthma,
  • Did not have any communication problems,
  • Volunteered to participate in the study,
  • Were not in the active attack period (2 weeks are sufficient if there is an attack history),
  • Were allergic to substances other than pollen or had no allergies
  • Were included in the study after obtaining the informed consent form from their legal guardians.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Koc University

Istanbul, Zeytinburnu, 34010, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (45)

  • Abadoğlu, Ö., Başyiğit, İ., Bavbek, S., Bayındır, Ü., Bayram, H., Bingöl, G., . . . Yüksel, H. (2016). Türk Toraks Derneğİ Astim Tani ve Tedavİ Rehberİ. Official Journal of the Turkish Thoracic Society(17).

    BACKGROUND
  • Akdeniz, E., & Öncel, S. (2019). Türkiye'de Hemşirelik Alanında Astımlı Çocuklarla İlgili Yapılan Lisansüstü Tezlerin İncelenmesi. Turkiye Klinikleri Hemsirelik Bilimleri, 11(2).

    BACKGROUND
  • Aktan, Z. D., Berk, H., Erdoğan, F., & Öktem, S. (2019). Relationship Between Serum IgE Level and Anxiety, Depression, Somatization and Quality of Life in Pediatric Asthma. Current Approaches in Psychiatry/Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar, 11.

    BACKGROUND
  • Al, S., & Özcebe, H. (2017). Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu Kayıtlarında 0-18 Yaş Aralığı İçin Astım Hastalığının Analizi. Sosyal Güvence Dergisi, 6(12), 32.

    BACKGROUND
  • Alkan, H. Ö. (2016). Hasta Eğitimi ve Davranış Değişikliği Geliştirme. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 7(Sup 2), 41-47.

    BACKGROUND
  • Bozkurt, G., & Yıldız, S. (2004). Astımlı Okul Çocuklarına Hastalığın Yönetimi Konusunda Verilen Eğitimin Yaşam Kalitelerine Etkisi. İstanbul Üniversitesi F.N.H.Y.O. Dergisi, 13(53), 101-113.

    BACKGROUND
  • Çoruhlu, T. Ş., Nas, S. E., & Keleş, E. J. A. Ü. E. F. D. (2016). Beyin Temelli Öğrenme Yaklaşımına Dayalı Web Destekli Öğretim Materyalinin Etkililiğinin Değerlendirilmesi: Işık ve Ses Ünitesi. 5(1), 104-132.

    BACKGROUND
  • Çövener, Ç. (2012). Tip 1 Diyabet Yönetiminde Sağlığı Geliştirme Modeli ve Tam öğrenme Kuramına Dayalı Eğitimin Etkisi. (Doctoral Doctoral). Marmara University, Istanbul.

    BACKGROUND
  • Demirbaş, B. C., Çekiç, Ş., Canıtez, Y., & Sapan, N. (2017). Okul çağındaki astımlı olguların çocukluk çağı astım kontrol testi ile değerlendirilmesi. Güncel Pediatri, 15(3), 11-16.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hockenberry, M. J., & Wilson, D. (2018). Wong's nursing care of infants and children-E-book: Elsevier Health Sciences.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hsu, J., Sicrar, K., Herman, E., & Garbe, P. (2018). EXHALE: A Technical Package to Control Asthma

    BACKGROUND
  • Kanık, E. A., Taşdelen, B., & Erdoğan, S. (2011). Klinik denemelerde randomizasyon.

    BACKGROUND
  • Karadağ, A., Çalışkan, N., & Baykara, Z. G. (2017). Hemşirelik Teorileri ve Modelleri (Vol. Baskı 1). İstanbul: Akademi Basın ve Yayıncılık

    BACKGROUND
  • Tan NC, Chen Z, Soo WF, Ngoh AS, Tai BC. Effects of a written asthma action plan on caregivers' management of children with asthma: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Jun;22(2):188-94. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00040.

    PMID: 23616054BACKGROUND
  • Abdelsalam, S. (2017). Outcome of Self-Management Training On Quality Of Life And Self-Efficacy In Patients With Bronchial Asthma. 6.

    RESULT
  • Beller EM, Gebski V, Keech AC. Randomisation in clinical trials. Med J Aust. 2002 Nov 18;177(10):565-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04955.x. No abstract available.

  • Brown S, Lehr VT, French N, Giuliano CA. Can a Short Video Improve Inhaler Use in Urban Youth? J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jul-Aug;22(4):293-299. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-22.4.293.

  • Butz A, Pham L, Lewis L, Lewis C, Hill K, Walker J, Winkelstein M. Rural children with asthma: impact of a parent and child asthma education program. J Asthma. 2005 Dec;42(10):813-21. doi: 10.1080/02770900500369850.

  • Cicutto L, To T, Murphy S. A randomized controlled trial of a public health nurse-delivered asthma program to elementary schools. J Sch Health. 2013 Dec;83(12):876-84. doi: 10.1111/josh.12106.

  • Çinar, S. (2015). Effect of educational on symptom control and quality of life on asthmatic patients

    RESULT
  • Clark NM, Shah S, Dodge JA, Thomas LJ, Andridge RR, Little RJ. An evaluation of asthma interventions for preteen students. J Sch Health. 2010 Feb;80(2):80-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00469.x.

  • George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step BysStep: A Simple Guide and Reference

    RESULT
  • Gerald LB, McClure LA, Mangan JM, Harrington KF, Gibson L, Erwin S, Atchison J, Grad R. Increasing adherence to inhaled steroid therapy among schoolchildren: randomized, controlled trial of school-based supervised asthma therapy. Pediatrics. 2009 Feb;123(2):466-74. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0499.

  • Gulla KM, Kabra SK. Peak Expiratory Flow Rate as a Monitoring Tool in Asthma. Indian J Pediatr. 2017 Aug;84(8):573-574. doi: 10.1007/s12098-017-2398-x. Epub 2017 Jun 14. No abstract available.

  • Jaudes, P. K., Bilaver, L. A., & Champagne, V. (2015). Do children in foster care receive appropriate treatment for asthma? Children and Youth Services Review, 52, 103-109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.03.004

    RESULT
  • Julian V, Amat F, Petit I, Pereira B, Fauquert JL, Heraud MC, Labbe G, Labbe A. Impact of a short early therapeutic education program on the quality of life of asthmatic children and their families. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015 Mar;50(3):213-221. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23013. Epub 2014 Feb 24.

  • Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Ferrie PJ, Griffith LE, Townsend M. Measuring quality of life in children with asthma. Qual Life Res. 1996 Feb;5(1):35-46. doi: 10.1007/BF00435967.

  • King TL, Kho EK, Tiong YH, Julaihi SN. Comparison of effectiveness and time-efficiency between multimedia and conventional counselling on metered-dose inhaler technique education. Singapore Med J. 2015 Feb;56(2):103-8. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2015024.

  • Kocaaslan, E. N. (2016a). Astımlı çocuklarda hastalık yönetimi konusunda verilen eğitimin çocukların yaşam kalitesi ve öz etkililik düzeylerkine etkisi. Trakya Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü

    RESULT
  • Li Z, Leite WL, Thompson LA, Gross HE, Shenkman EA, Reeve BB, DeWalt DA, Huang IC. Determinants of longitudinal health-related quality-of-life change in children with asthma from low-income families: a report from the PROMIS(R) Pediatric Asthma Study. Clin Exp Allergy. 2017 Mar;47(3):383-394. doi: 10.1111/cea.12827. Epub 2016 Oct 21.

  • Liu AH, Zeiger R, Sorkness C, Mahr T, Ostrom N, Burgess S, Rosenzweig JC, Manjunath R. Development and cross-sectional validation of the Childhood Asthma Control Test. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Apr;119(4):817-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.12.662. Epub 2007 Mar 13.

  • Liu PC, Kieckhefer GM, Gau BS. A systematic review of the association between obesity and asthma in children. J Adv Nurs. 2013 Jul;69(7):1446-65. doi: 10.1111/jan.12129. Epub 2013 Apr 8.

  • McClure N, Seibert M, Johnson T, Kannenberg L, Brown T, Lutenbacher M. Improving Asthma Management in the Elementary School Setting: An Education and Self-management Pilot Project. J Pediatr Nurs. 2018 Sep-Oct;42:16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

  • McGhan SL, Wong E, Sharpe HM, Hessel PA, Mandhane P, Boechler VL, Majaesic C, Befus AD. A children's asthma education program: Roaring Adventures of Puff (RAP), improves quality of life. Can Respir J. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):67-73. doi: 10.1155/2010/327650.

  • Mickel CF, Shanovich KK, Evans MD, Jackson DJ. Evaluation of a School-Based Asthma Education Protocol. J Sch Nurs. 2017 Jun;33(3):189-197. doi: 10.1177/1059840516659912. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

  • Korta Murua J, Valverde Molina J, Praena Crespo M, Figuerola Mulet J, Rodriguez Fernandez-Oliva CR, Rueda Esteban S, Neira Rodriguez A, Vazquez Cordero C, Martinez Gomez M, Roman Pinana JM. [Therapeutic education in asthma management]. An Pediatr (Barc). 2007 May;66(5):496-517. doi: 10.1157/13102515. Spanish.

  • National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR-3): Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma-Summary Report 2007. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Nov;120(5 Suppl):S94-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.09.043.

  • Ochoa Sangrador C, Vazquez Blanco A. Day-care center attendance and risk of Asthma-A systematic review. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2018 Nov-Dec;46(6):578-584. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Jul 7.

  • Rosenberger, W. F., & Lachin, J. M. (2015). Randomization in clinical trials: theory and practice: John Wiley & Sons

    RESULT
  • Saleh ASEM. School asthma intervention programme effectively improved children's knowledge and attitudes, and led to decreased hospital admission, length of stay and school absences. Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Jul;23(3):92. doi: 10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103092. Epub 2019 Aug 19. No abstract available.

  • Sekerel BE, Soyer OU, Keskin O, Uzuner N, Yazicioglu M, Kilic M, Artac H, Ozmen S, Can D, Zeyrek D, Cokugras H, Canitez Y, Aydogan M, Kuyucu S, Inal A, Gurkan F, Orhan F, Yilmaz O, Boz AB, Tahan F, Cevit O. The reliability and validity of Turkish version of Childhood Asthma Control Test. Qual Life Res. 2012 May;21(4):685-90. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9970-z. Epub 2011 Jul 27.

  • Somashekar AR, Ramakrishnan KG. Evaluation of Asthma Control in Children Using Childhood- Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire (ATAQ). Indian Pediatr. 2017 Sep 15;54(9):746-748. doi: 10.1007/s13312-017-1167-2.

  • Szefler SJ, Cloutier MM, Villarreal M, Hollenbach JP, Gleason M, Haas-Howard C, Vinick C, Calatroni A, Cicutto L, White M, Williams S, McGinn M, Langton C, Shocks D, Mitchell H, Stempel DA. Building Bridges for Asthma Care: Reducing school absence for inner-city children with health disparities. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Feb;143(2):746-754.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.05.041. Epub 2018 Jul 25.

  • Tabachnick, B., Fidell, L., Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th New International ed.). Essex: Pearson, 235, 284.

    RESULT
  • Walter H, Sadeque-Iqbal F, Ulysse R, Castillo D, Fitzpatrick A, Singleton J. Effectiveness of school-based family asthma educational programs in quality of life and asthma exacerbations in asthmatic children aged five to 18: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Nov;14(11):113-138. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003181.

Related Links

Study Officials

  • Ayse F Ocakci, Professor

    Advisor

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
Assignment to the experimental and control groups was made by a person independent of the researcher. Two balls in different colours, red and white, were placed in a black bag. Assignment to the experimental and control groups was performed by randomly selecting the balls. The following steps: Step 0: the first child selected the white ball and was included in the experimental group. Step 1: a ball was selected randomly. Step 2: The child was assigned to the experimental group (E) if the ball was white, and to the control group (C) if the ball was red. Step 3: A ball in the opposite colour of the selected ball was thrown into the bag (For instance; if the selected ball was red, a white ball was thrown into the bag). Step 4: The process was repeated starting from Step 1. The researcher and the subjects did not know which subjects would fall into which group until the intervention was administered. In this way, the possible bias was prevented.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator, Faculty Member in Bahcesehir University School of Health Science

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2020

First Posted

September 28, 2020

Study Start

December 21, 2019

Primary Completion

May 1, 2020

Study Completion

July 8, 2020

Last Updated

June 29, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The investigators took an informed consent form from parents and declared that never share any personal information about the participants.

Locations