NCT04562233

Brief Summary

The goal of the study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of a supervised, online-delivered, individualized, physical activity program in a sample of post-active treatment breast cancer survivors. The proposed intervention will use a 2-arm randomized controlled trial study design to compare a 12-week resistance-based physical activity program to an attention control (i.e., printed individualized physical activity program) group on feasibility, acceptability and changes in strength as measured by 10 repetition maximum (10RM). Both groups will wear accelerometers. The main hypothesis is that participants randomized to the intervention arm will rate the online-delivered physical activity program as feasible and acceptable compared to attention control participants. The overall rationale is that delivering a physical activity intervention online may increase uptake of the intervention, which may lead to maintained physical activity behavior and associated health benefits. The primary outcomes are feasibility as measured by participant retention and acceptability as measured by adherence to physical activity program (recorded by physical activity log). Secondary outcomes include changes in strength as measured by 10RM, objectively measured physical activity levels as measured by the accelerometer, satisfaction, physical functioning and health-related quality of life. Additionally, a select number of participants will be invited for an interview to talk about their experiences in the program, motivation and barriers to exercise. Interview description: Participants will complete one-on-one interviews with the PI or research staff over videoconferencing software (Rutgers Zoom). The interview will be 45 to 60 minutes in duration and audio recorded using the "record meeting" function. Prior to the interview, participants will consent to being audio recorded. The recording will be stored on Box (a HIPAA compliant cloud drive). A transcript of the audio will be generated using the "audio transcript" function on Rutgers Zoom and transcribed by a third party to ensure accuracy.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
56

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable breast-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 18, 2020

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 24, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2020

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 24, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 24, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

October 13, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

September 18, 2020

Last Update Submit

October 11, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

onlinebreast cancerphysical activitybreast neoplasmresistance exercisesurvivor

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Feasibility (participant retention)

    Participant retention at assessment timepoints (attendance and completing assessments)

    14 weeks including pre-intervention and post-intervention questionnaire completion

  • Acceptability (program adherence)

    Adherence to physical activity program/intervention (attendance and exercise logs)

    12 weeks to complete the intervention

  • Internet Evaluation and Utility Questionnaire

    Satisfaction will be measured as participants' experience and perceptions of an internet intervention. Scale values: Not at all, slightly, somewhat, mostly \& very. Higher scores are associated with a greater level of satisfaction.

    After the 12 week intervention and captured in follow-up questionnaire for intervention arm participants

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • 10 Repetition Maximum Test

    During the baseline assessment, week 12 assessment and week 24 follow up assessment

  • Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire

    During the baseline assessment, week 12 assessment and week 24 follow up assessment

  • Accelerometer (ActiGraph)

    Prior to intervention start and following the Week 12 and week 24 assessments

  • Senior Fitness Test

    During the baseline assessment, week 12 assessment and week 24 follow up assessment

  • Exercise Self-Efficacy Questionnaire

    During the baseline assessment, week 12 assessment and week 24 follow up assessment

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will engage in 12, weekly, supervised, exercise sessions using Zoom with the exercise trainer. Once a week, the exercise trainer and participant will each log on to Zoom from their locations to begin the supervised exercise session. The exercise trainer will record all sessions. Sessions will be 30 to 45 minutes long and be structured as follows: review of previous session and an opportunity to ask questions; 5-minute warm-up; 20- to 25-minute workout; 5- to10-minute cool down and reminder of next session and/or data collection time period. Supervised sessions will be scheduled once a week over the 12-week intervention. Participants will be expected to complete their resistance-based physical activity program for an additional 1-2 days a week as per the intervention schedule to meet as physical activity guidelines. The exercise trainer will track participant attendance. During the session, participants must have another person in the same location in case of an emergency.

Behavioral: Online-delivered physical activity intervention.

Control Arm

OTHER

The attention control arm will include a printed, individualized resistance-based physical activity program. Participants randomized to the control arm will be given a printed or digital individualized, resistance-based physical activity program and told to aim to for three exercise sessions per week. Control participants will follow the same measurement schedule as intervention participants.

Behavioral: Printed, individualized resistance-based physical activity program.

Interventions

Participants randomized to the intervention arm will engage in 12, weekly, supervised, exercise sessions using Zoom with the exercise trainer.

Intervention arm

Without the supervision of an exercise trainer, participants will be given a printed, individualized resistance-based physical activity program to complete over the course of 12 weeks.

Control Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • aged 18 years and older
  • self-identify as Black or African American or Afro-Latina/e
  • a confirmed diagnosed of breast cancer \< 10 years prior to study start
  • does not have a concurrent cancer diagnosis
  • have completed active treatment \> 6 months prior to study commencement (hormonal therapy is acceptable)
  • who are inactive, defined as engaging in \< 30 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day for 3 days per week
  • are able to exercise safely as per physical activity safety screening questionnaire, Get Active Questionnaire
  • read and understand English
  • h) have regular access to an internet-connected device with a video camera.

You may not qualify if:

  • respiratory, joint, or cardiovascular problems precluding physical activity as per physical activity safety screening questionnaire
  • metastatic disease
  • planned elective surgery during the duration of the intervention and/or follow-up that would interfere with participation (e.g., breast reconstruction surgery)
  • does not have someone to supervise them while they exercised remotely.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey

New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901, United States

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Ritterband LM, Bailey ET, Thorndike FP, Lord HR, Farrell-Carnahan L, Baum LD. Initial evaluation of an Internet intervention to improve the sleep of cancer survivors with insomnia. Psychooncology. 2012 Jul;21(7):695-705. doi: 10.1002/pon.1969. Epub 2011 Apr 29.

    PMID: 21538678BACKGROUND
  • Amireault S, Godin G, Lacombe J, Sabiston CM. The use of the Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire in oncology research: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Aug 12;15:60. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0045-7.

    PMID: 26264621BACKGROUND
  • Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, Bonomi AE, Tulsky DS, Lloyd SR, Deasy S, Cobleigh M, Shiomoto G. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Mar;15(3):974-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.3.974.

    PMID: 9060536BACKGROUND
  • Resnick B, Jenkins LS. Testing the reliability and validity of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise scale. Nurs Res. 2000 May-Jun;49(3):154-9. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200005000-00007.

    PMID: 10882320BACKGROUND
  • McAuley E. Self-efficacy and the maintenance of exercise participation in older adults. J Behav Med. 1993 Feb;16(1):103-13. doi: 10.1007/BF00844757.

    PMID: 8433355BACKGROUND
  • Get Active Questionnaire. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Society of Exercise Physiology, 2016.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hilgart M, Ritterband L, Baxter K, Alfano A, Ratliff C, Kinzie M, Cohn W, Whaley D, Lord H, Garber S. Development and perceived utility and impact of a skin care Internet intervention. Internet Interventions. 2014;1(3):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2014.07.003; PMCID: PMC Journal - In Process.

    BACKGROUND
  • Fong AJ, Llanos AAM, Hudson SV, Schmitz K, Lu SE, Phillips SM, Manne SL. Online-delivered resistance exercise intervention among racially diverse breast cancer survivors: Feasibility, acceptability, and exploratory outcomes of B-REP. Support Care Cancer. 2024 Aug 1;32(8):565. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08769-9.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast NeoplasmsMotor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesBehavior

Study Officials

  • Angela Fong, PhD

    Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Administrative

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2020

First Posted

September 24, 2020

Study Start

December 1, 2020

Primary Completion

August 24, 2023

Study Completion

August 24, 2023

Last Updated

October 13, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual data that underlie results will be shared after de-identification for analysis purposes. Data sources include: 1) clinical and physical assessment data collected at the CINJ, 2) patient-reported questionnaire data collected through REDCap in a personal device or study-specific iPad, 3) observational data collected from recording one-on-one exercise sessions, and 4) Interview audio from zoom and transcribed interviews The final dataset will not contain any information that could identify individuals. Data will be shared using secure, Rutgers email between the PI and Co-Is.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
Data will be made available to investigators after one month of data collection and up to 3 years after completion of research activities per Rutgers (ORRA) guidelines.
Access Criteria
Prior approved investigators authorized to review the data will have access to individual participant data.

Locations