NCT04559321

Brief Summary

The desire to reduce complications related to percutaneous access and morbidity related to tract size has led researchers to evaluate PCNL using smaller-caliber instruments. In this context, mini-PCNL has emerged. Its efficacy and safety have been demonstrated at the cost of a lower stone-free rate. The effectiveness of existing Ho: YAG lasers is limited by the need for manual removal of stone fragments and mobilization of them due to the lack of a simultaneous aspiration system. Consequently, this has been associated with long surgical times to achieve stone-free status. This requires multiple insertions and extractions of the nephroscope to facilitate the recovery of all fragments. This repeated step can cause the safety rails to be inadvertently removed or the sheaths to be disinserted. Sometimes compromising surgical results. Faced with this situation, the search for better and more efficient energy sources still continues. With this, modern lithotripters have emerged that combine energy sources and work more efficiently than any of them independently and, consequently, improve stone removal. Cyberwand ™ (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), Swiss Lithoclast® Master / Select (EMS SA, Switzerland / Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) and Shockpulse-SE ™ (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) are some examples; although they have their own set of advantages, none have proven to be superior to any other. As previously discussed, ballistic-ultrasonic lithotripsy combines ultrasonic and ballistic energy together with a suction system with encouraging results in terms of a shorter lithotripsy time and the respective economic impact of fewer surgical events and less operating time required for the stone removal. Therefore, it is convenient to make a comparison between the results of lithotripsy with Ho: YAG laser energy and lithotripsy with LithoClast Trilogy EMS; and thereby determine which is the most effective method in the resolution of kidney stones through a miniaturized percutaneous tract.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
116

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 4, 2020

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 22, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 30, 2020

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 2, 2021

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

September 22, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

September 4, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 18, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Kidney Calculi

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rate of Stone clearance

    defined as the kidney stone surface area in square millimeters measured by pre-operative computed tomography scan divided by the time to remove the targeted stone burden in minutes

    10 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Complications during surgery

    3 months

Study Arms (2)

Holmium laser

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

General anesthesia, Valdivia-Galdakao position, cystoscopy will be performed, ascending pyelography will be performed. A systematic nephroscopy will be performed and once the calculation will proceed to its fragmentation with 100 W Holmium laser.

Procedure: Fragmentation of calculi with 100 W Holmium laser or LithoClast Trilogy EMS and 1.5 mm x 440 mm probe, according to randomization.

Trilogy

EXPERIMENTAL

General anesthesia, Valdivia-Galdakao position, cystoscopy will be performed, ascending pyelography will be performed. A systematic nephroscopy will be performed and once the calculation will proceed to its fragmentation with LithoClast Trilogy EMS and 1.5 mm x 440 mm probe

Procedure: Fragmentation of calculi with 100 W Holmium laser or LithoClast Trilogy EMS and 1.5 mm x 440 mm probe, according to randomization.

Interventions

General anesthesia, Valdivia-Galdakao position, cystoscopy and ascending pyelography will be performed. A systematic nephroscopy will be performed and once the calculation will proceed to its fragmentation with 100 W Holmium laser or LithoClast Trilogy EMS and 1.5 mm x 440 mm probe, according to randomization

Also known as: Trilogy Vs Laser Holmium
Holmium laserTrilogy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female patients older than 18 years
  • Diagnosis of GUY´s kidney stones 1 and 2 who will undergo a percutaneous mini nephrolithotomy
  • Preoperative serum hemoglobin\> 10 g / dl
  • Preoperative serum creatinine \<1.5 mg / dl.
  • Surgical risk I-III according to "American Society of Anesthesiologists".
  • Previous negative urine culture.
  • With postoperative follow-up with computed tomography at three months.
  • Patients who are not participating in another project related to the treatment of lithiasis -Who have signed an informed consent where they agree to be part of the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a history of coagulopathies.
  • Patients with anatomical abnormalities of the urinary tract.
  • Pregnant patients.
  • Patients with kidney stones GUY´s 3 and 4.
  • Patients who do not wish to participate in the clinical trial.
  • Patient who due to their physical and / or mental state are not able to sign the informed consent.
  • Elimination criteria. Patients who have lost follow-up in the first three months after treatment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Regional de Alta Especilidad del bajio

León, Guanajuato, 37660, Mexico

RECRUITING

Related Publications (9)

  • Scotland KB, Kroczak T, Pace KT, Chew BH. Stone technology: intracorporeal lithotripters. World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1347-1351. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2057-x. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

  • Vassar GJ, Chan KF, Teichman JM, Glickman RD, Weintraub ST, Pfefer TJ, Welch AJ. Holmium: YAG lithotripsy: photothermal mechanism. J Endourol. 1999 Apr;13(3):181-90. doi: 10.1089/end.1999.13.181.

  • Okhunov Z, del Junco M, Yoon R, Labadie K, Lusch A, Ordon M. In vitro evaluation of LithAssist: a novel combined holmium laser and suction device. J Endourol. 2014 Aug;28(8):980-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0111. Epub 2014 May 8.

  • Dauw CA, Borofsky MS, York N, Lingeman JE. A Usability Comparison of Laser Suction Handpieces for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1165-1168. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0203.

  • Carlos EC, Wollin DA, Winship BB, Jiang R, Radvak D, Chew BH, Gustafson MR, Simmons WN, Zhong P, Preminger GM, Lipkin ME. In Vitro Comparison of a Novel Single Probe Dual-Energy Lithotripter to Current Devices. J Endourol. 2018 Jun;32(6):534-540. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0143. Epub 2018 May 11.

  • Nottingham CU, Large T, Cobb K, Sur RL, Canvasser NE, Stoughton CL, Krambeck AE. Initial Clinical Experience with Swiss LithoClast Trilogy During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2020 Feb;34(2):151-155. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0561. Epub 2019 Nov 12.

  • Sabnis RB, Balaji SS, Sonawane PL, Sharma R, Vijayakumar M, Singh AG, Ganpule AP, Desai MR. EMS Lithoclast Trilogy: an effective single-probe dual-energy lithotripter for mini and standard PCNL. World J Urol. 2020 Apr;38(4):1043-1050. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02843-2. Epub 2019 Jun 8.

  • Wollin DA, Lipkin ME. Emerging Technologies in Ultrasonic and Pneumatic Lithotripsy. Urol Clin North Am. 2019 May;46(2):207-213. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.12.006.

  • Manzo BO, Lozada Hernandez EE, Casale AR, Jimenez CJ, Gomez YR, Galvan JP, Alarcon P, Flores E, Mendez DM, Sanchez HM. Trilogy vs 100 W Ho: YAG Laser for Lithotripsy in Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Superior Stone-Free Rates in a Randomized Controlled Trial. Urology. 2025 Aug;202:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2025.04.005. Epub 2025 Apr 8.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Kidney CalculiKidney Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

NephrolithiasisUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrolithiasisUrinary CalculiMale Urogenital DiseasesCalculiPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Edgard Efren Dr Lozada Hernandez, Master

    Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Edgard Efren Dr Lozada Hernandez, Master

CONTACT

Braulio Dr Manzo Perez, Dr

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Double-blind. Patient and doctor who performs the statistical analysis will not know which group each patient belongs to.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 116 cases will be subjected to a simple randomization with a table of random numbers, 58 patients will undergo a percutaneous mini nephrolithotomy and lithotripsy with LithoClast Trilogy EMS; and the remaining 58 will undergo 100W Holmium laser lithotripsy.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Master in clinical research

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2020

First Posted

September 22, 2020

Study Start

September 30, 2020

Primary Completion

September 2, 2021

Study Completion

September 1, 2022

Last Updated

September 22, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Via email, any researcher may request the database.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
Time Frame
From the beginning of the study to its end
Access Criteria
Via email, any researcher may request the documents.

Locations