A Study in the United States Using Electronic Medical Records (EMR) to Assess Effectiveness of Afatinib (Gilotrif) Following Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung
Real-World Effectiveness of Afatinib (Gilotrif) Following Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung: A Multi-Site Retrospective Chart Review Study in the U.S.
1 other identifier
observational
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to characterize the profile and outcomes for patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung (SqCC) who progress on 1L pembrolizumab in combination with platinum based chemotherapy and receive afatinib as second line (2L) therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 8, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 18, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 18, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 17, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 8, 2021
CompletedJanuary 11, 2022
December 1, 2021
10 days
September 10, 2020
May 17, 2021
December 22, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Time on Treatment With Afatinib or Chemotherapy During Second Line (2L) Treatment
Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment.
From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated and up to 7.5 months for chemotherapy treated patients
Time on Treatment With Afatinib During Second Line (2L) Treatment Defined by Histology Status
Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment. Patients treated with afatinib were analysed for their histology status and categorized into a squamous cell - or mixed histology treatment group.
From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated patients
Time on Treatment With Afatinib During Second Line (2L) Treatment Defined by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation Status
Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment.
From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated patients
Number of Patients With Severe Immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs) of Specific Interest During Second-line Treatment
Chart abstractors (i.e. the patients treating physician) were asked to abstract information regarding severe (grade 3 or higher) irAEs of specific interest (including pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, interstitial lung disease, higher indeterminate pulmonary events, death, or discontinuation of therapy due to toxicity) during first line (1L) treatment and second line (2L) for both patients treated with afatinib in 2L and those treated with chemotherapy in 2L. Providers/abstractors were asked only if these specific immune related events occurred.
From the start of second-line treatment to the end of follow-up, up to 15 months
Study Arms (2)
Second line (2L) afatinib
Second line (2L) afatinib treated following discontinuation of pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (first line (1L))
Second line (2L) chemotherapy
Second line (2L) chemotherapy treated following discontinuation of pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (first line (1L))
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with metastatic Squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) of the lung treated with pembrolizumab in combination with platinum doublet chemotherapy as first line (1L) treatment followed by either afatinib as second line (2L) treatment or chemotherapy as 2L treatment.
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of squamous or mixed histology non-small cell lung cancer
- Treated with pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy as initial therapy for advanced or metastatic disease (stage IIIB or IV)
- First cycle of pembrolizumab received after 06/01/2018
- Permanently discontinued 1L pembrolizumab treatment
- Initiated second-line treatment at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection, with either :
- Afatinib
- Any chemotherapy
- Age ≥ 18 years
You may not qualify if:
- Received pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy as part of an interventional clinical trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions
Dublin, Ohio, 43017, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Boehringer Ingelheim, Call Centre
- Organization
- Boehringer Ingelheim
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 10, 2020
First Posted
September 17, 2020
Study Start
May 8, 2020
Primary Completion
May 18, 2020
Study Completion
May 18, 2020
Last Updated
January 11, 2022
Results First Posted
July 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Clinical studies sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim, phases I to IV, interventional and non-interventional, are in scope for sharing of the raw clinical study data and clinical study documents. Exceptions might apply, e.g. studies in products where Boehringer Ingelheim is not the license holder; studies regarding pharmaceutical formulations and associated analytical methods, and studies pertinent to pharmacokinetics using human biomaterials; studies conducted in a single center or targeting rare diseases (in case of low number of patients and therefore limitations with anonymization). For more details refer to: https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datatransparency