NCT04546854

Brief Summary

As part of the fight against COVID-19, the UK government has announced its most comprehensive flu campaign to date (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/most-comprehensive-flu-programme-in-uk-history-will-be-rolled-out-this-winter). This should not be surpising: every year NHS hospitals experience an overwhelming number of influenza cases, and COVID-19 increases this concern. As in previous years, the flu vaccine is free at the point of care for people 65 and over. New this year is that later in the season the vaccine will be made available free at the point of care for people 50 and over. However, if people refuse to take the vaccine this comprehensive program cannot benefit public health. The degree to which vaccine hesitancy is expressed varies across characteristics of the vaccine considered and the time and place it is offered, and across characteristics of the person's perceptions of complacency, convenience, confidence, calculations, and communal responsibility, i.e. the "5Cs". Information campaigns can be used to influence all 5Cs, and public facing information is often a necessary component of public health campaigns that may also include structural components. Largely, information campaigns can be viewed as a type of educational intervention. Educational interventions may fall short of what is needed to alter people's intentions to vaccinate where they focus on system 1 rational thinking processes and neglect system 2 automatic thinking processes. To be more effective, public health messages must be tailored to align with the "beliefs, attitudes, and motivations" of the very people they intend to influence. Fact-led educational interventions to increase parents' intentions to vaccinate their children are particularly ineffective where more subtle content opposes the recipient's deep-seated values. In a different context, recycling behaviour, previous research demonstrated that messages aligned with people's deep-seated values (i.e. the moral foundations that underlie political ideologies) are more likely to promote desired behavioural intentions than unaligned messages. The present research expands the scope of previous research in two ways. First, rather than investigating parental attitudes towards vaccination, the investigators will look at people's intentions to self-vaccinate. Second, the investigators will explore the effectiveness of messages aligned with the moral foundations that underlie individual's political ideologies on their intentions to be vaccinated.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 5, 2020

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 14, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 21, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 21, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 21, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 25, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

September 5, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 23, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Intentions to take up the seasonal influenza vaccination

    Participants rate their intentions to take up the seasonal influenza vaccination on a 7-point likert scale, from strongly disagree (=1) to strongly agree (=7).

    1 day

Study Arms (2)

Conservative - Binding Appeal

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Appeals

Liberal - Individulizing Appeal

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Appeals

Interventions

AppealsBEHAVIORAL

Written text motivating participants to take up the seasonal influenza vaccination

Conservative - Binding AppealLiberal - Individulizing Appeal

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Resident in England
  • Age 50+ years old, inclusive
  • The age criteria is set at 50+ years old, because this is the age group currently being advised by Public Health England to seek the flu jab as soon as possible this season. (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/most-comprehensive-flu-programme-in-uk-history-will-be-rolled-out-this-winter).

You may not qualify if:

  • Not a resident in England
  • Age less than 50 years old

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Warwick

Coventry, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Influenza, Human

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract InfectionsInfectionsOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsRNA Virus InfectionsVirus DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2020

First Posted

September 14, 2020

Study Start

September 21, 2020

Primary Completion

September 21, 2020

Study Completion

September 21, 2020

Last Updated

September 25, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09

Locations