Erector Spinae Plane Block in Post-herpetic Neuralgia
The Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block on the Relief of Pain of Post-herpetic Neuralgia: Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized clinical study will be carried out on 72 patients admitted to the pain clinic in Tanta University Hospitals with post-herpetic neuralgia. Cases presenting to the Pain Clinic with acute pain due to postherpetic neuralgia in thoracic and/or lumbar dermatomes with numerical rating scale (NRS) of 6 or more and they will be randomly divided, using the closed envelop method, into three equal groups. Group A (24 patients): Patients will be subjected to the routine medical treatment of post herpetic neuralgia as controls (Pregabalin, acyclovir, and paracetamol) and sham erector spinae plane block Group B (24 patients): Patients will be subjected to erector spinae block by bupivacaine (2 - 2.5 mg/kg, with a maximum of 175 mg/dose) together with medical treatment. Group C (24 patients): Patients that will subjected to erector spinae block by bupivacaine (2 - 2.5 mg/kg, with a maximum of 175 mg/dose with the addition of MgSO4 (equivalent to 100 mg)) together with medical treatment. Primary outcome will be the efficacy of pain relief Secondary outcome will be the frequency of pain and the consumption of analgesics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 9, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 14, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 26, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 19, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 19, 2021
CompletedAugust 3, 2021
July 1, 2021
9 months
September 9, 2020
July 31, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The efficacy of pain relief
Numerical rating score NRS (0- 10 metric score to assess the severity of pain where 0= no pain and 10 = severe pain)
within 3 months of theinjection
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The frequency of pain
within 3 months of theinjection
Study Arms (3)
Group A
EXPERIMENTALPatients will be subjected to the routine medical treatment of post herpetic neuralgia as controls (Pregabalin, acyclovir, and paracetamol) and sham erector spinae plane block
Group B
EXPERIMENTALPatients will be subjected to erector spinae block by bupivacaine (2 - 2.5 mg/kg, with a maximum of 175 mg/dose) together with medical treatment.
Group C
EXPERIMENTALPatients that will be subjected to erector spinae block by bupivacaine (2 - 2.5 mg/kg, with a maximum of 175 mg/dose with the addition of MgSO4 (equivalent to 100 mg)) together with medical treatment.
Interventions
routine medical treatment of post herpetic neuralgia as controls (Pregabalin, acyclovir, and paracetamol)
Ultrasound guided Erector spinae plane block with injection of local anesthetic bupivacaine (2 - 2.5 mg/kg, with a maximum of 175 mg/dose)
Ultrasound guided Erector spinae plane block with injection of local anesthetic bupivacaine (2 - 2.5 mg/kg, with a maximum of 175 mg/dose with the addition of MgSO4 (equivalent to 100 mg))
Ultrasound guided Erector spinae plane block with injection ofnormal saline
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Cases presenting to the Pain Clinic with acute pain due to postherpetic neuralgia in thoracic and/or lumbar dermatomes with a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 6 or more.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients commenced on opioids for any other reason rather than postherpetic neuralgia
- Secondary bacterial infection at the site of injection
- Uncontrolled psychiatric illness
- Uncooperative patients
- Refusal to participate in the study
- Diagnosed or suspected coagulopathy
- Morbid Obese patients with BMI \>50 kg/m2
- Known history of allergy to local anesthetics
- Platelet count less than 75,000/ cc
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tanta Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Tanta University hospitals
Tanta, 31511, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sameh Abdelkhalik, M.D
Tanta University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- * The patients will be blinded to their groups and a sham block will be performed. * An anesthesia resident who will not participate in the study and have no subsequent rule in it will help in the preparation of local anesthetic mixtures under strict aseptic precautions. * An assistant nurse who will be blinded to the study groups and will have no subsequent rule in it will help in collection of the data of measurements.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 9, 2020
First Posted
September 14, 2020
Study Start
September 26, 2020
Primary Completion
June 19, 2021
Study Completion
June 19, 2021
Last Updated
August 3, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- 6 months after approval of the publication of the trial.
- Access Criteria
- Contact the principal investigator
The data of primary outcome will be available with the corresponding author till 6 months after approval of the publication of the trial.