A Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Cosmetic Product in the Treatment of Facial Lines
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of an Anti-Aging Serum in the Treatment of Facial Lines
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of an anti-aging serum to improve the appearance of expression lines as well as overall skin health of aging skin after 12 weeks of twice-daily use in female subjects, aged 35-60, compared to placebo. A total of 55 subjects completed study participation which included 33 subjects in the active group and 22 subjects in the placebo group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 23, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 11, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 6, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 4, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 11, 2020
CompletedSeptember 16, 2020
September 1, 2020
3 months
September 4, 2020
September 14, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Clinical Efficacy Graded by Griffiths' Scale
The primary efficacy endpoint will be the Investigator Clinical Grading using Modified Griffith's 10-point Scale. A decrease in scores at Day 28, Day 56 and Day 84 in comparison to baseline indicates an improvement for the indicated parameter.The efficacy parameters will be assessed globally on each subject's face using a modified Griffiths' 10-point scale according to the following numerical definitions (half-point scores may be used as necessary to more accurately describe the skin condition): 0 = none (best possible condition); 1 to 3 = mild; 4 to 6 = moderate;7 to 9 = severe (worst possible condition). The lower the score equates to the best possible outcome.
12 weeks
Objective Tolerability: scores
The primary tolerability endpoint will be the Investigator Tolerability Assessment of Erythema, Edema and Dryness. A decrease in scores or lack of significant increase at Day 28, Day 56 and Day 84 in comparison to Baseline indicates tolerability/safety of the test material. Four point scale with a lower score indicating a better outcome. Example for Erythema:Erythema 0 = None No erythema of the treatment area 1. = Mild Slight, but definite redness of the treatment area 2. = Moderate Definite redness of the treatment area 3. = Severe Marked redness of the treatment area
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Subjective Tolerability: scores
12 weeks
Self Assessment Questions
12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Anti-aging Serum
ACTIVE COMPARATORDosage form: Serum composed of water, thickener, and bioactive ingredients including antioxidants and peptides. Frequency of Dosage: Two times daily. Subjects are asked to pump 2x and apply on global face morning and evening. Study Duration: 12 weeks.
Placebo Serum
PLACEBO COMPARATORDosage form: Serum composed of water and thickener. Frequency of Dosage: Two times daily. Subjects are asked to pump 2x and apply on global face morning and evening. Study Duration: 12 weeks.
Interventions
Facial cleanser to be used by study participants
Bland moisturizer to be used by study participants after serum in the evening.
Sunscreen to be applied after application of serum in the morning.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women between the ages of 35 and 60 years were scheduled for eligibility screening at the study site.
- Women with Fitzpatrick Skin Type I-VI
- Subjects must have mild to moderate global face wrinkles and fine lines
- Subjects may have mild to moderate photo-aging secondary to physiologic aging
- Subjects must have no known medical conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with study participation.
- Subjects must be willing to provide verbal understanding and written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Female subjects who are pregnant, breast feeding, or planning a pregnancy.
- Subjects with severe overall photo damage as determined by the Investigator.
- Subjects who have any dermatological disorder, which in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with the accurate evaluation of the subject's skin, including rosacea, acne, and excessively oily or dry skin.
- Subjects who have demonstrated a previous hypersensitivity reaction to any of the ingredients of the study products.
- Subjects use of any medications that are known to potentially cause changes in the facial skin as determined by the Investigator.
- Subjects who spend excessive time out in the sun.
- Subjects who are unwilling or unable to comply with the requirements of the protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Revision Skincarelead
- Ablon Skin Institute Research Centercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Ablon Skin Institute Research Center
Manhattan Beach, California, 90266, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Glynis Ablon, MD, FAAD
Ablon Skin Institute Research Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Randomization will occur by assignment to either the active group or placebo group using a randomization table prepared prior to the start of the study by a non-participating staff member at the office of the investigator. Subjects will be assigned a number in numerical order as enrolled. The unblinded staff member will take a set of products from one of two groups of labeled active product vs. placebo and fill in the patient number and distribution date on the bottles to be dispensed to the subject.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 4, 2020
First Posted
September 11, 2020
Study Start
December 23, 2019
Primary Completion
March 11, 2020
Study Completion
July 6, 2020
Last Updated
September 16, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09