NCT04543474

Brief Summary

A low FODMAP diet (LFD) has become a standard treatment in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients. Compliant adherence to a LFD is challenging. The investigator looked at the effect of a LFD compared to a less restrictive low lactose diet (LLD) in a randomized cross-over trial with IBS patients.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2015

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 11, 2015

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 19, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 19, 2017

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 15, 2020

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 10, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 10, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

August 15, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 2, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from gastrointestinal symptoms in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS symptom severity score) from Baseline to "post intervention diet".

    The symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) is a validated score to evaluate the severity of an IBS. The five subscores for abdominal pain (severity and frequency), abdominal distension, satisfaction with stool habits and interference of IBS with daily life were each rated on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale and added up to a maximal sum of 500. A total score of 75 - 175 was regarded as mild, 175 - 300 as moderate and \> 300 as severe IBS.

    The IBS SSS was assessed at the end of the run in period and at the end of the intervention diets (low lactose and low FODMAP diet) at day 14, 35 and 77.

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • IBS symptom severity subscore "abdominal pain severity"

    IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.

  • IBS- symptom severity subscore "abdominal pain frequency"

    IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.

  • IBS- symptom severity subscore "abdominal distension"

    IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.

  • IBS symptom severity subscore "satisfaction with stool habits"

    IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.

  • IBS symptom severity subscore "interference of IBS with daily life"

    IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Group 1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients starting with a low lactose diet for 3 weeks, followed by a wash out phase of 3 week, before crossing over to the low FODMAP diet for 3 weeks

Other: Low Lactose DietOther: Low FODMAP Diet

Group 2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients starting with a low FODMAP diet for 3 weeks, followed by a wash out phase of 3 week, before crossing over to the low lactose diet for 3 weeks.

Other: Low Lactose DietOther: Low FODMAP Diet

Interventions

First, there was a run-in period (day 1-14), during which patients were randomly assigned by computer-generated bloc randomization to either the LLD or the LFD for 21 days (day 15-35). A dietician educated the participants on the first interventional diet. This phase was followed by a wash-out period of 21 days (day 36-56) with resumption of a normal balanced daily-life diet before crossing over to the alternate interventional diet (day 57-77). There were visits at the end of the washout phase with an instruction on the second interventional diet and at the end of the study.

Group 1Group 2

First, there was a run-in period (day 1-14), during which patients were randomly assigned by computer-generated bloc randomization to either the LLD or the LFD for 21 days (day 15-35). A dietician educated the participants on the first interventional diet. This phase was followed by a wash-out period of 21 days (day 36-56) with resumption of a normal balanced daily-life diet before crossing over to the alternate interventional diet (day 57-77). There were visits at the end of the washout phase with an instruction on the second interventional diet and at the end of the study.

Group 1Group 2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • functional bowel symptoms as defined by the Rome IV criteria
  • subjective lactose intolerance

You may not qualify if:

  • pharmacologic agents to alter symptoms (laxatives, antidiarrheal agents)
  • smoking
  • antibiotic therapy within the last 4 weeks
  • gastrointestinal diseases (Celiac disease was excluded by negative serologic testing while on a gluten containing diet
  • any type of food allergy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Interventions

FODMAP Diet

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Colonic Diseases, FunctionalColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Elimination DietsDietNutritional Physiological PhenomenaDiet, Food, and NutritionPhysiological Phenomena

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2020

First Posted

September 10, 2020

Study Start

March 11, 2015

Primary Completion

September 19, 2017

Study Completion

December 19, 2017

Last Updated

September 10, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share