Treatment Efficacy of Low FODMAP Versus Low Lactose Diet in IBS Patients
Treatment Efficacy of a Low FODMAP Diet Compared to a Low Lactose Diet in IBS Patients: a Randomized, Cross-over Designed Study
1 other identifier
interventional
30
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
A low FODMAP diet (LFD) has become a standard treatment in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients. Compliant adherence to a LFD is challenging. The investigator looked at the effect of a LFD compared to a less restrictive low lactose diet (LLD) in a randomized cross-over trial with IBS patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 11, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 19, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 19, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 10, 2020
CompletedSeptember 10, 2020
September 1, 2020
2.5 years
August 15, 2020
September 2, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from gastrointestinal symptoms in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS symptom severity score) from Baseline to "post intervention diet".
The symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) is a validated score to evaluate the severity of an IBS. The five subscores for abdominal pain (severity and frequency), abdominal distension, satisfaction with stool habits and interference of IBS with daily life were each rated on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale and added up to a maximal sum of 500. A total score of 75 - 175 was regarded as mild, 175 - 300 as moderate and \> 300 as severe IBS.
The IBS SSS was assessed at the end of the run in period and at the end of the intervention diets (low lactose and low FODMAP diet) at day 14, 35 and 77.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
IBS symptom severity subscore "abdominal pain severity"
IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.
IBS- symptom severity subscore "abdominal pain frequency"
IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.
IBS- symptom severity subscore "abdominal distension"
IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.
IBS symptom severity subscore "satisfaction with stool habits"
IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.
IBS symptom severity subscore "interference of IBS with daily life"
IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients starting with a low lactose diet for 3 weeks, followed by a wash out phase of 3 week, before crossing over to the low FODMAP diet for 3 weeks
Group 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients starting with a low FODMAP diet for 3 weeks, followed by a wash out phase of 3 week, before crossing over to the low lactose diet for 3 weeks.
Interventions
First, there was a run-in period (day 1-14), during which patients were randomly assigned by computer-generated bloc randomization to either the LLD or the LFD for 21 days (day 15-35). A dietician educated the participants on the first interventional diet. This phase was followed by a wash-out period of 21 days (day 36-56) with resumption of a normal balanced daily-life diet before crossing over to the alternate interventional diet (day 57-77). There were visits at the end of the washout phase with an instruction on the second interventional diet and at the end of the study.
First, there was a run-in period (day 1-14), during which patients were randomly assigned by computer-generated bloc randomization to either the LLD or the LFD for 21 days (day 15-35). A dietician educated the participants on the first interventional diet. This phase was followed by a wash-out period of 21 days (day 36-56) with resumption of a normal balanced daily-life diet before crossing over to the alternate interventional diet (day 57-77). There were visits at the end of the washout phase with an instruction on the second interventional diet and at the end of the study.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- functional bowel symptoms as defined by the Rome IV criteria
- subjective lactose intolerance
You may not qualify if:
- pharmacologic agents to alter symptoms (laxatives, antidiarrheal agents)
- smoking
- antibiotic therapy within the last 4 weeks
- gastrointestinal diseases (Celiac disease was excluded by negative serologic testing while on a gluten containing diet
- any type of food allergy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2020
First Posted
September 10, 2020
Study Start
March 11, 2015
Primary Completion
September 19, 2017
Study Completion
December 19, 2017
Last Updated
September 10, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share