Moral Judgements and Choices of Caregivers in the Time of COVID-19 Pandemic
XPHI-COVID19
1 other identifier
interventional
500
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The XPHI-COVID19 randomized study aims to investigate the mechanisms of moral judgements in a population of caregivers, using a survey, with the results to the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale as primary outcome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 3, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 2, 2021
CompletedSeptember 9, 2020
July 1, 2020
8 months
August 31, 2020
September 8, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oxford Utilitarianism Scale
Two-Dimensional Model of Utilitarian Psychology
Up to one year
Study Arms (2)
Choices then judgements
NO INTERVENTIONJudgements then choices
ACTIVE COMPARATORSwitch in the order of clinical cases in the survey
Interventions
In the intervention arm, the participant is asked to answer clinical cases in a reverse order from the control group (control has to make moral choices then judge somebody else's choices ; intervention has to judge moral choices first, then make his own)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All caregivers from french public healthcare center with Intensive Care Unit
- Agreement
You may not qualify if:
- Refuse to participate or withdraw agreement
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital, Caenlead
- University of Geneva, Switzerlandcollaborator
Related Publications (8)
Kahane G, Everett JAC, Earp BD, Caviola L, Faber NS, Crockett MJ, Savulescu J. Beyond sacrificial harm: A two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology. Psychol Rev. 2018 Mar;125(2):131-164. doi: 10.1037/rev0000093. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
PMID: 29265854BACKGROUNDGarbutt G, Davies P. Should the practice of medicine be a deontological or utilitarian enterprise? J Med Ethics. 2011 May;37(5):267-70. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.036111. Epub 2011 Jan 29.
PMID: 21278402BACKGROUNDConway P, Goldstein-Greenwood J, Polacek D, Greene JD. Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers. Cognition. 2018 Oct;179:241-265. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
PMID: 30064654BACKGROUNDEinav S, Benoit DD. Focus on ethics of admission and discharge policies and conflicts of interest. Intensive Care Med. 2019 Aug;45(8):1130-1132. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05673-3. Epub 2019 Jul 2. No abstract available.
PMID: 31267194BACKGROUNDEmanuel EJ, Persad G, Upshur R, Thome B, Parker M, Glickman A, Zhang C, Boyle C, Smith M, Phillips JP. Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2049-2055. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2005114. Epub 2020 Mar 23. No abstract available.
PMID: 32202722BACKGROUNDTruog RD, Mitchell C, Daley GQ. The Toughest Triage - Allocating Ventilators in a Pandemic. N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):1973-1975. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2005689. Epub 2020 Mar 23. No abstract available.
PMID: 32202721BACKGROUNDLeclerc T, Donat N, Donat A, Pasquier P, Libert N, Schaeffer E, D'Aranda E, Cotte J, Fontaine B, Perrigault PF, Michel F, Muller L, Meaudre E, Veber B. Prioritisation of ICU treatments for critically ill patients in a COVID-19 pandemic with scarce resources. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2020 Jun;39(3):333-339. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 May 17.
PMID: 32426441BACKGROUNDRosenbaum L. Facing Covid-19 in Italy - Ethics, Logistics, and Therapeutics on the Epidemic's Front Line. N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382(20):1873-1875. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2005492. Epub 2020 Mar 18. No abstract available.
PMID: 32187459BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Clement GAKUBA, MD PhD
University Hospital, Caen
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2020
First Posted
September 9, 2020
Study Start
September 3, 2020
Primary Completion
April 30, 2021
Study Completion
August 2, 2021
Last Updated
September 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share