NCT04541667

Brief Summary

During the course of an endoscopic procedure, air has historically been used to inflate the lumen to provide adequate visualization and allow for the endoscope to advance as necessary. In many adult centers, carbon dioxide is used for insufflation for all procedures. Many pediatric centers have started using carbon dioxide for insufflation during endoscopy based on the adult studies. Few pediatric studies have been done. This study is designed to test whether carbon dioxide is associated with any negative, post-procedural, outcomes in pediatric patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 18, 2019

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 1, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 9, 2020

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2021

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 31, 2022

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 15, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

October 10, 2023

Status Verified

September 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

September 1, 2020

Results QC Date

July 27, 2022

Last Update Submit

September 26, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

upper endoscopyendoscopeabdominal discomfortinsufflationcarbon dioxide

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Procedures With Elevated End-tidal CO2 Levels

    Compare the peak end-tidal CO2 levels (\>/= 60 mmHg) observed during endoscopy in children managed with endotracheal intubation or laryngeal mask airway using CO2 versus air

    Measured from time of procedure start to time of procedure conclusion this lasts usually from 1-2.5 hours.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants Reporting Abdominal Pain

    This will be assessed before and after the procedure

Study Arms (2)

Air for luminal inflation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients randomized into this arm will have luminal inflation using air.

Other: Air

Carbon Dioxide for luminal inflation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients randomized into this arm will have luminal inflation using carbon dioxide.

Other: Carbon Dioxide

Interventions

AirOTHER

Air will be used for luminal inflation.

Also known as: Gas
Air for luminal inflation

Carbon dioxide will be used for luminal inflation.

Also known as: Gas
Carbon Dioxide for luminal inflation

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Months - 19 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Children 6 months to 19 years old and
  • Undergoing upper endoscopy at Children's Hospital \& Medical Center in Omaha, NE and
  • Parents or legal guardians consent to the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients and legal guardians who decline participation in the study
  • Patients with chronic respiratory disease (defined as severe asthma, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and cystic fibrosis-related pulmonary disease)
  • Patients with cyanotic heart disease
  • Patients with an ASA status of ≥ 3.
  • Patients who are wards of the state or in foster care
  • Prisoners
  • Patients undergoing colonoscopy only procedures or procedures not related to upper endoscopy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Children's Hospital & Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, 68114, United States

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • Steppan J, Hogue CW Jr. Cerebral and tissue oximetry. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Dec;28(4):429-39. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 28.

    PMID: 25480772BACKGROUND
  • ASGE Technology Committee; Lo SK, Fujii-Lau LL, Enestvedt BK, Hwang JH, Konda V, Manfredi MA, Maple JT, Murad FM, Pannala R, Woods KL, Banerjee S. The use of carbon dioxide in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May;83(5):857-65. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.046. Epub 2016 Mar 3. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26946413BACKGROUND
  • Chen SW, Hui CK, Chang JJ, Lee TS, Chan SC, Chien CH, Hu CC, Lin CL, Chen LW, Liu CJ, Yen CL, Hsieh PJ, Liu CK, Su CS, Yu CY, Chien RN. Carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy can significantly decrease post-interventional abdominal discomfort in deeply sedated patients: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;31(4):808-13. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13181.

    PMID: 26421801BACKGROUND
  • Liu X, Liu D, Li J, Ou D, Zhou Z. [Safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2009 Aug;34(8):825-9. Chinese.

    PMID: 19734597BACKGROUND
  • Lynch I, Hayes A, Buffum MD, Conners EE. Insufflation using carbon dioxide versus room air during colonoscopy: comparison of patient comfort, recovery time, and nursing resources. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2015 May-Jun;38(3):211-7. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000109.

    PMID: 25946475BACKGROUND
  • Memon MA, Memon B, Yunus RM, Khan S. Carbon Dioxide Versus Air Insufflation for Elective Colonoscopy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Apr;26(2):102-16. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000243.

    PMID: 26841319BACKGROUND
  • Riss S, Akan B, Mikola B, Rieder E, Karner-Hanusch J, Dirlea D, Mittlbock M, Weiser FA. CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy decreases post-interventional pain in deeply sedated patients: a randomized controlled trial. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2009;121(13-14):464-8. doi: 10.1007/s00508-009-1202-y.

    PMID: 19657610BACKGROUND
  • Sajid MS, Caswell J, Bhatti MI, Sains P, Baig MK, Miles WF. Carbon dioxide insufflation vs conventional air insufflation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis. 2015 Feb;17(2):111-23. doi: 10.1111/codi.12837.

    PMID: 25393051BACKGROUND
  • Singh R, Neo EN, Nordeen N, Shanmuganathan G, Ashby A, Drummond S, Nind G, Murphy E, Luck A, Tucker G, Tam W. Carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy in deeply sedated patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul 7;18(25):3250-3. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i25.3250.

    PMID: 22783048BACKGROUND
  • Homan M, Mahkovic D, Orel R, Mamula P. Randomized, double-blind trial of CO2 versus air insufflation in children undergoing colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May;83(5):993-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.073. Epub 2015 Sep 10.

    PMID: 26363332BACKGROUND
  • Kresz A, Mayer B, Zernickel M, Posovszky C. Carbon dioxide versus room air for colonoscopy in deeply sedated pediatric patients: a randomized controlled trial. Endosc Int Open. 2019 Feb;7(2):E290-E297. doi: 10.1055/a-0806-7060. Epub 2019 Jan 30.

    PMID: 30705964BACKGROUND
  • Thornhill C, Navarro F, Alabd Alrazzak B, Hashmi SS, DebRoy AN, Rhoads JM, Imseis E. Insufflation With Carbon Dioxide During Pediatric Colonoscopy for Control of Postprocedure Pain. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Sep;52(8):715-720. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000910.

    PMID: 29210902BACKGROUND
  • Eastwood GM, Tanaka A, Bellomo R. Cerebral oxygenation in mechanically ventilated early cardiac arrest survivors: The impact of hypercapnia. Resuscitation. 2016 May;102:11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Feb 21.

    PMID: 26903288BACKGROUND
  • Erdogan S, Oto A, Bosnak M. Reliability of cerebral oximeter in non-invasive diagnosis and follow-up of hypercapnia. Turk J Pediatr. 2016;58(4):389-394. doi: 10.24953/turkjped.2016.04.007.

    PMID: 28276211BACKGROUND
  • Dike CR, Huang Pacheco A, Lyden E, Freestone D, Choudhry O, Bishop WP, Shukry M. Elevations in End-Tidal CO 2 With CO 2 Use During Pediatric Endoscopy With Airway Protection: Is This Physiologically Significant? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2023 May 1;76(5):660-666. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003748. Epub 2023 Feb 22.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

AirGasesCarbon Dioxide

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AtmosphereEnvironmentEcological and Environmental PhenomenaBiological PhenomenaMeteorological ConceptsEnvironment and Public HealthInorganic ChemicalsCarbon Compounds, InorganicOxidesOxygen Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Chinenye Dike
Organization
University of Nebraska Medical Center

Study Officials

  • Chinenye R Dike, MD

    Children's Hospital & Medical Center / University of Nebraska Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
This is a double-blinded, prospective, randomized study
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Eligible study participants will be randomized 1:1 into two study arms; one receiving air and the other receiving carbon dioxide for luminal inflation.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2020

First Posted

September 9, 2020

Study Start

November 18, 2019

Primary Completion

July 31, 2021

Study Completion

May 31, 2022

Last Updated

October 10, 2023

Results First Posted

February 15, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations