Is End Tidal CO2 Level Elevation During Upper Endoscopy With CO2 Gas Insufflation Physiologically Significant
ETCO2
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
During the course of an endoscopic procedure, air has historically been used to inflate the lumen to provide adequate visualization and allow for the endoscope to advance as necessary. In many adult centers, carbon dioxide is used for insufflation for all procedures. Many pediatric centers have started using carbon dioxide for insufflation during endoscopy based on the adult studies. Few pediatric studies have been done. This study is designed to test whether carbon dioxide is associated with any negative, post-procedural, outcomes in pediatric patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 18, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 15, 2023
CompletedOctober 10, 2023
September 1, 2023
1.7 years
September 1, 2020
July 27, 2022
September 26, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Procedures With Elevated End-tidal CO2 Levels
Compare the peak end-tidal CO2 levels (\>/= 60 mmHg) observed during endoscopy in children managed with endotracheal intubation or laryngeal mask airway using CO2 versus air
Measured from time of procedure start to time of procedure conclusion this lasts usually from 1-2.5 hours.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants Reporting Abdominal Pain
This will be assessed before and after the procedure
Study Arms (2)
Air for luminal inflation
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomized into this arm will have luminal inflation using air.
Carbon Dioxide for luminal inflation
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomized into this arm will have luminal inflation using carbon dioxide.
Interventions
Carbon dioxide will be used for luminal inflation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children 6 months to 19 years old and
- Undergoing upper endoscopy at Children's Hospital \& Medical Center in Omaha, NE and
- Parents or legal guardians consent to the study
You may not qualify if:
- Patients and legal guardians who decline participation in the study
- Patients with chronic respiratory disease (defined as severe asthma, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and cystic fibrosis-related pulmonary disease)
- Patients with cyanotic heart disease
- Patients with an ASA status of ≥ 3.
- Patients who are wards of the state or in foster care
- Prisoners
- Patients undergoing colonoscopy only procedures or procedures not related to upper endoscopy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Children's Hospital & Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114, United States
Related Publications (15)
Steppan J, Hogue CW Jr. Cerebral and tissue oximetry. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Dec;28(4):429-39. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
PMID: 25480772BACKGROUNDASGE Technology Committee; Lo SK, Fujii-Lau LL, Enestvedt BK, Hwang JH, Konda V, Manfredi MA, Maple JT, Murad FM, Pannala R, Woods KL, Banerjee S. The use of carbon dioxide in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May;83(5):857-65. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.046. Epub 2016 Mar 3. No abstract available.
PMID: 26946413BACKGROUNDChen SW, Hui CK, Chang JJ, Lee TS, Chan SC, Chien CH, Hu CC, Lin CL, Chen LW, Liu CJ, Yen CL, Hsieh PJ, Liu CK, Su CS, Yu CY, Chien RN. Carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy can significantly decrease post-interventional abdominal discomfort in deeply sedated patients: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;31(4):808-13. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13181.
PMID: 26421801BACKGROUNDLiu X, Liu D, Li J, Ou D, Zhou Z. [Safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2009 Aug;34(8):825-9. Chinese.
PMID: 19734597BACKGROUNDLynch I, Hayes A, Buffum MD, Conners EE. Insufflation using carbon dioxide versus room air during colonoscopy: comparison of patient comfort, recovery time, and nursing resources. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2015 May-Jun;38(3):211-7. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000109.
PMID: 25946475BACKGROUNDMemon MA, Memon B, Yunus RM, Khan S. Carbon Dioxide Versus Air Insufflation for Elective Colonoscopy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Apr;26(2):102-16. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000243.
PMID: 26841319BACKGROUNDRiss S, Akan B, Mikola B, Rieder E, Karner-Hanusch J, Dirlea D, Mittlbock M, Weiser FA. CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy decreases post-interventional pain in deeply sedated patients: a randomized controlled trial. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2009;121(13-14):464-8. doi: 10.1007/s00508-009-1202-y.
PMID: 19657610BACKGROUNDSajid MS, Caswell J, Bhatti MI, Sains P, Baig MK, Miles WF. Carbon dioxide insufflation vs conventional air insufflation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis. 2015 Feb;17(2):111-23. doi: 10.1111/codi.12837.
PMID: 25393051BACKGROUNDSingh R, Neo EN, Nordeen N, Shanmuganathan G, Ashby A, Drummond S, Nind G, Murphy E, Luck A, Tucker G, Tam W. Carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy in deeply sedated patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul 7;18(25):3250-3. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i25.3250.
PMID: 22783048BACKGROUNDHoman M, Mahkovic D, Orel R, Mamula P. Randomized, double-blind trial of CO2 versus air insufflation in children undergoing colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May;83(5):993-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.073. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
PMID: 26363332BACKGROUNDKresz A, Mayer B, Zernickel M, Posovszky C. Carbon dioxide versus room air for colonoscopy in deeply sedated pediatric patients: a randomized controlled trial. Endosc Int Open. 2019 Feb;7(2):E290-E297. doi: 10.1055/a-0806-7060. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
PMID: 30705964BACKGROUNDThornhill C, Navarro F, Alabd Alrazzak B, Hashmi SS, DebRoy AN, Rhoads JM, Imseis E. Insufflation With Carbon Dioxide During Pediatric Colonoscopy for Control of Postprocedure Pain. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Sep;52(8):715-720. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000910.
PMID: 29210902BACKGROUNDEastwood GM, Tanaka A, Bellomo R. Cerebral oxygenation in mechanically ventilated early cardiac arrest survivors: The impact of hypercapnia. Resuscitation. 2016 May;102:11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Feb 21.
PMID: 26903288BACKGROUNDErdogan S, Oto A, Bosnak M. Reliability of cerebral oximeter in non-invasive diagnosis and follow-up of hypercapnia. Turk J Pediatr. 2016;58(4):389-394. doi: 10.24953/turkjped.2016.04.007.
PMID: 28276211BACKGROUNDDike CR, Huang Pacheco A, Lyden E, Freestone D, Choudhry O, Bishop WP, Shukry M. Elevations in End-Tidal CO 2 With CO 2 Use During Pediatric Endoscopy With Airway Protection: Is This Physiologically Significant? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2023 May 1;76(5):660-666. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003748. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
PMID: 36821847DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Chinenye Dike
- Organization
- University of Nebraska Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chinenye R Dike, MD
Children's Hospital & Medical Center / University of Nebraska Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- This is a double-blinded, prospective, randomized study
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 1, 2020
First Posted
September 9, 2020
Study Start
November 18, 2019
Primary Completion
July 31, 2021
Study Completion
May 31, 2022
Last Updated
October 10, 2023
Results First Posted
February 15, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share