Video Consultation During Follow up Surgical Care
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to compare the willingness to use and attitude towards VC amongst both patients with colorectal cancer and healthcare providers during follow up care. Second, to determine the satisfaction with the quality of the healthcare provider and the usability of the used VC technology. 50 patients will be asked to choose between video consultation or face-to-face contact at the outpatient surgical clinic.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jun 2017
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 23, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 23, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 4, 2020
CompletedSeptember 4, 2020
August 1, 2020
3 months
August 31, 2020
September 3, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Attitude and satisfaction with video consultation
PAT-VC questionnaire
Immediately after the consult
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Usability of the video consultation technology
Immediately after the test consult
Quality of provided care by surgeon: MSF questionnaire
Immediately after the consult
Satisfaction of surgeons: Questionnaire
Immediately after the consult
Study Arms (2)
F2F-Group
Patients who preferred a traditional F2F-appointment were seen at the outpatient clinic.
VC-group
Patients who preferred a video consult were seen over a video connection.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with colorectal cancer scheduled for appointment at the surgical oncology outpatient a tertiary referral center.
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older
- Fluent in speaking and writing in Dutch
- Follow up appointments in which overall progress, new complaints, results with good news and treatment was discussed were considered feasible.
You may not qualify if:
- Introductory appointments
- Bad news consultations
- Physical examination needed
- No access to Internet
- No access to a smartphone, tablet or computer with a camera
- Not willing to activate their electronic patient portal
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Amsterdam UMC, location AMC
Amsterdam, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2020
First Posted
September 4, 2020
Study Start
June 1, 2017
Primary Completion
August 23, 2017
Study Completion
August 23, 2017
Last Updated
September 4, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR