A Comparative Study Between Open and Robotic Partial Nephrectomy in Treatment of High Complex Renal Tumors.
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare safety and efficacy between open and robotic partial nephrectomy in treatment of organ confined complex renal tumors (R.E.N.A.L score more than 7) as regarding surgical results, morbidity, clinical as well as oncological and functional outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 3, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2025
CompletedMarch 12, 2025
January 1, 2025
3.8 years
August 29, 2020
March 8, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Successful excision of the tumor.
Achieving successful excision of the tumor in both open and robotic partial nephrectomy without any operative or immediate post-operative complications.
two years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Status of recurrence free.
two years follow up.
Study Arms (2)
Open partial nephrectomy (Group A)
EXPERIMENTALpatients in this group will have open partial nephrectomy for their renal tumors.
Robotic partial nephrectomy (group B)
EXPERIMENTALpatients in this group will have robotic partial nephrectomy for their renal tumors.
Interventions
removal of tumor with sufficient safety margin with preservation of functioning renal unit (renal tissue with its collecting system, arterial supply and venous as well as lymphatic drainage).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Any patient aged more than 18 years old with high complex renal tumor according to R.E.N.A.L scoring system (R.E.N.A.L score more than 7).
You may not qualify if:
- Renal tumors with R.E.N.A.L score less than 7, based on radio-logical findings.
- Renal tumors in congenitally anomalous kidney (horseshoe kidney, ectopic or malformed) or metastatic kidney disease.
- Gross lymphadenopathy (N1 According to TNM classification system of renal tumors) or suspicious vascular invasion (T3a, T3b or T3c according to TNM classification of renal tumors) (18).
- Renal pelvic tumor of upper urinary tract. 5- Patient refused to be enrolled in the study. 6- Defaulters of follow up. 7- Bleeding tendency. 8- Active peritoneal or bowel inflammatory process. 9- Clinically unfit patient.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Assiut Urology Hospital
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 71515, Egypt
Related Publications (7)
Pavan N, Derweesh IH, Mir CM, Novara G, Hampton LJ, Ferro M, Perdona S, Parekh DJ, Porpiglia F, Autorino R. Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Large (>4 Cm) Kidney Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug;24(8):2420-2428. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5831-5. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
PMID: 28303428BACKGROUNDAlemozaffar M, Chang SL, Kacker R, Sun M, DeWolf WC, Wagner AA. Comparing costs of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2013 May;27(5):560-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0462. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
PMID: 23130756BACKGROUNDBoylu U, Basatac C, Yildirim U, Onol FF, Gumus E. Comparison of surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes of open and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. J Minim Access Surg. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):72-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.147699.
PMID: 25598603BACKGROUNDWu Z, Li M, Qu L, Ye H, Liu B, Yang Q, Sheng J, Xiao L, Lv C, Yang B, Gao X, Gao X, Xu C, Hou J, Sun Y, Wang L. A propensity-score matched comparison of perioperative and early renal functional outcomes of robotic versus open partial nephrectomy. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 7;9(4):e94195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094195. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24710511BACKGROUNDMinervini A, Vittori G, Antonelli A, Celia A, Crivellaro S, Dente D, Di Santo V, Frea B, Gacci M, Gritti A, Masieri L, Morlacco A, Porreca A, Rocco B, Parma P, Simeone C, Zaramella S, Carini M, Serni S. Open versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicenter comparison study of perioperative results and complications. World J Urol. 2014 Feb;32(1):287-93. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1136-x. Epub 2013 Aug 4.
PMID: 23913095BACKGROUNDWang Y, Shao J, Ma X, Du Q, Gong H, Zhang X. Robotic and open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: a matched-pair comparison with a long-term follow-up. World J Urol. 2017 Jan;35(1):73-80. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1849-8. Epub 2016 May 19.
PMID: 27194142BACKGROUNDKim JK, Lee H, Oh JJ, Lee S, Hong SK, Lee SE, Byun SS. Comparison of robotic and open partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal tumors (RENAL nephrometry score >/=10). PLoS One. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0210413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210413. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 30629644BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ahmed Kamel, M.A urology
Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Egypt
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant lecturer of Urology surgery.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2020
First Posted
September 3, 2020
Study Start
April 1, 2021
Primary Completion
January 1, 2025
Study Completion
February 1, 2025
Last Updated
March 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share