NCT04537221

Brief Summary

Around 7200 cases of Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer are diagnosed annually in the Nordic countries combined. Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer is an aggressive disease and it is linked with high mortality rates. The golden standard of treatment is radical cystectomy (RC) (the surgical removal of the bladder) and radical removal of lymph nodes in the pelvis. In addition to surgical treatment, and especially in cases where the tumour invades tissues surrounding the bladder or lymph nodes, chemotherapy is recommended. Chemotherapy can be administered before or after surgery, in a neoadjuvant (NAC) or adjuvant setting (AC). Although most patients recover well from surgery, there are significant risks regarding radical cystectomy. The greatest challenges in planning the treatment are making individual risk assessments and prognosis for the treated patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is also insufficiently used and it is hard to predict how the tumour responds to chemotherapy. The purpose of this study is to collect prospective clinical data on radical cystectomy -patients in co-operation with other Nordic countries: Sweden, Denmark, Iceland and Norway. The collected data is used to validate existing prediction tools and discover novel tools for prediction of morbidity related to RC and prediction of oncological outcome after RC. The study is divided into three sub-studies. Transfusions during RC and the time of hospitalization after the surgery are associated poorer oncological outcome when compared to those patients who do not need transfusions. The third study focuses on the oncological outcomes in patients receiving blood transfusions. As there are some conflicting reports and the finding is not properly validated, we aim to validate the effect of transfusions on survival after RC. The number of transfusions during RC and the time between surgery and discharge from hospital will be recorded. Patient cohort will be divided into patients receiving transfusions and not receiving transfusion. The primary end point is patients receiving transfusion and its effect on cancer specific mortality at 24 months. For patients receiving NAC, additional secondary end-point is complete response (pT0N0) rate at RC.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
1,700

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 19, 2020

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 3, 2020

Completed
27 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 30, 2020

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

November 25, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

August 19, 2020

Last Update Submit

November 23, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) effect on cancer specific mortality

    Comparison of cancer-specific-mortality between patients receiving one or more PBT perioperatively vs. patients receiving none

    24 months

Study Arms (2)

No transfusions

Patients receiving no perioperative blood transfusions (PBT)

Biological: Blood transfusion

Transfusions

Patients receiving perioperative blood transfusions (PBT)

Biological: Blood transfusion

Interventions

Transfusion of red blood cells peri-operatively

No transfusionsTransfusions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adult patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy -surgery

You may qualify if:

  • Histologically confirmed urinary BC planned to be treated with RC with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
  • Histologically confirmed urinary BC planned to be treated with palliative cystectomy
  • Signed informed consent
  • Patient age \>18 years

You may not qualify if:

  • RC for other reasons than BC
  • Other forms of surgical treatment of BC than RC (e.g. bladder resection).
  • Patient unwillingness to participate in the study for any reason (i.e. lack of signed consent).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital of Turku, Hospital Distric of Southwest Finland

Turku, Southwest Finland, 20521, Finland

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

Interventions

Blood Transfusion

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Biological TherapyTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Peter Boström, MD, PhD

    Turku University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Otto Ettala, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Ilkka Nikulainen, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
24 Months
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2020

First Posted

September 3, 2020

Study Start

September 30, 2020

Primary Completion

September 30, 2025

Study Completion

September 30, 2025

Last Updated

November 25, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations