NCT04537078

Brief Summary

The worldwide prevalence of primary and secondary infertility is estimated at \~2% and 10.5%, respectively, among women aged 20-44 years and attempting to conceive. Poor ovarian responders (PORs) involve 9-24% of patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF). proper tailoring of the ovarian stimulation protocol in order to maximize the number of oocytes collected represents a crucial step for them to eventually conceive. Recent evidence indicates that in the same menstrual cycle, there are multiple follicular recruitment waves. This coincides with the theory that folliculogenesis occurs in a wave-like fashion. Thus, within a single menstrual cycle, there can theoretically be multiple opportunities for a clinician to collect oocytes, as opposed to the conventional single cohort of antral follicles during the follicular phase. Utilizing this concept, clinicians have been attempting to retrieve oocytes from poor responders using both the follicular-phase stimulation (FPS) and the luteal-phase stimulation (LPS) protocols to increase the number of oocytes collected shorter within shorter period of time. By increasing the number of the retrieved oocytes collected, a better clinical can be assured since there is a clear relationship between the number of oocytes collected and live birth rates across all female age groups. which protocol is the most effective remains controversial and the efficacy of PPOS in POR compared with that of conventional protocols is unclear.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 28, 2020

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2020

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 3, 2020

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2021

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2021

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 17, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

February 17, 2022

Status Verified

January 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

August 28, 2020

Results QC Date

November 1, 2021

Last Update Submit

January 26, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • the Number of M2 Oocytes Retrieved

    it is the number of M2 oocytes retrieved that were being assessed after denudation

    1-2 hours after oocyte retrieval

  • the Fertilization Rate

    percentage transformation of micro injected oocytes into two pronuclei. it is done 16 to 20 hours after microinjection of the oocytes by the sperms

    16 to 20 hours after microinjection of the oocytes with the sperms

  • the Resultant Embryos Number

    it is the resultant embryos number counted day 3 or 4 or 5 after fertilization

    the embryos number counted day 3 or 4or 5 after fertilization

  • the Implantation Rate

    it is calculated as the number of intrauterine gestational sacs observed by transvaginal ultrasonography divided by the number of transferred embryos at the 6 th week of pregnancy and then multiplied by 100

    at the 6 th week of pregnancy

  • the Clinical Pregnancy Rate.

    percentage of cases in which observation of a gestational sac with fetal heart beat by transvaginal ultrasound at 6 weeks of pregnancy

    at the 6 th weeks of pregnancy

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • the Difference in the Ongoing Pregnancy Rate in Both Protocols.

    At the 20 th week of gestation

  • the Difference Between the Follicular Phase and the Luteal Phase of the Progestin Primed Double Stimulation Protocol Regarding the Total Days of Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation

    From the first day of ovarian stimulation till the last day of ovarian stimulation in each phase ,the follicular and the luteal, of stimulation

  • the Difference Between the Follicular Phase and the Luteal Phase of the Progestin Primed Double Stimulation Protocol Regarding the Total Dosage of Gonadotropins Used in the Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation

    From the first day of ovarian stimulation till the last day of ovarian stimulation in each phase ,the follicular and the luteal, of stimulation

  • the Difference Between the Follicular Phase and the Luteal Phase of the Progestin Primed Double Stimulation Protocol Regarding the Number of M2 Oocytes Retrieved

    1-2 hours after oocyte retrieval

  • the Difference Between the Follicular Phase and the Luteal Phase of the Progestin Primed Double Stimulation Protocol Regarding the Fertilization Rate.

    16 to 20 hours after microinjection of the oocytes with the sperms

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

the progestin primed double stimulation group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

luteal phase priming using combined contraceptive pills from day 21 of the previous cycle for one week by Gynera tab. Controlled ovarian hyper-stimulation with 225-375 IU of gonadotropins will be started day 2-3 of menses after vaginal ultrasound confirming the absence of ovarian cysts. Duphaston at 20 mg/day will be started from the first day of the ovulation induction.Decapeptyl in a dose of 2 ampules of 0.2 mg will be administered when leading follicle \>18 mm in diameter for triggering.Then, Controlled ovarian hyper-stimulation the next day after the previous oocyte pickup simultaneously with Duphaston. Starting from the next menstrual cycle Day 3, patients will receive oral estradiol valerate (Cyclo-Progynova (white tablets) daily.When endometrial thickness ≥ 7 mm.Embryo transfer will be scheduled on Day 3, 4 or 5 with maximum number of 3 class A embryos whether of cleavage or blastocyst stage.

Drug: DuphastonDrug: GonadotropinDrug: DecapeptylDrug: Combined Oral ContraceptiveDrug: Cyclo-ProgynovaDrug: progesterone

the flexible GnRh antagonist

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This step will be done twice in two different cycles In each cycle: luteal phase priming using combined contraceptive pills from day 21 of the previous cycle for one week by Gynera tab. Controlled ovarian hyper-stimulation using antagonist protocol will be used. Stimulation with 225-375 IU of gonadotropins will be started day 2-3 of menses after vaginal ultrasound confirming the absence of ovarian cysts. Cetrotide ampule will be given daily as the biggest oocyte reaches size 14 mm. Decapeptyl ampules 0.2 mg will be administered when leading follicle \>18 mm in diameter. While in the second cycle HCG triggering (Choriomon)in a dose of 10,000 IU will be administered when the leading follicle \>18 mm in diameter. Embryo transfer will be scheduled on Day 3, 4 or 5 with maximum number of 3 class A embryos whether of cleavage or blastocyst stage that will be a mixture of the thawed embryos of the first cycle and fresh embryos of the second cycle.

Drug: GonadotropinDrug: Cetrotide Injectable ProductDrug: DecapeptylDrug: Chorionic GonadotropinDrug: Combined Oral ContraceptiveDrug: Cyclo-ProgynovaDrug: progesterone

Interventions

will be used for pituitary suppression in the first arm:20 mg/day will be started from the first day of the ovulation induction in the follicular phase and in the luteal phase will be started the next day after oocyte pickup at 20 mg/day.

the progestin primed double stimulation group

will be used for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in both arms

Also known as: Fostimon, Menopure, Menogon, Gonapure
the flexible GnRh antagonistthe progestin primed double stimulation group

will used in the second arm for pituitary suppression in the second group daily when the biggest oocyte reaches size 14 mm till ovulation triggering

the flexible GnRh antagonist

will be used for ovulation triggering.in the first arm:in a dose of 2 ampules of 0.2 mg will be administered when leading follicle \>18 mm in diameter. in the second arm:in a dose of 2 ampules 0.2 mg will be administered when leading follicle \>18 mm in diameter in the first cycle only.

the flexible GnRh antagonistthe progestin primed double stimulation group

will be used in the second cycle of the second arm for ovulation triggering in a dose of 10,000 IU when the leading follicle \>18 mm in diameter.

Also known as: choriomon
the flexible GnRh antagonist

luteal phase priming from day 21 of the cycle before controlled ovarian stimulation for one week .

Also known as: Gynera
the flexible GnRh antagonistthe progestin primed double stimulation group

Starting from cycle Day 3 of the intented cycle for thawed embryo transfer, patients will receive the white tablets of Cyclo-Progynova daily. From Day 10 onwards, endometrium growth will be monitored by transvaginal ultrasound.

the flexible GnRh antagonistthe progestin primed double stimulation group

in the intended cycle of embryo transfer when endometrial thickness ≥ 7 mm. Progesterone administration (as 800 mg/day vaginal suppositories per day and 100 mg ampule IM every other day) will be continued until pregnancy testing 18 days after embryo transfer and in pregnant cases will continued till the 12 weeks of gestation.

Also known as: prontogest
the flexible GnRh antagonistthe progestin primed double stimulation group

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 45 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • poor ovarian responders patients defined by Bologna criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Male factor infertility due to azoospermia.
  • Patients with uncorrected uterine pathology.
  • Patients with the diagnosis of severe endometriosis.
  • Patients with BMI over 35.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Elshatby University Maternity Hospital

Alexandria, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356. Epub 2012 Dec 18.

    PMID: 23271957BACKGROUND
  • Briggs R, Kovacs G, MacLachlan V, Motteram C, Baker HW. Can you ever collect too many oocytes? Hum Reprod. 2015 Jan;30(1):81-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu272. Epub 2014 Oct 31.

    PMID: 25362088BACKGROUND
  • Drakopoulos P, Blockeel C, Stoop D, Camus M, de Vos M, Tournaye H, Polyzos NP. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos? Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;31(2):370-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev316. Epub 2016 Jan 2.

    PMID: 26724797BACKGROUND
  • Baerwald AR, Adams GP, Pierson RA. Ovarian antral folliculogenesis during the human menstrual cycle: a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):73-91. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr039. Epub 2011 Nov 8.

    PMID: 22068695BACKGROUND
  • Vanden Brink H, Chizen D, Hale G, Baerwald A. Age-related changes in major ovarian follicular wave dynamics during the human menstrual cycle. Menopause. 2013 Dec;20(12):1243-54. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e31828cfb62.

    PMID: 23571519BACKGROUND
  • Kuang Y, Chen Q, Hong Q, Lyu Q, Ai A, Fu Y, Shoham Z. Double stimulations during the follicular and luteal phases of poor responders in IVF/ICSI programmes (Shanghai protocol). Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Dec;29(6):684-91. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Sep 6.

    PMID: 25444501BACKGROUND
  • Zhang J. Luteal phase ovarian stimulation following oocyte retrieval: is it helpful for poor responders? Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015 Jul 25;13:76. doi: 10.1186/s12958-015-0076-2.

    PMID: 26209449BACKGROUND
  • Liu C, Jiang H, Zhang W, Yin H. Double ovarian stimulation during the follicular and luteal phase in women >/=38 years: a retrospective case-control study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Dec;35(6):678-684. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.08.019. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

    PMID: 29030068BACKGROUND
  • Zhang Q, Guo XM, Li Y. Implantation rates subsequent to the transfer of embryos produced at different phases during double stimulation of poor ovarian responders. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2017 Jun;29(6):1178-1183. doi: 10.1071/RD16020.

    PMID: 27166216BACKGROUND
  • Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1768-74. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der106. Epub 2011 May 10.

    PMID: 21558332BACKGROUND
  • Wang N, Wang Y, Chen Q, Dong J, Tian H, Fu Y, Ai A, Lyu Q, Kuang Y. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs conventional ovarian stimulation in patients with normal ovarian reserve treated for IVF: a large retrospective cohort study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2016 May;84(5):720-8. doi: 10.1111/cen.12983. Epub 2015 Dec 21.

    PMID: 26603821BACKGROUND
  • McNatty KP, Hillier SG, van den Boogaard AM, Trimbos-Kemper TC, Reichert LE Jr, van Hall EV. Follicular development during the luteal phase of the human menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983 May;56(5):1022-31. doi: 10.1210/jcem-56-5-1022.

    PMID: 6403567BACKGROUND
  • Moffat R, Pirtea P, Gayet V, Wolf JP, Chapron C, de Ziegler D. Dual ovarian stimulation is a new viable option for enhancing the oocyte yield when the time for assisted reproductive technnology is limited. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Dec;29(6):659-61. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.08.010. Epub 2014 Sep 4.

    PMID: 25311972BACKGROUND
  • Kuang Y, Chen Q, Fu Y, Wang Y, Hong Q, Lyu Q, Ai A, Shoham Z. Medroxyprogesterone acetate is an effective oral alternative for preventing premature luteinizing hormone surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2015 Jul;104(1):62-70.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.022. Epub 2015 May 5.

    PMID: 25956370BACKGROUND
  • Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L; ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1616-24. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der092. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

    PMID: 21505041BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Infertility, Female

Interventions

DydrogesteroneGonadotropinsMenotropinsTriptorelin PamoateChorionic GonadotropinContraceptives, Oral, CombinedProgesterone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital DiseasesInfertility

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PregnadienesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsPeptide HormonesHormonesHormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone AntagonistsGonadotropins, PituitaryPituitary Hormones, AnteriorPituitary HormonesPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsBiological ProductsComplex MixturesGonadotropin-Releasing HormonePituitary Hormone-Releasing HormonesHypothalamic HormonesNeuropeptidesOligopeptidesNerve Tissue ProteinsProteinsPlacental HormonesPregnancy ProteinsDrug CombinationsPharmaceutical PreparationsContraceptives, OralContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive AgentsReproductive Control AgentsPhysiological Effects of DrugsPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and UsesTherapeutic UsesPregnenedionesPregnenesCorpus Luteum HormonesGonadal HormonesProgesterone CongenersGonadal Steroid Hormones

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Aly Hussein
Organization
Elshatby University Maternity Hospital

Study Officials

  • Aly A Hussein, Ass.lecturer

    Elshatby University hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Sherif S Gaafar, Professor

    Elshatby University hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant lecturer, University of Alexandria

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2020

First Posted

September 3, 2020

Study Start

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion

March 1, 2021

Study Completion

September 1, 2021

Last Updated

February 17, 2022

Results First Posted

February 17, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations