MICRA - Pilot Study
MICRA
Contribution of Confocal Microscopy in the Diagnosis of Acute Cell Rejection ACR in Lung Transplantation: Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acute cell rejection is a common complication of lung transplantation. The pathological diagnosis is based on the performance of transbronchial biopsies which are associated with a significant risk of potentially severe pneumothorax and hemoptysis. Confocal microscopy performed during bronchial endoscopy provides real-time images of the lungs on a microscopic scale. Thus, it is possible to visualize the alveoli, capillaries and intra-alveolar inflammatory cells. So far, work on the subject has only investigated the ability of this technique to determine the presence of acute cell rejection on post-fibroscopy analysis. Our hypothesis is that the absence of airway inflammation seen during the procedure by confocal microscopy is able to rule out the diagnosis of ACR and avoid the performance of transbronchial biopsies. Our job is to first assess the feasibility of the per-procedure evaluation and determine a decision algorithm. If the result is conclusive, a larger study will be carried out to assess the negative predictive value of this approach for the diagnosis of acute cell rejection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 3, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 23, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 18, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 18, 2021
CompletedOctober 6, 2021
March 1, 2021
11 months
August 24, 2020
October 5, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Determine ability of the operator
The main objective of this study is to determine the ability of the operator to obtain and interpret confocal microscopy images per procedure. analyzes in real time the images provided by the confocal microscopy probe. the operator determines the presence of intra-alveolar inflammatory cells and evaluates the vessel wall. On the basis of this per-procedure analysis, if the operator considers the interpretation possible, he declares whether he concludes that the presence of pulmonary inflammation is consistent with the diagnosis of rejection.
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Adverse effects
1 day
ability of confocal microscopy to eliminate acute cellular rejection
1 day
Correlation confocal microscopy and proven infection
1 day
Correlation inter operator
1 day
Study Arms (1)
Microscopy confocal
EXPERIMENTALThe fibroscopy is carried out according to the usual procedure of the service. During the fibroscopy, for all patient, the confocal microscopy procedure begins. After the end of confocal procedure, 5 to 6 transbronchial biopsies are performing
Interventions
At this stage, the confocal microscopy procedure begins: Taking pictures for post-procedure analysis in 4 different territories. For each territory, the investigator need to get a snapshot of a vascular structure and a snapshot of an alveolus. Analysis per procedure: the same operator analyzes the alveoli deemed to be representative in real time. It determines the presence of intra-alveolar inflammatory cells and answers the question of the main criterion: possible interpretation in confocal microscopy? YES / NO, the clinical researcher immediately notes the answer in the CRF. Based on this per-procedure analysis, if he deems the interpretation possible, the operator declares if he concludes that pulmonary inflammation is present YES / NO, the response is noted immediately in the CRF. The fibroscopy procedure is then resumed as usual in the department, namely:
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Follow-up by the Nantes University Hospital team for a lung transplant
- Having given their consent
- Clinical suspicion of acute cellular rejection OR systematic fibroscopy post transplantation to screen for acute asymptomatic rejection
You may not qualify if:
- Minor or adult patient under guardianship and protected person
- Bleeding disorder
- Pneumothorax existing before the performance of the fibroscopy
- Active smoking less than 1 year old
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU Nantes
Nantes, France
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adrien TISSOT, MD
Nantes University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2020
First Posted
September 3, 2020
Study Start
September 23, 2020
Primary Completion
August 18, 2021
Study Completion
August 18, 2021
Last Updated
October 6, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03