NCT04536883

Brief Summary

Acute cell rejection is a common complication of lung transplantation. The pathological diagnosis is based on the performance of transbronchial biopsies which are associated with a significant risk of potentially severe pneumothorax and hemoptysis. Confocal microscopy performed during bronchial endoscopy provides real-time images of the lungs on a microscopic scale. Thus, it is possible to visualize the alveoli, capillaries and intra-alveolar inflammatory cells. So far, work on the subject has only investigated the ability of this technique to determine the presence of acute cell rejection on post-fibroscopy analysis. Our hypothesis is that the absence of airway inflammation seen during the procedure by confocal microscopy is able to rule out the diagnosis of ACR and avoid the performance of transbronchial biopsies. Our job is to first assess the feasibility of the per-procedure evaluation and determine a decision algorithm. If the result is conclusive, a larger study will be carried out to assess the negative predictive value of this approach for the diagnosis of acute cell rejection.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 24, 2020

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 3, 2020

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 23, 2020

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 18, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 18, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

October 6, 2021

Status Verified

March 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

August 24, 2020

Last Update Submit

October 5, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Confocal MicroscopyAcute cell rejectionLung Transplantation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Determine ability of the operator

    The main objective of this study is to determine the ability of the operator to obtain and interpret confocal microscopy images per procedure. analyzes in real time the images provided by the confocal microscopy probe. the operator determines the presence of intra-alveolar inflammatory cells and evaluates the vessel wall. On the basis of this per-procedure analysis, if the operator considers the interpretation possible, he declares whether he concludes that the presence of pulmonary inflammation is consistent with the diagnosis of rejection.

    1 day

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Adverse effects

    1 day

  • ability of confocal microscopy to eliminate acute cellular rejection

    1 day

  • Correlation confocal microscopy and proven infection

    1 day

  • Correlation inter operator

    1 day

Study Arms (1)

Microscopy confocal

EXPERIMENTAL

The fibroscopy is carried out according to the usual procedure of the service. During the fibroscopy, for all patient, the confocal microscopy procedure begins. After the end of confocal procedure, 5 to 6 transbronchial biopsies are performing

Procedure: microscopy confocal

Interventions

At this stage, the confocal microscopy procedure begins: Taking pictures for post-procedure analysis in 4 different territories. For each territory, the investigator need to get a snapshot of a vascular structure and a snapshot of an alveolus. Analysis per procedure: the same operator analyzes the alveoli deemed to be representative in real time. It determines the presence of intra-alveolar inflammatory cells and answers the question of the main criterion: possible interpretation in confocal microscopy? YES / NO, the clinical researcher immediately notes the answer in the CRF. Based on this per-procedure analysis, if he deems the interpretation possible, the operator declares if he concludes that pulmonary inflammation is present YES / NO, the response is noted immediately in the CRF. The fibroscopy procedure is then resumed as usual in the department, namely:

Microscopy confocal

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Follow-up by the Nantes University Hospital team for a lung transplant
  • Having given their consent
  • Clinical suspicion of acute cellular rejection OR systematic fibroscopy post transplantation to screen for acute asymptomatic rejection

You may not qualify if:

  • Minor or adult patient under guardianship and protected person
  • Bleeding disorder
  • Pneumothorax existing before the performance of the fibroscopy
  • Active smoking less than 1 year old

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHU Nantes

Nantes, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Microscopy, Confocal

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MicroscopyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Adrien TISSOT, MD

    Nantes University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2020

First Posted

September 3, 2020

Study Start

September 23, 2020

Primary Completion

August 18, 2021

Study Completion

August 18, 2021

Last Updated

October 6, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-03

Locations