Flow Controlled Ventilation in Thoracic Surgery
Flow Controlled Ventilation Versus Pressure Controlled Ventilation in Thoracic Surgery With One Lung Ventilation - a Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This trial investigates effects of individualized (by compliance guided pressure settings) flow-controlled ventilation compared to best clinical practice pressure-controlled ventilation in thoracic surgery requiring one lung ventilation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 13, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 29, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 16, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 16, 2022
CompletedDecember 16, 2024
February 1, 2020
1.3 years
August 13, 2020
December 10, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
paO2 / FiO2 ratio (Horowitz Index)
Comparison of oxygenation assessed by arterial partial pressure of oxygen (paO2) / fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2)
after 30 minutes of one lung ventilation
Secondary Outcomes (18)
decarboxylation (paCO2)
during two lung ventilation in supine position after anesthesia induction (T1) and change to lateral position (T2), after 15 (T3), 30 (T4) and 60 minutes (T5) of one lung ventilation and after reinflation before tracheal extubation (T6)
venous admixture (Qs / Qt)
during two lung ventilation in supine position after anesthesia induction (T1) and change to lateral position (T2), after 15 (T3), 30 (T4) and 60 minutes (T5) of one lung ventilation and after reinflation before tracheal extubation (T6)
respiratory minute volume
during two lung ventilation in supine position after anesthesia induction (T1) and change to lateral position (T2), after 15 (T3), 30 (T4) and 60 minutes (T5) of one lung ventilation and after reinflation before tracheal extubation (T6)
respiratory rate
during two lung ventilation in supine position after anesthesia induction (T1) and change to lateral position (T2), after 15 (T3), 30 (T4) and 60 minutes (T5) of one lung ventilation and after reinflation before tracheal extubation (T6)
tidal volume
during two lung ventilation in supine position after anesthesia induction (T1) and change to lateral position (T2), after 15 (T3), 30 (T4) and 60 minutes (T5) of one lung ventilation and after reinflation before tracheal extubation (T6)
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
FCV
EXPERIMENTALArtificial ventilation will be performed with individualized flow-controlled ventilation (Evone, Ventinova Medical B.V., Eindhoven, the Netherlands) during thoracic surgery. Individualization will be established by compliance guided end-expiratory and peak pressure setting during two lung ventilation as well as one lung ventilation, flow setting will be adjusted to secure normocapnia during two lung ventilation and the targeted paCO2 during one lung ventilation is 40-60 mmHg, provided that pH \>7.2. The I:E ratio will be set to 1:1. The FiO2 will be set to achieve normoxia during two lung ventilation, increased to 100% before lung isolation and after 15 minutes of one-lung ventilation again decreased to secure normoxia or mild hyperoxia (target paO2 of 75-120 mmHg). No recruitment maneuver will be performed for re-inflation of the separated lung and after regain of spontaneous breathing tracheal extubation performed in the operating room.
PCV
ACTIVE COMPARATORArtificial ventilation will be performed with pressure-controlled ventilation (Primus, Dräger, Lübeck, Germany) during thoracic surgery. Peak pressure will be set to achieve a tidal volume of 6-8 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW) at a compliance titrated positive end-expiratory pressure during two lung ventilation and the tidal volume will be reduced to 4-6 ml/kg PBW during one lung ventilation. Respiratory rate will be set to maintain normocapnia during two lung ventilation and a targeted paCO2 level during one lung ventilation of 40-60 mmHg, provided that pH \> 7.2. The I:E ratio will be set to 1:1.5 except extension of expiration is necessary in order to avoid air trapping. The FiO2 will be set to achieve normoxia during two lung ventilation, increased to 100% before lung isolation until 15 minutes of one lung ventilation and decreased thereafter to achieve a targeted paO2 level of 75-120 mmHg. For re-inflation a manual recruitment maneuver will be performed under surgical guidance.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female subjects ≥ 18 years
- Body weight ≥ 40 kg
- Elective thoracic surgery requiring OLV
- ASA I-III
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Emergency surgery
- Female subjects known to be pregnant
- Known participation in another interventional clinical trial
- high pulmonary risk (ppo FEV1\<20ml/kg in male or ppo FEV1\<18ml/kg in female)
- Empyema evacuation or signs of pulmonary infection
- High grade CMP (EF\<30%)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical University Innsbruck
Innsbruck, Tyrol, 6020, Austria
Related Publications (4)
Jammer I, Wickboldt N, Sander M, Smith A, Schultz MJ, Pelosi P, Leva B, Rhodes A, Hoeft A, Walder B, Chew MS, Pearse RM; European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM); European Society of Anaesthesiology; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint taskforce on perioperative outcome measures. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):88-105. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000118.
PMID: 25058504BACKGROUNDSchmidt J, Wenzel C, Mahn M, Spassov S, Cristina Schmitz H, Borgmann S, Lin Z, Haberstroh J, Meckel S, Eiden S, Wirth S, Buerkle H, Schumann S. Improved lung recruitment and oxygenation during mandatory ventilation with a new expiratory ventilation assistance device: A controlled interventional trial in healthy pigs. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Oct;35(10):736-744. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000819.
PMID: 29734208BACKGROUNDWeber J, Schmidt J, Straka L, Wirth S, Schumann S. Flow-controlled ventilation improves gas exchange in lung-healthy patients- a randomized interventional cross-over study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Apr;64(4):481-488. doi: 10.1111/aas.13526. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
PMID: 31828755BACKGROUNDWeber J, Straka L, Borgmann S, Schmidt J, Wirth S, Schumann S. Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) improves regional ventilation in obese patients - a randomized controlled crossover trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jan 28;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-0944-y.
PMID: 31992213BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Judith Martini, MD
Medical University Innsbruck, Dept. of Anaesthesiology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 13, 2020
First Posted
September 1, 2020
Study Start
October 29, 2020
Primary Completion
February 16, 2022
Study Completion
February 16, 2022
Last Updated
December 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share