NCT04531774

Brief Summary

The healthcare industry is inherently demanding, stressful, and, at times, emotionally draining. On a typical day, many workers must make rapid and critical decisions, manage numerous demands, team conflicts, and challenging situations with patients and their families. For some health care workers (HCW), the current pandemic - COVID-19 - has also exacerbated these challenges. Providing psychological support is key in alleviating stress among HCWs, yet the situation does not require therapy because HCWs do not principally suffer from a mental disorder. RECHARGE was specifically developed for HCWs and is an abbreviated online version of Problem Management Plus, an evidence-based intervention that helps to cope with stress in times of crisis. As a brief psychological intervention for adults affected by adversity emerging from stress exposure, RECHARGE teaches people three well-documented strategies to manage acute stress (a: managing stress, b: managing worry, c: meaningful activity). It includes psychoeducation, arousal reduction techniques, managing worries and problem-solving skills, behavioral activation, and enhancement of meaningful activities, which are all based on the principles of cognitive-behavioral therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of RECHARGE to reduce stress in HCWs and enhance their work performance. Participants in this randomized controlled trial (RCT) study are randomly assigned to either RECHARGE or the active control group. To this end, stress including symptoms of burnout, worries, anxiety, depression, PTSD, and work performance will be measured at baseline, post-intervention, and at a 2 and 6 month follow up.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
160

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 26, 2020

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 28, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 28, 2020

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

October 19, 2020

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

August 26, 2020

Last Update Submit

October 14, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Health Care WorkersStressAnxietyDepressionBurnoutWork LoadCOVID-19ResilienceBrief Psychological Intervention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from Baseline in psychological distress Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) at Week 5 and Week 13

    HCWs in the intervention condition (RECHARGE) demonstrate a lower level of distress after the intervention and at 2-month follow-up than HCWs in the active control condition.

    Baseline (Week 1), post-intervention (Week 5) and 2 month follow-up (Week 13)

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Fewer worries in intervention group than in active control group

    post-intervention (Week 5) and 2 month follow-up (Week 13)

  • Less anxiety symptoms in intervention group than in active control group

    post-intervention (Week 5) and 2 month follow-up (Week 13)

  • Fewer depression symptoms in intervention group than in active control group

    post-intervention (Week 5) and 2 month follow-up (Week 13)

  • Lower level of burnout in intervention group than in active control group

    post-intervention (Week 5) and 2 month follow-up (Week 13)

  • Less traumatic stress in intervention group than in active control group

    post-intervention (Week 5) and 2 month follow-up (Week 13)

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

RECHARGE

EXPERIMENTAL

4 1-hour sessions of RECHARGE are delivered online using Skype for Business within 2 weeks.

Behavioral: RECHARGE

Online self-study of stress management strategies

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Self study during 2 weeks.

Behavioral: Self Study

Interventions

RECHARGEBEHAVIORAL

RECHARGE is an abbreviated and adapted version of Problem Management Plus (PM+), an evidence-based intervention that helps to cope with stress in times of crisis. Recharge is specifically developed for HCWs as a brief psychological intervention for adults affected by adversity emerging from stress exposure and teaches people three well-documented strategies to manage acute stress. The strategies are: a) managing stress, b) managing worry, c) meaningful activity. It includes psychoeducation, arousal reduction techniques, managing worries and problem-solving skills, behavioural activation, enhancement of meaningful activities, and relapse prevention, which are all based on the principles of cognitive-behavioural therapy. RECHARGE is delivered online in a 1 to 1 setting between coach and participant. Trained peers (medical doctors, nurses, psychologists) act as coaches.

RECHARGE
Self StudyBEHAVIORAL

HCWs are referred to a few recommended webpages that outline well-validated, adaptive coping strategies for managing stress.

Online self-study of stress management strategies

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Anxiety and depression checklist (K10) score of 16 or higher
  • Healthcare worker
  • Sufficient German language comprehension
  • Access to teleconferencing platform

You may not qualify if:

  • Currently participating in a similar study
  • Currently in psychotherapeutic treatment / coaching
  • Currently on sick leave for more than 2 weeks

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Klinik fĂ¼r Konsiliarpsychiatrie und Psychosomatik

Zurich, 8091, Switzerland

RECRUITING

Related Publications (32)

  • Tam CW, Pang EP, Lam LC, Chiu HF. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Hong Kong in 2003: stress and psychological impact among frontline healthcare workers. Psychol Med. 2004 Oct;34(7):1197-204. doi: 10.1017/s0033291704002247.

    PMID: 15697046BACKGROUND
  • Nickell LA, Crighton EJ, Tracy CS, Al-Enazy H, Bolaji Y, Hanjrah S, Hussain A, Makhlouf S, Upshur RE. Psychosocial effects of SARS on hospital staff: survey of a large tertiary care institution. CMAJ. 2004 Mar 2;170(5):793-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1031077.

    PMID: 14993174BACKGROUND
  • Grace SL, Hershenfield K, Robertson E, Stewart DE. Factors affecting perceived risk of contracting severe acute respiratory syndrome among academic physicians. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004 Dec;25(12):1111-3. doi: 10.1086/502352.

    PMID: 15636301BACKGROUND
  • Ho SM, Kwong-Lo RS, Mak CW, Wong JS. Fear of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) among health care workers. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Apr;73(2):344-9. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.2.344.

    PMID: 15796643BACKGROUND
  • Maunder RG, Lancee WJ, Rourke S, Hunter JJ, Goldbloom D, Balderson K, Petryshen P, Steinberg R, Wasylenki D, Koh D, Fones CS. Factors associated with the psychological impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on nurses and other hospital workers in Toronto. Psychosom Med. 2004 Nov-Dec;66(6):938-42. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000145673.84698.18.

    PMID: 15564361BACKGROUND
  • Bai Y, Lin CC, Lin CY, Chen JY, Chue CM, Chou P. Survey of stress reactions among health care workers involved with the SARS outbreak. Psychiatr Serv. 2004 Sep;55(9):1055-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.55.9.1055.

    PMID: 15345768BACKGROUND
  • Styra R, Hawryluck L, Robinson S, Kasapinovic S, Fones C, Gold WL. Impact on health care workers employed in high-risk areas during the Toronto SARS outbreak. J Psychosom Res. 2008 Feb;64(2):177-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.07.015.

    PMID: 18222131BACKGROUND
  • Marjanovic Z, Greenglass ER, Coffey S. The relevance of psychosocial variables and working conditions in predicting nurses' coping strategies during the SARS crisis: an online questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Aug;44(6):991-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.02.012. Epub 2006 Apr 17.

    PMID: 16618485BACKGROUND
  • Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, Rubin GJ. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

    PMID: 32112714BACKGROUND
  • The Lancet. COVID-19: protecting health-care workers. Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):922. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30644-9. No abstract available.

    PMID: 32199474BACKGROUND
  • Remuzzi A, Remuzzi G. COVID-19 and Italy: what next? Lancet. 2020 Apr 11;395(10231):1225-1228. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30627-9. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

    PMID: 32178769BACKGROUND
  • Su TP, Lien TC, Yang CY, Su YL, Wang JH, Tsai SL, Yin JC. Prevalence of psychiatric morbidity and psychological adaptation of the nurses in a structured SARS caring unit during outbreak: a prospective and periodic assessment study in Taiwan. J Psychiatr Res. 2007 Jan-Feb;41(1-2):119-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2005.12.006. Epub 2006 Feb 7.

    PMID: 16460760BACKGROUND
  • Maunder RG, Leszcz M, Savage D, Adam MA, Peladeau N, Romano D, Rose M, Schulman B. Applying the lessons of SARS to pandemic influenza: an evidence-based approach to mitigating the stress experienced by healthcare workers. Can J Public Health. 2008 Nov-Dec;99(6):486-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03403782.

    PMID: 19149392BACKGROUND
  • Maunder RG, Lancee WJ, Balderson KE, Bennett JP, Borgundvaag B, Evans S, Fernandes CM, Goldbloom DS, Gupta M, Hunter JJ, McGillis Hall L, Nagle LM, Pain C, Peczeniuk SS, Raymond G, Read N, Rourke SB, Steinberg RJ, Stewart TE, VanDeVelde-Coke S, Veldhorst GG, Wasylenki DA. Long-term psychological and occupational effects of providing hospital healthcare during SARS outbreak. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Dec;12(12):1924-32. doi: 10.3201/eid1212.060584.

    PMID: 17326946BACKGROUND
  • Shanafelt TD, Noseworthy JH. Executive Leadership and Physician Well-being: Nine Organizational Strategies to Promote Engagement and Reduce Burnout. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Jan;92(1):129-146. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Nov 18.

    PMID: 27871627BACKGROUND
  • Panagioti M, Geraghty K, Johnson J, Zhou A, Panagopoulou E, Chew-Graham C, Peters D, Hodkinson A, Riley R, Esmail A. Association Between Physician Burnout and Patient Safety, Professionalism, and Patient Satisfaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1317-1331. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3713.

    PMID: 30193239BACKGROUND
  • Scheepers RA, Boerebach BC, Arah OA, Heineman MJ, Lombarts KM. A Systematic Review of the Impact of Physicians' Occupational Well-Being on the Quality of Patient Care. Int J Behav Med. 2015 Dec;22(6):683-98. doi: 10.1007/s12529-015-9473-3.

    PMID: 25733349BACKGROUND
  • Wallace JE, Lemaire JB, Ghali WA. Physician wellness: a missing quality indicator. Lancet. 2009 Nov 14;374(9702):1714-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61424-0.

    PMID: 19914516BACKGROUND
  • Zhu Z, Xu S, Wang H, Liu Z, Wu J, Li G, Miao J, Zhang C, Yang Y, Sun W, Zhu S, Fan Y, Chen Y, Hu J, Liu J, Wang W. COVID-19 in Wuhan: Sociodemographic characteristics and hospital support measures associated with the immediate psychological impact on healthcare workers. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jun 24;24:100443. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100443. eCollection 2020 Jul.

    PMID: 32766545BACKGROUND
  • Liu CY, Yang YZ, Zhang XM, Xu X, Dou QL, Zhang WW, Cheng ASK. The prevalence and influencing factors in anxiety in medical workers fighting COVID-19 in China: a cross-sectional survey. Epidemiol Infect. 2020 May 20;148:e98. doi: 10.1017/S0950268820001107.

    PMID: 32430088BACKGROUND
  • Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, Cai Z, Hu J, Wei N, Wu J, Du H, Chen T, Li R, Tan H, Kang L, Yao L, Huang M, Wang H, Wang G, Liu Z, Hu S. Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e203976. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976.

    PMID: 32202646BACKGROUND
  • Maunder R. The experience of the 2003 SARS outbreak as a traumatic stress among frontline healthcare workers in Toronto: lessons learned. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Jul 29;359(1447):1117-25. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1483.

    PMID: 15306398BACKGROUND
  • Chan AO, Huak CY. Psychological impact of the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak on health care workers in a medium size regional general hospital in Singapore. Occup Med (Lond). 2004 May;54(3):190-6. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqh027.

    PMID: 15133143BACKGROUND
  • Dawson KS, Bryant RA, Harper M, Kuowei Tay A, Rahman A, Schafer A, van Ommeren M. Problem Management Plus (PM+): a WHO transdiagnostic psychological intervention for common mental health problems. World Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;14(3):354-7. doi: 10.1002/wps.20255. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26407793BACKGROUND
  • Rahman A, Hamdani SU, Awan NR, Bryant RA, Dawson KS, Khan MF, Azeemi MM, Akhtar P, Nazir H, Chiumento A, Sijbrandij M, Wang D, Farooq S, van Ommeren M. Effect of a Multicomponent Behavioral Intervention in Adults Impaired by Psychological Distress in a Conflict-Affected Area of Pakistan: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Dec 27;316(24):2609-2617. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17165.

    PMID: 27837602BACKGROUND
  • Rahman A, Khan MN, Hamdani SU, Chiumento A, Akhtar P, Nazir H, Nisar A, Masood A, Din IU, Khan NA, Bryant RA, Dawson KS, Sijbrandij M, Wang D, van Ommeren M. Effectiveness of a brief group psychological intervention for women in a post-conflict setting in Pakistan: a single-blind, cluster, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 Apr 27;393(10182):1733-1744. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32343-2. Epub 2019 Apr 1.

    PMID: 30948286BACKGROUND
  • Bryant RA, Schafer A, Dawson KS, Anjuri D, Mulili C, Ndogoni L, Koyiet P, Sijbrandij M, Ulate J, Harper Shehadeh M, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, van Ommeren M. Effectiveness of a brief behavioural intervention on psychological distress among women with a history of gender-based violence in urban Kenya: A randomised clinical trial. PLoS Med. 2017 Aug 15;14(8):e1002371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002371. eCollection 2017 Aug.

    PMID: 28809935BACKGROUND
  • Kessler RC, Barker PR, Colpe LJ, Epstein JF, Gfroerer JC, Hiripi E, Howes MJ, Normand SL, Manderscheid RW, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM. Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;60(2):184-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184.

    PMID: 12578436BACKGROUND
  • Slade T, Grove R, Burgess P. Kessler Psychological Distress Scale: normative data from the 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;45(4):308-16. doi: 10.3109/00048674.2010.543653. Epub 2011 Feb 21.

    PMID: 21332432BACKGROUND
  • Price M, Szafranski DD, van Stolk-Cooke K, Gros DF. Investigation of abbreviated 4 and 8 item versions of the PTSD Checklist 5. Psychiatry Res. 2016 May 30;239:124-30. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Mar 8.

    PMID: 27137973BACKGROUND
  • Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.

    PMID: 6880820BACKGROUND
  • Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.

    PMID: 16717171BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Burnout, PsychologicalAnxiety DisordersDepressionCOVID-19

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Stress, PsychologicalBehavioral SymptomsBehaviorMental DisordersPneumonia, ViralPneumoniaRespiratory Tract InfectionsInfectionsVirus DiseasesCoronavirus InfectionsCoronaviridae InfectionsNidovirales InfectionsRNA Virus InfectionsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • Naser Morina, PhD

    University of Zurich

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Naser Morina, PhD

CONTACT

Sonja Weilenmann, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PD Dr. Naser Morina

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2020

First Posted

August 28, 2020

Study Start

August 28, 2020

Primary Completion

June 1, 2021

Study Completion

June 1, 2021

Last Updated

October 19, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

We follow open science practices and will use open access journals and repositories to publish results, anonymized original data, and meta-data describing the data and procedures (e.g., study protocol, statistical codes, instructions concerning the use of the data) to ensure full transparency and reproducibility.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
One year after conclusion of the study.

Locations