Testing the Effectiveness of Coping With Cancer in the Kitchen

NCT04528615 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: 19048-01
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 53
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The study was a two-arm, randomized controlled trial in which cancer survivors were evenly assigned to either receive the 8-week CCK in-person nutrition intervention immediately or to become the control group that received a selection of CCK printed materials. The aim was to test the effectiveness of CCK for implementing a healthy plant-based diet and improving quality of life.

Conditions

Cancer; Nutrition Aspect of Cancer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

• Knowledge about the role of a plant-based diet in cancer risk reduction

  Change from baseline in knowledge about role of consuming a predominantly plant-based diet and cancer risk. Participants rated their agreement (1 = Strongly disagree; 5 = Strongly agree) with six custom items developed by the research team, e.g., "I understand the benefits of consuming whole grains versus processed grains". A composite score was calculated as the average of the 6 ratings (range 1-5; Cronbach's alpha=.80).

  9 weeks

• Knowledge about the role of a plant-based diet in cancer risk reduction

  Change from baseline in knowledge about role of consuming a predominantly plant-based diet and cancer risk. Participants rated their agreement (1 = Strongly disagree; 5 = Strongly agree) with six custom items developed by the research team, e.g., "I understand the benefits of consuming whole grains versus processed grains". A composite score was calculated as the average of the 6 ratings (range 1-5; Cronbach's alpha=.80).

  15 weeks

• Confidence preparing a variety of plant-based foods

  Change from baseline in confidence to prepare a variety of plant-based foods. Participants indicated "How sure are you that you could prepare the foods listed below in a tasty way?" (1 = Very unsure; 5 = Very sure). The 14-item scale included: 4 whole grains; 4 beans, seeds and legumes; 3 green leafy vegetables; and 3 mixed foods, e.g. healthy one-pot meals. A composite score was calculated as the average of the 14 items (range 1-5; Cronbach's alpha=.75).

  9 weeks

• Confidence preparing a variety of plant-based foods

  Change from baseline in confidence to prepare a variety of plant-based foods. Participants indicated "How sure are you that you could prepare the foods listed below in a tasty way?" (1 = Very unsure; 5 = Very sure). The 14-item scale included: 4 whole grains; 4 beans, seeds and legumes; 3 green leafy vegetables; and 3 mixed foods, e.g. healthy one-pot meals. A composite score was calculated as the average of the 14 items (range 1-5; Cronbach's alpha=.75).

  15 weeks

• Skills to practice a plant-based diet

  Change from baseline in skills to practice a plant-based diet. Participants rated their agreement (1 = Strongly disagree; 5 = Strongly agree) with five custom items developed by the research team, e.g., "I am confident that I can create a kitchen environment that makes it easier to store, prepare, and consume fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and beans."; the average of the five ratings was calculated to create a skills composite score (range 1-5; Cronbach's alpha=.88).

  9 weeks

• Skills to practice a plant-based diet

  Change from baseline in skills to practice a plant-based diet. Participants rated their agreement (1 = Strongly disagree; 5 = Strongly agree) with five custom items developed by the research team, e.g., "I am confident that I can create a kitchen environment that makes it easier to store, prepare, and consume fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and beans."; the average of the five ratings was calculated to create a skills composite score (range 1-5; Cronbach's alpha=.88).

  15 weeks

• Barriers to eating more fruits and vegetables and whole grains

  Change from baseline in barriers to eating more fruits and vegetables and whole grains. We adapted items from an existing barriers instrument to measure perceived barriers to eating more fruits and vegetables (F\&V) (average score of 15 items; Cronbach's alpha = .89) and whole grains (average score of 14 items; Cronbach's alpha = .83). Participants were asked the general question, "Listed below are some common reasons why people don't eat more servings of vegetables and fruits each day. Indicate whether or not this is a reason for you by marking how much you agree or disagree." (1 = Strongly disagree; 5 = Strongly agree). In addition, using the same list of possible reasons (excluding spoil too quickly), participants indicated whether it was a common reason they didn't eat more servings of whole grains. Example reasons included: take too much time to prepare; my family doesn't like them; hard to find a variety of good ones.

  9 weeks

• Barriers to eating more fruits and vegetables and whole grains

  Change from baseline in barriers to eating more fruits and vegetables. We adapted items from an existing barriers instrument to measure perceived barriers to eating more fruits and vegetables (F\&V) (average score of 15 items; Cronbach's alpha = .89) and whole grains (average score of 14 items; Cronbach's alpha = .83). Participants were asked the general question, "Listed below are some common reasons why people don't eat more servings of vegetables and fruits each day. Indicate whether or not this is a reason for you by marking how much you agree or disagree." (1 = Strongly disagree; 5 = Strongly agree). In addition, using the same list of possible reasons (excluding spoil too quickly), participants indicated whether it was a common reason they didn't eat more servings of whole grains. Example reasons included: take too much time to prepare; my family doesn't like them; hard to find a variety of good ones.

  15 weeks

Study Arms (2)

CCK In-Person Sessions

EXPERIMENTAL

This group received the in-person CCK intervention.

Behavioral: CCK In-Person Sessions

CCK Printed Materials

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This group received select printed CCK materials.

Behavioral: CCK Printed Materials

Interventions

CCK In-Person Sessions BEHAVIORAL

This group attended eight weeks of nutrition education-focused experiential learning.

CCK In-Person Sessions

CCK Printed Materials BEHAVIORAL

This group did not attend any in-person sessions and was only provided with select CCK written materials.

CCK Printed Materials

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may not qualify if:

• Need to have ever been diagnosed with cancer to be eligible
• Need to have not participated in a Living Plate cooking program
• Need to be able to attend at least seven of the eight sessions of the series with mandatory first and last sessions
• Need to have completed active cancer treatment (not including hormonal or other similar agents, e.g., tamoxifen)

Sponsors & Collaborators

• American Institute for Cancer Research: lead

Study Sites (1)

Cancer Support Community Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, 90025, United States

Location

Related Links

• Related Info

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms

Study Officials

• Melissa Miller, PhD

  American Institute for Cancer Research

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: SUPPORTIVE CARE
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: August 17, 2020
• First Posted: August 27, 2020
• Study Start: April 30, 2019
• Primary Completion: August 12, 2019
• Study Completion: October 8, 2019
• Last Updated: August 27, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-08

Locations

US (1)