Apnoea-Hypopnoea-Indices Determined Via Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Those Determined by Polysomnography
Meta IAHflow
1 other identifier
observational
1
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To date, no published systematic review and meta-analysis has compared AHI-CPAPflow and AHI-PSGgold. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to compare published data for AHI-PSGgold and AHI-CPAPflow in patients treated by CPAP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Mar 2021
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 25, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 31, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2021
CompletedOctober 19, 2021
October 1, 2021
2 months
August 21, 2020
October 18, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The mean difference between AHI-CPAPflow and AHI-PSGgold
AHI-CPAPflow = Apnoea-Hypopnoea-Indices Determined Via Continuous Positive Airway Pressure AHI-PSGgold = Apnoea-Hypopnoea-Indices Determined by Polysomnography
Day 0
The standard deviation for the mean difference between AHI-CPAPflow and AHI-PSGgold
Day 0
Secondary Outcomes (8)
The mean difference between AI-CPAPflow and AI-PSGgold
Day 0
The standard deviation for the mean difference between AI-CPAPflow and AI-PSGgold
Day 0
The mean difference between HI-CPAPflow and HI-PSGgold
Day 0
The standard deviation for the mean difference between HI-CPAPflow and HI-PSGgold
Day 0
The mean difference between RDI-CPAPflow and RDI-PSGgold
Day 0
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
The study population
All (full scientific) study designs and publication types written in English and reporting Bland-Altman test results (or other tests suggesting the presence of the required data) between simultaneous, paired, polysomnography (PSG)-derived AND Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)-derived data describing sleep disordered breathing.
Interventions
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure device deployed for at least one night synchronously with polysomnography.
Polysomnography deployed for at least one night synchronously with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure.
Eligibility Criteria
Adult patients treated with a CPAP-device and synchronous polysomnography.
You may qualify if:
- All (full scientific) study designs and publication types written in English and reporting Bland-Altman test results (or other tests suggesting the presence of the required data) between simultaneous, paired, polysomnography (PSG)-derived AND Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)-derived data describing sleep disordered breathing.
You may not qualify if:
- Duplicates
- Does not refer to a full scientific article (e.g. case reports are excluded).
- Meta-analysis
- Paediatric populations (populations \<18 years are excluded).
- Absence of appropriate paired results: synchronized polysomnography (PSG)-derived AND Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)-derived data must be reported for ≥1 of the following measures: Apnoea-Hypopnoea-Indices (AHI), Apnoea-Indices (AI), Hypopnoea-Indices(HI), respiratory disturbance index (RDI), respiratory effort related arousals (RERA).
- Absence of appropriate test comparing paired results: the study must use ≥1 of the fol-lowing tests to compare the previously mentioned PSG-vs-CPAP-derived data: a bland-altman or correlation test, other conformity tests, tests of differences in centrality.
- Inappropriate PSG scoring 1: PSG-derived variables must be coded following the American Academy of Sleep Medicine 2007 (or more recent) guidelines.
- Inappropriate PSG scoring 2: PSG-derived variables must be scored manually.
- Inappropriate PSG scoring 3: oxygen desaturation level used for scoring must be mentioned and at 3% or 4%.
- Inappropriate CPAP description: brand/device names must be mentioned.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospitals of Montpellier
Montpellier, 34925, France
Related Publications (1)
Bertelli F, Suehs CM, Mallet JP, Rotty MC, Pepin JL, Gagnadoux F, Matzner-Lober E, Bourdin A, Molinari N, Jaffuel D. Apnoea-hypopnoea indices determined via continuous positive airway pressure (AHI-CPAPflow) versus those determined by polysomnography (AHI-PSGgold): a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2021 May 10;11(5):e044499. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044499.
PMID: 33972338BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Dany Jaffuel, MD,PhD
University Hospitals of Montpellier
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 21, 2020
First Posted
August 25, 2020
Study Start
March 31, 2021
Primary Completion
May 31, 2021
Study Completion
May 31, 2021
Last Updated
October 19, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share