NCT04526366

Brief Summary

To date, no published systematic review and meta-analysis has compared AHI-CPAPflow and AHI-PSGgold. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to compare published data for AHI-PSGgold and AHI-CPAPflow in patients treated by CPAP.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2021

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 21, 2020

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 25, 2020

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 31, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 31, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 31, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

October 19, 2021

Status Verified

October 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

August 21, 2020

Last Update Submit

October 18, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

apnoea hypopnoea indexCPAP

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • The mean difference between AHI-CPAPflow and AHI-PSGgold

    AHI-CPAPflow = Apnoea-Hypopnoea-Indices Determined Via Continuous Positive Airway Pressure AHI-PSGgold = Apnoea-Hypopnoea-Indices Determined by Polysomnography

    Day 0

  • The standard deviation for the mean difference between AHI-CPAPflow and AHI-PSGgold

    Day 0

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • The mean difference between AI-CPAPflow and AI-PSGgold

    Day 0

  • The standard deviation for the mean difference between AI-CPAPflow and AI-PSGgold

    Day 0

  • The mean difference between HI-CPAPflow and HI-PSGgold

    Day 0

  • The standard deviation for the mean difference between HI-CPAPflow and HI-PSGgold

    Day 0

  • The mean difference between RDI-CPAPflow and RDI-PSGgold

    Day 0

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

The study population

All (full scientific) study designs and publication types written in English and reporting Bland-Altman test results (or other tests suggesting the presence of the required data) between simultaneous, paired, polysomnography (PSG)-derived AND Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)-derived data describing sleep disordered breathing.

Device: Continuous Positive Airway PressureDevice: Polysomnography

Interventions

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure device deployed for at least one night synchronously with polysomnography.

The study population

Polysomnography deployed for at least one night synchronously with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure.

The study population

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Adult patients treated with a CPAP-device and synchronous polysomnography.

You may qualify if:

  • All (full scientific) study designs and publication types written in English and reporting Bland-Altman test results (or other tests suggesting the presence of the required data) between simultaneous, paired, polysomnography (PSG)-derived AND Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)-derived data describing sleep disordered breathing.

You may not qualify if:

  • Duplicates
  • Does not refer to a full scientific article (e.g. case reports are excluded).
  • Meta-analysis
  • Paediatric populations (populations \<18 years are excluded).
  • Absence of appropriate paired results: synchronized polysomnography (PSG)-derived AND Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)-derived data must be reported for ≥1 of the following measures: Apnoea-Hypopnoea-Indices (AHI), Apnoea-Indices (AI), Hypopnoea-Indices(HI), respiratory disturbance index (RDI), respiratory effort related arousals (RERA).
  • Absence of appropriate test comparing paired results: the study must use ≥1 of the fol-lowing tests to compare the previously mentioned PSG-vs-CPAP-derived data: a bland-altman or correlation test, other conformity tests, tests of differences in centrality.
  • Inappropriate PSG scoring 1: PSG-derived variables must be coded following the American Academy of Sleep Medicine 2007 (or more recent) guidelines.
  • Inappropriate PSG scoring 2: PSG-derived variables must be scored manually.
  • Inappropriate PSG scoring 3: oxygen desaturation level used for scoring must be mentioned and at 3% or 4%.
  • Inappropriate CPAP description: brand/device names must be mentioned.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospitals of Montpellier

Montpellier, 34925, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Bertelli F, Suehs CM, Mallet JP, Rotty MC, Pepin JL, Gagnadoux F, Matzner-Lober E, Bourdin A, Molinari N, Jaffuel D. Apnoea-hypopnoea indices determined via continuous positive airway pressure (AHI-CPAPflow) versus those determined by polysomnography (AHI-PSGgold): a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2021 May 10;11(5):e044499. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044499.

    PMID: 33972338BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sleep Apnea Syndromes

Interventions

Continuous Positive Airway PressurePolysomnography

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ApneaRespiration DisordersRespiratory Tract DiseasesSleep Disorders, IntrinsicDyssomniasSleep Wake DisordersNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Positive-Pressure RespirationRespiration, ArtificialAirway ManagementTherapeuticsRespiratory TherapyMonitoring, PhysiologicDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosis

Study Officials

  • Dany Jaffuel, MD,PhD

    University Hospitals of Montpellier

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
OTHER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2020

First Posted

August 25, 2020

Study Start

March 31, 2021

Primary Completion

May 31, 2021

Study Completion

May 31, 2021

Last Updated

October 19, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations