The ISEO Biofeedback Tool During the Rehabilitation of Patients Treated for Rotator Cuff Tear
PDT1-1
The Use of the Motion Analysis System ISEO, as a Biofeedback Tool During the Rehabilitation Process of Patients Surgically Treated for Rotator Cuff Tear
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present study addresses the issue about post-surgical recovery process, for patients arthroscopically treated for rotator-cuff tear. The aim of the research is to test the effectiveness of a new rehabilitation protocol that includes kinematic biofeedback with the motion analysis system ISEO.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 21, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 27, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 27, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 4, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 20, 2020
CompletedAugust 20, 2020
August 1, 2020
2.3 years
August 4, 2020
August 19, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
The Scapula-Weighted Constant-Murley Score (SW-CMS) at T3
The SW-CMS is a modified version of the CMS, based on the quality of the movement of the scapula: the score referred to humerus elevation is "weighted" based on scapula movement. The Score varies between 0 (worse) and 100 (best) points.
90 days after surgery
The Scapula-Weighted Constant-Murley Score (SW-CMS) at T5A
The SW-CMS is a modified version of the CMS, based on the quality of the movement of the scapula: the score referred to humerus elevation is "weighted" based on scapula movement. The Score varies between 0 (worse) and 100 (best) points.
6 months after surgery
The Scapula-Weighted Constant-Murley Score (SW-CMS) at T5B
The SW-CMS is a modified version of the CMS, based on the quality of the movement of the scapula: the score referred to humerus elevation is "weighted" based on scapula movement. The Score varies between 0 (worse) and 100 (best) points.
12 months after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Constant-Murley Score (CMS)
T0 (before surgery), T1 (45 days after surgery), T3 (90 days after surgery), T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).
American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)
T0 (before surgery), T1 (45 days after surgery), T3 (90 days after surgery), T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
T0 (before surgery), T1 (45 days after surgery), T3 (90 days after surgery), T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).
EuroQol five-dimension scale (EQ-5D)
T0 (before surgery), T1 (45 days after surgery), T3 (90 days after surgery), T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).
Superficial Electromyography (sEMG)
T0 (before surgery), T1 (45 days after surgery), T3 (90 days after surgery), T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Percent of job-change
T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).
Degree of satisfaction of the patient: score
T0 (before surgery), T1 (45 days after surgery), T3 (90 days after surgery), T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).
Study Arms (2)
Biofeedback
EXPERIMENTALPatients were treated with an experimental rehabilitation protocol, based on shoulder kinematic biofeedback.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONPatients were treated with a standard rehabilitation protocol, based on hospital guidelines.
Interventions
Exercises are performed with the help of the ISEO motion analysis system, that provides a real-time biofeedback of shoulder kinematics. All exercises are administered by the Physical Therapist.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with rotator cuff injuries;
- asymptomatic contralateral shoulder, that can be considered as a reference for the differential evaluation;
- indication for arthroscopy;
- employees;
- rehabilitation executed at AUSL-Romagna.
You may not qualify if:
- irreparable injuries of the rotator cuff;
- contralateral painful shoulder;
- patients being treated for cancer in the last 6 months;
- patients with concomitant neurological pathologies;
- patients with spinal cord injuries;
- patients with cuff lesions with infectious processes;
- patients with severe scoliosis;
- patients with recurrent lesions of the cuff;
- patients with occupational diseases or work-related accidents;
- patients for whom the return to work cannot be reliably established.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
AUSL della Romagna - Cervesi Hospital
Cattolica, Rimini, 47841, Italy
Related Publications (4)
Parel I, Jaspers E, DE Baets L, Amoresano A, Cutti AG. Motion analysis of the shoulder in adults: kinematics and electromyography for the clinical practice. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Aug;52(4):575-82. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
PMID: 27434612BACKGROUNDCutti AG, Parel I, Pellegrini A, Paladini P, Sacchetti R, Porcellini G, Merolla G. The Constant score and the assessment of scapula dyskinesis: Proposal and assessment of an integrated outcome measure. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2016 Aug;29:81-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
PMID: 26184668BACKGROUNDCutti AG, Parel I, Raggi M, Petracci E, Pellegrini A, Accardo AP, Sacchetti R, Porcellini G. Prediction bands and intervals for the scapulo-humeral coordination based on the Bootstrap and two Gaussian methods. J Biomech. 2014 Mar 21;47(5):1035-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.028. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
PMID: 24485513BACKGROUNDConstant CR, Gerber C, Emery RJ, Sojbjerg JO, Gohlke F, Boileau P. A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;17(2):355-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.022. Epub 2008 Jan 22. No abstract available.
PMID: 18218327BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maria V Filippi, MD
AUSL della Romagna
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Paolo Paladini, MD
AUSL della Romagna
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Riccardo Galassi, MD
AUSL della Romagna
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2020
First Posted
August 20, 2020
Study Start
November 21, 2017
Primary Completion
February 27, 2020
Study Completion
February 27, 2020
Last Updated
August 20, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share