NCT04521504

Brief Summary

The present study addresses the issue about post-surgical recovery process, for patients arthroscopically treated for rotator-cuff tear. The aim of the research is to test the effectiveness of a new rehabilitation protocol that includes kinematic biofeedback with the motion analysis system ISEO.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
46

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 21, 2017

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 27, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 27, 2020

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 4, 2020

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 20, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

August 20, 2020

Status Verified

August 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

August 4, 2020

Last Update Submit

August 19, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

ShoulderBiofeedbackKinematics

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • The Scapula-Weighted Constant-Murley Score (SW-CMS) at T3

    The SW-CMS is a modified version of the CMS, based on the quality of the movement of the scapula: the score referred to humerus elevation is "weighted" based on scapula movement. The Score varies between 0 (worse) and 100 (best) points.

    90 days after surgery

  • The Scapula-Weighted Constant-Murley Score (SW-CMS) at T5A

    The SW-CMS is a modified version of the CMS, based on the quality of the movement of the scapula: the score referred to humerus elevation is "weighted" based on scapula movement. The Score varies between 0 (worse) and 100 (best) points.

    6 months after surgery

  • The Scapula-Weighted Constant-Murley Score (SW-CMS) at T5B

    The SW-CMS is a modified version of the CMS, based on the quality of the movement of the scapula: the score referred to humerus elevation is "weighted" based on scapula movement. The Score varies between 0 (worse) and 100 (best) points.

    12 months after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Constant-Murley Score (CMS)

    T0 (before surgery), T1 (45 days after surgery), T3 (90 days after surgery), T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)

    T0 (before surgery), T1 (45 days after surgery), T3 (90 days after surgery), T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).

  • Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

    T0 (before surgery), T1 (45 days after surgery), T3 (90 days after surgery), T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).

  • EuroQol five-dimension scale (EQ-5D)

    T0 (before surgery), T1 (45 days after surgery), T3 (90 days after surgery), T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).

  • Superficial Electromyography (sEMG)

    T0 (before surgery), T1 (45 days after surgery), T3 (90 days after surgery), T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Percent of job-change

    T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).

  • Degree of satisfaction of the patient: score

    T0 (before surgery), T1 (45 days after surgery), T3 (90 days after surgery), T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).

Study Arms (2)

Biofeedback

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients were treated with an experimental rehabilitation protocol, based on shoulder kinematic biofeedback.

Device: Kinematic biofeedback with ISEO motion analysis system

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Patients were treated with a standard rehabilitation protocol, based on hospital guidelines.

Interventions

Exercises are performed with the help of the ISEO motion analysis system, that provides a real-time biofeedback of shoulder kinematics. All exercises are administered by the Physical Therapist.

Biofeedback

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients with rotator cuff injuries;
  • asymptomatic contralateral shoulder, that can be considered as a reference for the differential evaluation;
  • indication for arthroscopy;
  • employees;
  • rehabilitation executed at AUSL-Romagna.

You may not qualify if:

  • irreparable injuries of the rotator cuff;
  • contralateral painful shoulder;
  • patients being treated for cancer in the last 6 months;
  • patients with concomitant neurological pathologies;
  • patients with spinal cord injuries;
  • patients with cuff lesions with infectious processes;
  • patients with severe scoliosis;
  • patients with recurrent lesions of the cuff;
  • patients with occupational diseases or work-related accidents;
  • patients for whom the return to work cannot be reliably established.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

AUSL della Romagna - Cervesi Hospital

Cattolica, Rimini, 47841, Italy

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Parel I, Jaspers E, DE Baets L, Amoresano A, Cutti AG. Motion analysis of the shoulder in adults: kinematics and electromyography for the clinical practice. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Aug;52(4):575-82. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

    PMID: 27434612BACKGROUND
  • Cutti AG, Parel I, Pellegrini A, Paladini P, Sacchetti R, Porcellini G, Merolla G. The Constant score and the assessment of scapula dyskinesis: Proposal and assessment of an integrated outcome measure. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2016 Aug;29:81-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 6.

    PMID: 26184668BACKGROUND
  • Cutti AG, Parel I, Raggi M, Petracci E, Pellegrini A, Accardo AP, Sacchetti R, Porcellini G. Prediction bands and intervals for the scapulo-humeral coordination based on the Bootstrap and two Gaussian methods. J Biomech. 2014 Mar 21;47(5):1035-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.028. Epub 2014 Jan 13.

    PMID: 24485513BACKGROUND
  • Constant CR, Gerber C, Emery RJ, Sojbjerg JO, Gohlke F, Boileau P. A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;17(2):355-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.022. Epub 2008 Jan 22. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18218327BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RuptureWounds and InjuriesShoulder InjuriesTendon Injuries

Study Officials

  • Maria V Filippi, MD

    AUSL della Romagna

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Paolo Paladini, MD

    AUSL della Romagna

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Riccardo Galassi, MD

    AUSL della Romagna

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study considers participants divided in two groups: the control group and the experimental group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2020

First Posted

August 20, 2020

Study Start

November 21, 2017

Primary Completion

February 27, 2020

Study Completion

February 27, 2020

Last Updated

August 20, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations