Modifications of Devices for Hip Arthroscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
111
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This is protocol is intended to demonstrate the principal investigator's improvements and modifications of a hip capsule side fixed slotted cannula for continued access to the hip joint and a bone graft delivery tool set for grafting subchrondral cysts during hip arthroscopy procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 18, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 24, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2026
ExpectedFebruary 8, 2023
February 1, 2023
3.9 years
July 8, 2020
February 6, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Surgical time per technical phase measured in minutes
* We aim to demonstrate that the use of the modified device for hip arthroscopy is fast and efficient as measured by surgical time per technical phase (i.e. arthroscopic labral repair phase and arthroscopic bone grafting phase). * Arthroscopic Labral Repair Phase: During hip arthoscopy, the surgical time of the arthroscopic labral repair phase will be collected. * Arthroscopic Bone Grafting Phase: During hip arthoscopy, the surgical time of the bone grafting of the hip joint phase will be collected. * In this design, the technical phase recorded will either be: 1) duration of arthroscopic labral repair phase (in patients only undergoing arthroscopic labral repair) or 2) duration of arthroscopic bone grafting phase (in patients undergoing arthroscopic bone grafting).
1 Day
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Rate of Surgical Complications
Up to 24 months
Surgical costs per device used
1 Day
Patient Outcomes: Post-operative Pain
Post operative up to Day 9
Patient Outcomes: Change in Pain
Pre-treatment, Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
Patient Outcomes: Change in International Hip Outcome Tool (IHOT-12) Scores
Pre-treatment, Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arthrosocpic labral repair
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients undergoing arthroscopic labral repair with the use of the modified hip capsule slotted cannula.
Arthroscopic bone grafting
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients undergoing arthroscopic bone grafting of subchrondral cyst with the use of the modified bone graft delivery tool set and modified hip capsule slotted cannula.
Interventions
Modified hip capsule side fixed slotted cannula used during surgery to allow for continued access to the hip joint.
Modified bone graft delivery tool set for grafting subchrondral cysts arthroscopically during hip arthroscopy procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males or females between the ages of 18 and 60 years diagnosed with FAI, Hip Dysplasia or the combination of the two.
- Persistent hip pain accompanied by mechanical symptoms refractory to nonoperative management lasting at least 3 months.
- Reproducible clinical examination findings suggestive of impingement and/or decreased range of motion, and positive radiographic findings on radiography, computed tomography with 3-dimensional reconstruction, and magnetic resonance imaging.
- Joint-space width \> 3 mm on all views of plain radiography and 3-dimensional computed tomography.
- Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for the treatment of FAI, Hip Dysplasia, or the combination of the two by the Principal Invesitgator.
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<18 years.
- Prisoners.
- Pregnant women.
- Decisionally challenged.
- Does not speak or understand English.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
University of Colorado, Hip Preservation Center, Orthopedic Department
Boulder, Colorado, 80304, United States
UCHealth Steadman Hawkins Clinic - Denver
Englewood, Colorado, 80112, United States
Related Publications (11)
Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Jul;87(7):1012-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B7.15203.
PMID: 15972923BACKGROUNDZhang C, Li L, Forster BB, Kopec JA, Ratzlaff C, Halai L, Cibere J, Esdaile JM. Femoroacetabular impingement and osteoarthritis of the hip. Can Fam Physician. 2015 Dec;61(12):1055-60.
PMID: 26668284BACKGROUNDLung R, O'Brien J, Grebenyuk J, Forster BB, De Vera M, Kopec J, Ratzlaff C, Garbuz D, Prlic H, Esdaile JM. The prevalence of radiographic femoroacetabular impingement in younger individuals undergoing total hip replacement for osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Aug;31(8):1239-42. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-1981-9. Epub 2012 May 3.
PMID: 22552857BACKGROUNDHuo MH, Parvizi J, Bal BS, Mont MA; Council of Musculoskeletal Specialty Societies (COMSS) of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. What's new in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep;90(9):2043-55. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00741. No abstract available.
PMID: 18762667BACKGROUNDKelly BT, Williams RJ 3rd, Philippon MJ. Hip arthroscopy: current indications, treatment options, and management issues. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Nov-Dec;31(6):1020-37. doi: 10.1177/03635465030310060701.
PMID: 14623676BACKGROUNDPhilippon MJ, Stubbs AJ, Schenker ML, Maxwell RB, Ganz R, Leunig M. Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: osteoplasty technique and literature review. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Sep;35(9):1571-80. doi: 10.1177/0363546507300258. Epub 2007 Apr 9.
PMID: 17420508BACKGROUNDHuo MH, Parvizi J, Bal BS, Mont MA. What's new in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Oct;91(10):2522-34. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00801. No abstract available.
PMID: 19797590BACKGROUNDLeunig M, Werlen S, Ungersbock A, Ito K, Ganz R. Evaluation of the acetabular labrum by MR arthrography. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Mar;79(2):230-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b2.7288.
PMID: 9119848BACKGROUNDTsai SW, Chen CF, Wu PK, Chen TH, Liu CL, Chen WM. Modified anterolateral approach in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2015 May-Jun;25(3):245-50. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000218. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
PMID: 25684250BACKGROUNDWang Y, Xu H, Ding M, Zhen Z, Lu Q, Liao B, Shangguan L. Permanently Avoiding Steam on Camera for Arthroscopy by a Simple Device. Arthrosc Tech. 2018 Dec 17;8(1):e47-e49. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2018.08.029. eCollection 2019 Jan.
PMID: 30899650BACKGROUNDRStudio: Integrated Development for R. [computer program]. Version 1.1.456. Boston, MA: RStudio, Inc.; 2016
BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Omer Mei-Dan, MD
University of Colorado, Denver
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- We will be utilizing anonymous staff surveys. After the staff within the operating room (scrub, circulator, PA, and fellow) completes the paper survey (following the procedure), the staff member (who did not use the device per specific surgery) will administer the survey and seal in an envelope, which will be sent to the PRA. Thus, these responses will be blinded to the PI.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2020
First Posted
August 18, 2020
Study Start
August 24, 2020
Primary Completion
August 1, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Last Updated
February 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share