NCT04512690

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to verify whether electrical stimulation of the cervical spinal cord can activate muscles of the arm and hand in people with hemiplegia following stroke. Participants will undergo a surgical procedure to implant a system which provides epidural electrical stimulation (EES) of the cervical spinal cord. Researchers will quantify the ability of EES to recruit arm and hand muscles and produce distinct kinematic movements. The implant will be removed after less than 30 days. Results of this study will provide the foundation for future studies evaluating the efficacy of a minimally-invasive neuro-technology that can be used in clinical neurorehabilitation programs to restore upper limb motor function in people with subcortical strokes, thereby increasing independence and quality of life.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
7

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 24, 2020

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 13, 2020

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 24, 2021

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 11, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.3 years

First QC Date

July 24, 2020

Last Update Submit

August 5, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Adverse Events

    Study is considered successful if no serious adverse events related to the use of electrical stimulation are reported

    29 days

  • Discomfort and Pain

    We will assess the relative level of discomfort and/or pain that is associated to the delivery of stimulation to the spinal cord. After each stimulation trains patients will be asked to report their perceived discomfort level using a 10 value subjective scale. Low values will be assigned to low discomfort, and high values to high discomfort.The study is considered successful if 70% of recruited subjects does not report discomfort or pain at stimulation amplitudes that are required to obtain motor responses in the muscles of the arm and hand

    7, 14, 21, 29 days

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Motor Impairment

    15, 29 days

  • Dexterity / Function: Action Research Arm Test

    7, 29 days

  • Single Joint Force

    7, 14, 21, 29 days

  • Joint Velocity

    7, 14, 21, 29 days

  • Movement Smoothness

    7, 14, 21, 29 days

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Epidural electrical stimulation of the cervical spinal cord

EXPERIMENTAL

Individuals with prior subcortical stroke and hemiparesis of the upper extremity.

Device: Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) of the cervical spinal cord

Interventions

All participants enrolled in this group will undergo a surgical procedure to implant a system which provides epidural electrical stimulation (EES) of the cervical spinal cord. Researchers will quantify the ability of EES to recruit arm and hand muscles and produce distinct kinematic movements. The implant will be removed after less than 30 days.

Epidural electrical stimulation of the cervical spinal cord

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants must be between the ages of 21 and 70 years old.
  • Scores higher than 7 and lower than 50 on the Fugl-Meyer scale

You may not qualify if:

  • Serious disease or disorder (ex. neurological condition other than stroke, cancer, severe cardiac or respiratory disease, renal failure, etc.) or cognitive impairments that could affect the ability to participate in study activities.
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding.
  • Receiving anticoagulant, anti-spasticity or anti-epileptic medications throughout the duration of the study.
  • Presence of any implanted medical devices.
  • Severe claustrophobia.
  • Presence of joint contractures deemed by study clinician/investigator to be too severe to participate in study activities
  • Results from the Brief Symptoms Inventory (BSI-18) and additional discussions with the Principal Investigator and a study physician that deem participant inappropriate for the study.
  • Evaluation to sign consent form score \<12.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Capogrosso M, Milekovic T, Borton D, Wagner F, Moraud EM, Mignardot JB, Buse N, Gandar J, Barraud Q, Xing D, Rey E, Duis S, Jianzhong Y, Ko WK, Li Q, Detemple P, Denison T, Micera S, Bezard E, Bloch J, Courtine G. A brain-spine interface alleviating gait deficits after spinal cord injury in primates. Nature. 2016 Nov 10;539(7628):284-288. doi: 10.1038/nature20118.

    PMID: 27830790BACKGROUND
  • Coscia M, Wessel MJ, Chaudary U, Millan JDR, Micera S, Guggisberg A, Vuadens P, Donoghue J, Birbaumer N, Hummel FC. Neurotechnology-aided interventions for upper limb motor rehabilitation in severe chronic stroke. Brain. 2019 Aug 1;142(8):2182-2197. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz181.

    PMID: 31257411BACKGROUND
  • Angeli CA, Edgerton VR, Gerasimenko YP, Harkema SJ. Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans. Brain. 2014 May;137(Pt 5):1394-409. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu038. Epub 2014 Apr 8.

    PMID: 24713270BACKGROUND
  • Capogrosso M, Wenger N, Raspopovic S, Musienko P, Beauparlant J, Bassi Luciani L, Courtine G, Micera S. A computational model for epidural electrical stimulation of spinal sensorimotor circuits. J Neurosci. 2013 Dec 4;33(49):19326-40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1688-13.2013.

    PMID: 24305828BACKGROUND
  • Lu DC, Edgerton VR, Modaber M, AuYong N, Morikawa E, Zdunowski S, Sarino ME, Sarrafzadeh M, Nuwer MR, Roy RR, Gerasimenko Y. Engaging Cervical Spinal Cord Networks to Reenable Volitional Control of Hand Function in Tetraplegic Patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Nov;30(10):951-962. doi: 10.1177/1545968316644344. Epub 2016 May 18.

    PMID: 27198185BACKGROUND
  • Barra B, Roux C, Kaeser M, Schiavone G, Lacour SP, Bloch J, Courtine G, Rouiller EM, Schmidlin E, Capogrosso M. Selective Recruitment of Arm Motoneurons in Nonhuman Primates Using Epidural Electrical Stimulation of the Cervical Spinal Cord. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:1424-1427. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512554.

    PMID: 30440659BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersVascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Lee Fisher, PhD

    University of Pittsburgh

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Prospective, non-randomized, open-label, descriptive, experimental
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2020

First Posted

August 13, 2020

Study Start

March 24, 2021

Primary Completion

June 30, 2025

Study Completion

June 30, 2025

Last Updated

August 11, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Data may be shared with other researchers for the purpose of data analysis and collaboration.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE

Locations