The Thrust Technique of Tibiotarsal Joint on the Symptomatology of Pain at Classical Ballet Dancers
The Effect of the Thrust Technique of Tibiotarsal Joint on the Symptomatology of Pain at Classical Ballet Dancers
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Classical ballet is a type of high performance dance that requires great effort and extreme joint positions by its dancers, not to mention a precise control of the ankle joint when on pointe position. Ballet dancers excessively dorsiflex, and especially plantar flex the ankle, which predisposes anterior displacement of the talus, possibly causing mobility restrictions of the tibiotarsal articulation and making it difficult and painful to move the ankle while dancing. The Thrust technique of tibiotarsal joint is a manipulation that aim to improve mobility and articular function through a high-speed and short-range movement. The purpose of the study is to verify the effect of the Thrust technique of tibiotarsal joint on the pain symptomatology in classical ballet dancers. Ballerinas included in the study presented pain in the ankle when dancing classical ballet, tenderness to palpation in the anterior and posterior tibiotarsal articulation, and dysfunction after compression of the tibiotarsal articulation. The sample consisted of 20 ballerinas, out of which 10 were subjected to manipulation (IG) and 10 formed the control group (CG). Algic symptomatology in classical ballet dance was assessed after some practice with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). After that, an algometer was used to quantify the threshold of pain in the anterior and posterior ankle joint that presented restrictions in mobility. The Tug technique was performed in the tibiotarsal articulation in the IG, and in the CG it was simulated. The threshold of pain in the anterior and posterior tibiotalar joint was measured again immediately after the intervention or simulation. The ballerinas were reassessed using algometry and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) one week after the manipulation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable pain
Started Jun 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 10, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 8, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 13, 2020
CompletedAugust 13, 2020
August 1, 2020
4 months
August 8, 2020
August 11, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analog Scale
A scale that quantifies the intensity of pain through punctuated values, at one extreme of 0, indicating "no pain", to 10, pointing an "maximum pain"
One week
Study Arms (2)
Intervention Group (IG)
EXPERIMENTALThe GI dancers, submitted to tibiotarsal thrust manipulation
Control Group (CG)
SHAM COMPARATORFor the CG was performed the simulation of the technique, with the participants and the osteopath positioned in the same way as the IG, however there was no reproduction of joint noise.
Interventions
The dancers were positioned in dorsal decubitus position with the heel outside the stretcher. The osteopath positioned in a lateral feint, inflected knees and forearms in the same plane as the participant's leg. With the internal hand slipped the pinky finger on the medial edge of the foot to the talus neck, the other fingers on the dorsum of the foot and the thumbs controlling the first metatarsus. The position of the talus in relation to the tibia was corrected, initially by placing the foot in eversion and then in dorsal flexion. The osteopath left the body weight behind, causing a traction in the joint. The thrust consisted of a impulse of high speed and low amplitude impulse in a caudal direction, closing the elbows20. The technique was performed until the obtainment (achieved) the joint noise only in the restricted foot, and only one service was performed. After one week, a reassessment of the painful sensation after the dance was performed.
Simulation of the technique Tibiotarsal Thrust Manipulation, with the participants and the osteopath positioned in the same way as the IG, however there was no reproduction of joint noise.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Classical ballet dancers with a minimum period of 02 years of practice and who presented pain complaints in the ankle during ballet training, pain at palpation in the anterior and posterior tibiotalar joint of the ankle and dysfunction in compression of the tibiotarsal joint.
You may not qualify if:
- Classical ballet dancers with joint hypermobility, painful symptomatology without tibiotarsal compression of the dysfunction and participants who suffered some injury during the survey period.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Laiana Sepúlveda de Andrade Mesquita
Teresina, Piauí, 64052-580, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Responsible Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 8, 2020
First Posted
August 13, 2020
Study Start
June 10, 2017
Primary Completion
October 1, 2017
Study Completion
October 1, 2017
Last Updated
August 13, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share