NCT04512651

Brief Summary

Classical ballet is a type of high performance dance that requires great effort and extreme joint positions by its dancers, not to mention a precise control of the ankle joint when on pointe position. Ballet dancers excessively dorsiflex, and especially plantar flex the ankle, which predisposes anterior displacement of the talus, possibly causing mobility restrictions of the tibiotarsal articulation and making it difficult and painful to move the ankle while dancing. The Thrust technique of tibiotarsal joint is a manipulation that aim to improve mobility and articular function through a high-speed and short-range movement. The purpose of the study is to verify the effect of the Thrust technique of tibiotarsal joint on the pain symptomatology in classical ballet dancers. Ballerinas included in the study presented pain in the ankle when dancing classical ballet, tenderness to palpation in the anterior and posterior tibiotarsal articulation, and dysfunction after compression of the tibiotarsal articulation. The sample consisted of 20 ballerinas, out of which 10 were subjected to manipulation (IG) and 10 formed the control group (CG). Algic symptomatology in classical ballet dance was assessed after some practice with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). After that, an algometer was used to quantify the threshold of pain in the anterior and posterior ankle joint that presented restrictions in mobility. The Tug technique was performed in the tibiotarsal articulation in the IG, and in the CG it was simulated. The threshold of pain in the anterior and posterior tibiotalar joint was measured again immediately after the intervention or simulation. The ballerinas were reassessed using algometry and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) one week after the manipulation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 10, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2017

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 8, 2020

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 13, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

August 13, 2020

Status Verified

August 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

August 8, 2020

Last Update Submit

August 11, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

OsteopathyThrustClassical BalletPain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual Analog Scale

    A scale that quantifies the intensity of pain through punctuated values, at one extreme of 0, indicating "no pain", to 10, pointing an "maximum pain"

    One week

Study Arms (2)

Intervention Group (IG)

EXPERIMENTAL

The GI dancers, submitted to tibiotarsal thrust manipulation

Other: Tibiotarsal Thrust Manipulation

Control Group (CG)

SHAM COMPARATOR

For the CG was performed the simulation of the technique, with the participants and the osteopath positioned in the same way as the IG, however there was no reproduction of joint noise.

Other: Simulation Tibiotarsal Thrust Manipulation

Interventions

The dancers were positioned in dorsal decubitus position with the heel outside the stretcher. The osteopath positioned in a lateral feint, inflected knees and forearms in the same plane as the participant's leg. With the internal hand slipped the pinky finger on the medial edge of the foot to the talus neck, the other fingers on the dorsum of the foot and the thumbs controlling the first metatarsus. The position of the talus in relation to the tibia was corrected, initially by placing the foot in eversion and then in dorsal flexion. The osteopath left the body weight behind, causing a traction in the joint. The thrust consisted of a impulse of high speed and low amplitude impulse in a caudal direction, closing the elbows20. The technique was performed until the obtainment (achieved) the joint noise only in the restricted foot, and only one service was performed. After one week, a reassessment of the painful sensation after the dance was performed.

Intervention Group (IG)

Simulation of the technique Tibiotarsal Thrust Manipulation, with the participants and the osteopath positioned in the same way as the IG, however there was no reproduction of joint noise.

Control Group (CG)

Eligibility Criteria

Age15 Years - 15 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Classical ballet dancers with a minimum period of 02 years of practice and who presented pain complaints in the ankle during ballet training, pain at palpation in the anterior and posterior tibiotalar joint of the ankle and dysfunction in compression of the tibiotarsal joint.

You may not qualify if:

  • Classical ballet dancers with joint hypermobility, painful symptomatology without tibiotarsal compression of the dysfunction and participants who suffered some injury during the survey period.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Laiana Sepúlveda de Andrade Mesquita

Teresina, Piauí, 64052-580, Brazil

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainBone DiseasesAnkle Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMusculoskeletal DiseasesLeg InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a randomized clinical trial of quantitative character.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Responsible Researcher

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2020

First Posted

August 13, 2020

Study Start

June 10, 2017

Primary Completion

October 1, 2017

Study Completion

October 1, 2017

Last Updated

August 13, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations