Study Stopped
Recruitment too slow. Unrealistic to finish study with full inclusion cohort.
His-pacing and AV-node Ablation vs. Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation
His-PAAF
Physiological Pacemaker Treatment in Combination With AV Node Ablation Compared With Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation - a Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Objective To investigate if conduction system pacing ((CSP) i.e. atrioventricular node ablation + His bundle pacing or Left Bundle Branch pacing) is as good as (or better than) atrial fibrillation ablation with pulmonary vein isolation for older patients (70-85yrs) with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and at least moderately dilated left atrium. Patient population: 90 patients aged 70-85 years with atrial fibrillation, referred to either AV node ablation or pulmonary vein isolation. Primary endpoint: Improvement in health-related quality of life as measured by the physical component summary (PCS) of the well-validated SF-36 form, at one year after AV node ablation + CSP or AF ablation. Secondary endpoints: Physical performance measured by 6-minute walk test, biochemical markers of heart failure (NT-ProBNP), frequency of complications, left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, and left atrial size evaluated after 12 months. Arrhythmia specific symptoms and anxiety will be measured with the ASTA and HADS questionnaires. Arrhythmia symptom correlation between subjective and objective findings. After three years, clinical endpoints will be evaluated regarding overall survival, and risk of heart failure hospitalization or death. The cost of the treatments will be compared, and estimated cost per quality adjusted year of life will be calculated, based on the EQ5D questionnaire.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
Started Sep 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 13, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 26, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 26, 2025
CompletedMarch 4, 2025
February 1, 2024
4.5 years
July 1, 2020
February 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Health related Quality of Life: questionnaire
Improvement in the Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the SF-36 questionnaire
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Safety endpoint: Proportion of patients with major adverse events
12 months
Mental Quality of Life: questionnaire
12 months
Arrhythmia related Quality of Life: ASTA questionnaire
12 months
Anxiety and depression
12 months
Ejection fraction
12 months
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Conduction System pacing plus AV node ablation
EXPERIMENTALA His-pacing lead in combination with a backup RV pacing lead or an LBB pacing lead, and a right atrial lead (if needed) will be placed using standard technique. The His-pacing or LBB pacing lead will be Medtronic 3830, and the outer sheath will be either Medtronic C304 or C315 deflectable. If failure to implant with these tools, other leads and sheaths can be used at the discretion of the operator. A standard DDD pacemaker or CRT-P device from Medtronic will be used. A minimum of three weeks post-implant, the device will be interrogated and His-bundle threshold will be evaluated. A threshold of ≤2.0V@1.0ms is acceptable. If the device is well-functioning and successful His-pacing is documented, AV node ablation will be performed.
Pulmonary vein isolation
ACTIVE COMPARATORAtrial fibrillation will be performed as a complete pulmonary vein isolation. Either Cryoballon or radio frequency ablation with irrigated tip contact force enabled catheter can be used. Pulsed field ablation can be used if available. Endpoint is complete electrical isolation of all pulmonary veins, verified by entry- and exit block using a multipolar catheter during pacing.
Interventions
See study arm description.
See study arm description
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Indication for invasive treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation according to current guidelines
- LVEF \>35%
- Age 70-85 years
- Persistent atrial fibrillation, or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with at least moderate enlargement of the left atrium (≥42ml/m2)
- Chronic and well-tolerated treatment with anticoagulants (either non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist)
- Willingness to participate, to understand the instructions and fill out the questionnaires, and ability to sign informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Chronic atrial fibrillation with \>1 year duration
- BMI \>40kg/m2
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- Severe heart failure with symptoms ≥ NYHA class IIIb
- Heart amyloidosis
- Cardiac sarcoidosis
- Recent (\<3 months) myocardial infarction
- Significant heart valve disease (pronounced insufficiency or stenosis)
- Pacemaker or ICD treatment ongoing, or current pacemaker indication
- Congenital heart disease that required surgical correction
- Comorbidity that is assessed significantly affect the patient's quality of life over the next year, or 3-year survival
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Region Skanelead
Study Sites (4)
Linköping University
Linköping, Sweden
Skane University Hospital
Lund, 221 85, Sweden
Stockholm Arrhythmia Center
Stockholm, Sweden
Varberg Hospital
Varberg, Sweden
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rasmus Borgquist, MD PhD
Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Arrhythmia Section, Lund, Sweden
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 1, 2020
First Posted
August 13, 2020
Study Start
September 1, 2020
Primary Completion
February 26, 2025
Study Completion
February 26, 2025
Last Updated
March 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share