[177Lu]Ludotadipep Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study aims to evaluate the stability and efficacy after administration of \[177Lu\]Ludotadipep in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), with dose-escalation applied to determine the appropriate dose.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Oct 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 7, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 12, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 14, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2022
CompletedOctober 20, 2022
October 1, 2022
1.7 years
July 7, 2020
October 19, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Dose-limiting toxicity
Dose-limiting toxicity is defined as CTCAE grade 4 thrombocytopenia (platelet count \<25x109/L), grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \< 0.5 x 109), grade 3 febrile neutropenia (ANC \<1000/mm3 and temperature \>38.3℃ on at least 1 occasion or temperature ≥38℃ persisting for 1 hr), and other grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicity resulting from \[177Lu\]Ludotadipep, persisting for 5 days or more.
From date of randomization (IP administration (0h, visit3, Day 0 ~ 3)) until the date of grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3 febrile neutropenia, other grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicity resulting from [177Lu]Ludotadipep, persisting for 5 days or more.
Secondary Outcomes (13)
PSA level assessment
screening(Day -31 ~ -20), , visit4 (Day10), visit5 (Day17), visit6(Day24), visit7(Day31), visit8(Day45), visit9(Day59), visit10 (Day87)
Radiological assessment
2nd screeing(Day -19 ~ -1 ), visit7(Day31), visit9(Day59)
Biodistribution
2 hours, 24 hours (1 day), 48 hours (2 days), 72 hours (3 days) at visit3 (Day 0~3), visit 4(Day10)
Whole-body absorbed dose
2 hours, 24 hours (1 day), 48 hours (2 days), 72 hours (3 days) at visit3(Day 0~3)
Safety assessment by baseline symptoms
Screening(Day -31 ~ -20), 2nd screening(Day -19 ~ -1)
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (5)
50mCi
EXPERIMENTALUsing a drug product for which dose is determined (50±5 mCi dose), dilute with 0.9% NaCl 5 mL and slowly i.v. inject over 10 minutes, with 500 mL of 0.9% NaCl slowly administered for hydration over approximately 90 minutes from 30 minutes before treatment to 60 minutes after treatment.
75mCi
EXPERIMENTALUsing a drug product for which dose is determined (75±8 mCi dose), dilute with 0.9% NaCl 5 mL and slowly i.v. inject over 10 minutes, with 500 mL of 0.9% NaCl slowly administered for hydration over approximately 90 minutes from 30 minutes before treatment to 60 minutes after treatment.
100mCi
EXPERIMENTALUsing a drug product for which dose is determined (100±10 mCi dose), dilute with 0.9% NaCl 5 mL and slowly i.v. inject over 10 minutes, with 500 mL of 0.9% NaCl slowly administered for hydration over approximately 90 minutes from 30 minutes before treatment to 60 minutes after treatment.
125mCi
EXPERIMENTALUsing a drug product for which dose is determined (125±13 mCi dose), dilute with 0.9% NaCl 5 mL and slowly i.v. inject over 10 minutes, with 500 mL of 0.9% NaCl slowly administered for hydration over approximately 90 minutes from 30 minutes before treatment to 60 minutes after treatment.
150mCi
EXPERIMENTALUsing a drug product for which dose is determined (150±15 mCi dose), dilute with 0.9% NaCl 5 mL and slowly i.v. inject over 10 minutes, with 500 mL of 0.9% NaCl slowly administered for hydration over approximately 90 minutes from 30 minutes before treatment to 60 minutes after treatment.
Interventions
Dose is sequentially elevated starting from a low dose to a high dose (50±5 mCi, 75±8 mCi, 100±10 mCi, 125±13 mCi, 150±15 mCi). If DLT is observed in 2 or less of 6 subjects at each level, advance to the next step. If DLT is observed in 3 or more participants, no further subject will participate in the study at the relevant dose. Appropriateness of the dose elevation is evaluated 8-9 weeks after drug administration.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Among prostate cancer patients with blood testosterone ≤50ng/dL, mCRPC patients showing radiological progression after standard taxene-based anticancer treatment and 2nd generation hormone agent (abiraterone, enzalutamed, or both)) treatment or patients who are not eligible for such standard medical treatment at the discretion of an investigator or patients who refuse such standard treatment
- Patients who are positive on the \[18F\]PSMA PET/CT imaging
- Subjects who were fully informed by an investigator of the study objectives, details, and characteristics of the study drug prior to study enrollment, and had an informed consent form signed by the subject or caretaker or legally acceptable representative
- Male patients aged 20 years or older
- Subjects who are sexually active and have a female partner of childbearing potential should meet the followings
- Subjects should consent to practice contraception by continuously using a male condom from screening, throughout the study, and for at least 6 months after the last dose of the study drug
- Subjects should never donate sperms from screening, throughout the study, and for at least 6 months after the last dose of the study drug
- Subjects with a partner who is a woman of childbearing potential (including a pregnant or breastfeeding mother) should consent to maintain sexual abstinence or practice double contraception throughout the study \* Double contraception: Corresponding to 2 or more of the followings - use of a condom, use of a non-hormonal intrauterine device, use of a diaphragm, use of a cervical cap, a sexual partner who has been vasectomized at least 3 months (as of the first screening visit) or a sexual partner medically diagnosed to be sterile
- ECOG \_ Performance score ≤2
- Life expectancy ≥6 months
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects determined by an investigator to have a serious medical condition making study conduct difficult
- Subjects corresponding to the following conditions 1) Glomerular filtration rate ≤40 ml/min, 2) hemoglobin level ≤10.0 g/dL, 3) white cell count ≤4.0 × 109/L, 4) platelet count ≤100 × 109/L, 5) total bilirubin level ≥1.5 x upper normal limit, 6) serum albumin level ≤3.0 g/dL, 7) active ischemic heart disease or heart failure (New York Heart Association Classification III-IV), 8) uncontrolled diabetes/hypertension, 9) hyperkalemia \>6.0 mmol/L
- Vulnerable subjects (the investigator involved in the study or his/her family, research staff or students of the investigator involved in the study)
- Patients with a persistent malignancy other than the prostate cancer
- Patients who participated in a therapeutic clinical trial within the past 30 days and administered an investigational product other than standard treatment
- Patients are excluded if treatment other than the treatment provided in this study is determined more appropriate as determined by the investigator based on the patient and disease characteristics
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- FutureChemlead
Study Sites (1)
The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, St, Mary's Hospital, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu
Seoul, South Korea
Related Publications (5)
Zhou J, Neale JH, Pomper MG, Kozikowski AP. NAAG peptidase inhibitors and their potential for diagnosis and therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005 Dec;4(12):1015-26. doi: 10.1038/nrd1903.
PMID: 16341066BACKGROUNDMease RC, Foss CA, Pomper MG. PET imaging in prostate cancer: focus on prostate-specific membrane antigen. Curr Top Med Chem. 2013;13(8):951-62. doi: 10.2174/1568026611313080008.
PMID: 23590171BACKGROUNDLutje S, Heskamp S, Cornelissen AS, Poeppel TD, van den Broek SA, Rosenbaum-Krumme S, Bockisch A, Gotthardt M, Rijpkema M, Boerman OC. PSMA Ligands for Radionuclide Imaging and Therapy of Prostate Cancer: Clinical Status. Theranostics. 2015 Oct 18;5(12):1388-401. doi: 10.7150/thno.13348. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26681984BACKGROUNDMaurer T, Eiber M, Schwaiger M, Gschwend JE. Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management. Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Apr;13(4):226-35. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.26. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
PMID: 26902337BACKGROUNDHaberkorn U, Eder M, Kopka K, Babich JW, Eisenhut M. New Strategies in Prostate Cancer: Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Ligands for Diagnosis and Therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jan 1;22(1):9-15. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0820.
PMID: 26728408BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ji Youl Lee
The Catholic University of Korea
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 7, 2020
First Posted
August 12, 2020
Study Start
October 14, 2020
Primary Completion
June 30, 2022
Study Completion
June 30, 2022
Last Updated
October 20, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share