Acetated Ringer's Solution Versus Saline in Patients With Septic Shock
1 other identifier
interventional
2,000
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The primary aim of this trial is to compare the effect of acetated ringer's solution with that of saline for therapy on the incidence and development of major adverse renal events among septic shock patients. The investigators hypothesize that use of acetated ringer's solution for resuscitation among septic shock patients will reduce the incidence of major adverse kidney events.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2023
CompletedAugust 11, 2020
August 1, 2020
3.1 years
July 2, 2020
August 9, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of major adverse renal events in 28 days
Incidence of major adverse renal events
28 day
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Incidence of kidney injury
28 day
Serum creatinine(umol/L)
28 day
Study Arms (2)
saline group
PLACEBO COMPARATORUse saline for fluid resuscitation during the first 72 hours after enrollment
Acetated Ringer's solution group
EXPERIMENTALUse acetated Ringer's solution for fluid resuscitation during the first 72 hours after enrollment
Interventions
Use the choice of crystalloid for resuscitation during the first 72 hours after enrollment
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients presenting to the ICU diagnosed as septic shock within 24 hours.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy;
- Likely requirement for immediate hemodialysis or renal replacement therapy;
- Patients have already received fluids for more than 4 liters;
- Patient in extremis or death deemed imminent and inevitable.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (7)
Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S, Pilcher D, Bellomo R. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012. JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1308-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2637.
PMID: 24638143RESULTPeters E, Antonelli M, Wittebole X, Nanchal R, Francois B, Sakr Y, Vincent JL, Pickkers P. A worldwide multicentre evaluation of the influence of deterioration or improvement of acute kidney injury on clinical outcome in critically ill patients with and without sepsis at ICU admission: results from The Intensive Care Over Nations audit. Crit Care. 2018 Aug 3;22(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2112-z.
PMID: 30075798RESULTYunos NM, Kim IB, Bellomo R, Bailey M, Ho L, Story D, Gutteridge GA, Hart GK. The biochemical effects of restricting chloride-rich fluids in intensive care. Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov;39(11):2419-24. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822571e5.
PMID: 21705897RESULTSuetrong B, Pisitsak C, Boyd JH, Russell JA, Walley KR. Hyperchloremia and moderate increase in serum chloride are associated with acute kidney injury in severe sepsis and septic shock patients. Crit Care. 2016 Oct 6;20(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1499-7.
PMID: 27716310RESULTRaghunathan K, Shaw A, Nathanson B, Sturmer T, Brookhart A, Stefan MS, Setoguchi S, Beadles C, Lindenauer PK. Association between the choice of IV crystalloid and in-hospital mortality among critically ill adults with sepsis*. Crit Care Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1585-91. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000305.
PMID: 24674927RESULTYunos NM, Bellomo R, Hegarty C, Story D, Ho L, Bailey M. Association between a chloride-liberal vs chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults. JAMA. 2012 Oct 17;308(15):1566-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.13356.
PMID: 23073953RESULTSemler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP, Ehrenfeld JM, Wang L, Byrne DW, Stollings JL, Kumar AB, Hughes CG, Hernandez A, Guillamondegui OD, May AK, Weavind L, Casey JD, Siew ED, Shaw AD, Bernard GR, Rice TW; SMART Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 1;378(9):829-839. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1711584. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
PMID: 29485925RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Zhongda Hospital,Southeast University, China
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2020
First Posted
August 11, 2020
Study Start
September 1, 2020
Primary Completion
October 1, 2023
Study Completion
December 1, 2023
Last Updated
August 11, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08