Oxytocin and Approach-avoid in Grief
A Pull to be Close: the Differentiating Effects of Oxytocin and Grief Stimulus Type on Approach Behavior in Complicated Grief
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a completed project which was initiated prior to January 18,2017 Background: Theoretical models of complicated grief (CG) suggest that maladaptive approach (e.g., perseverative proximity-seeking of the deceased) or avoidance (e.g., excessive avoidance of reminders) behaviors interfere with a person's ability to integrate the loss and recover from their loved one's death. Due in part to conflicting evidence, little mechanistic understanding of how these behaviors develop in grief exists. We sought to (1) identify behavioral differences between CG and non-CG groups based on implicit bias for grief-, deceased-, and social-related stimuli, and (2) test the role of the neuropeptide oxytocin in shaping approach/avoidance bias. Methods: Widowed older adults with and without CG completed an approach/avoidance task measuring implicit bias for personalized, non-specific, grief-related, and other stimuli. In a double-blinded, randomized, counterbalanced design, each participant attended both an intranasal oxytocin session and a placebo session. Aims were to (1) identify differential effects of CG and stimulus type on implicit approach/avoidance bias \[placebo session\], and (2) investigate interactive effects of CG, stimulus type, and oxytocin vs. placebo on approach/avoidance bias \[both sessions\].
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 20, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 12, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 12, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 4, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 10, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 4, 2025
CompletedMarch 4, 2025
February 1, 2025
2.1 years
August 4, 2020
July 9, 2021
February 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reaction Time (ms) of a Push or Pull of a Joystick in a Standard Interactive Approach/Avoid Task.
Participants completed the approach avoid task twice per session, with reversed instructions on the second run (i.e., "pull for yellow" became "push for yellow"). Each seven-minute run of the task consisted of 144 2500ms trials (288 trials per visit, 576 trials total across runs/sessions; 500ms inter-trial-interval). Order of instructions (i.e., "push yellow" vs. "pull yellow") was randomized and counterbalanced across participants and sessions, to address potential for order effects/habituation. Stimuli were presented via Inquisit 4 (2014), in a pseudorandomized order determined by genetic algorithm (Wager \& Nichols, 2003). Relative approach/avoidance bias was computed by subtracting median response time (RT; latency to joystick full extension) on PULL/approach trials in each stimulus category from PUSH/avoid trials in the same category (Rinck \& Becker, 2007). Positive response bias values indicate relative approach bias; negative values indicate relative avoidance bias.
120 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Syntocinon First
EXPERIMENTALCrossover design, all participants received experimental condition at either visit one or visit two, and the placebo at the other visit. This arm designates those who received syntocinon at visit one and placebo at visit two. Syntocinon is 24 IU dose administered intranasally in spray form.
Placebo First
PLACEBO COMPARATORCrossover design, all participants received experimental condition at either visit one or visit two, and the placebo at the other visit. This arm designates those who received placebo at visit one, and syntocinon at visit two.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult individual experiencing death of a spouse or partner between 6 and 36 months prior to enrollment
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to comprehend English;
- medical contraindications for other components of the study,
- active suicidality
- active homicidality
- active psychotic symptoms
- ongoing major health conditions such as cancer; uncontrolled hypertension; and medications likely to impact the oxytocin system (e.g., systemic corticosteroids).
- pregnant status or suspected pregnant status
- premenopausal status
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, 85721, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Brian Arizmendi
- Organization
- University of Arizona
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2020
First Posted
August 10, 2020
Study Start
March 20, 2015
Primary Completion
May 12, 2017
Study Completion
May 12, 2017
Last Updated
March 4, 2025
Results First Posted
March 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02