Psychological Effects of Implant Loss
1 other identifier
observational
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Previous quality of life studies have suggested that long term satisfaction with breast reconstruction may be affected by postoperative complications. Complication frequencies, especially the risk for implant loss, is considerably higher in immediate than in delayed breast reconstruction. Knowledge about how implant loss affects the patient's experience of her breast reconstruction can guide us in the choice between immediate and delayed breast reconstruction in high risk patients and help us better prepare the patients for possible complications. This study will investigate patients' experiences with losing an implant in connection with immediate breast reconstruction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Mar 2020
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2025
CompletedJuly 3, 2025
June 1, 2025
5.3 years
July 30, 2020
June 30, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Experiences and psychological effects of implant loss after immediate breast reconstruction
Interviews
10 years
Effect on quality of life of implant loss: scale
Breast-Q reconstruction post-operative. It includes different domains: health-related quality of life (HR-QOL; including physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being) and patient satisfaction (including satisfaction with breasts, outcome, and care). Each scale produces an independent score from 0-100.a higher score means greater satisfaction or better QOL
10 years
Effect on body image of implant loss
Body-Esteem Scale for Adolescents and Adults (BESAA). It consists of three subscales: BE-appearance, BE-weight and BE-attribution.The scale has 23 items and the respondents indicated their degree of agreement on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always).High score indicates higher dimensions of the Body Esteem.
10 years
Effect on depression and anxiety of implant loss
Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD).The HADS is a fourteen item scale that generates: Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression.For both scales, scores of less than 7 indicate non-cases. 8-10 mild, 11-14 moderate, 15-21 severe.
10 years
Coping strategies
Brief-cope, a 28 item self-report questionnaire designed to measure effective and ineffective ways to cope with a stressful life event.Scores are presented for the two overarching coping styles: avoidant and approach.The scale can determine someone's primary coping styles.
10 years
Coping strategies
The Life orientation test - revised (Lot-R) is a 10-item scale that measures how optimistic or pessimistic people feel about the future. High values imply optimism.
10 years
Study Arms (3)
Interviewed -implant loss
Patients who have had immediate breast reconstruction and lost the implant due to for example infection.
Questionnaires - implant loss
Patients who have had immediate breast reconstruction and lost the implant due to for example infection.
Questionnaires - controls
Patients who have had immediate breast reconstruction without complications
Eligibility Criteria
Purposive criterion sampling technique is used. The population will identified through an operation planning software
You may qualify if:
- Biological women
- Age \>18 years
- Have lost an implant after a mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to give informed consent
- inability to speak and understand Swedish
- relapse of breast cancer after the reconstruction
- metastatic disease
- psychiatric co-morbidity.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Västra Götaland
Gothenburg, 413 45, Sweden
Related Publications (2)
Weick L, Ericson A, Sandman L, Bostrom P, Hansson E. Patient experience of implant loss after immediate breast reconstruction: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Care Women Int. 2023 Jan;44(1):61-79. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2021.1944152. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
PMID: 34427538RESULTWeick L, Lunde C, Hansson E. The effect of implant loss after immediate breast reconstruction on patient satisfaction with outcome and quality of life after five years - a case-control study. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2023 Feb-Dec;57(1-6):263-270. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2022.2061501. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
PMID: 35427208RESULT
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Emma Hansson, PhD
Göteborg University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 30, 2020
First Posted
August 6, 2020
Study Start
March 1, 2020
Primary Completion
June 30, 2025
Study Completion
June 30, 2025
Last Updated
July 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06