Transdiagnostic Treatment for Emotional Disorders

NCT04498949 | Completed DMC

• 1 other identifier: Unified Protocol
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 170
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Background and study aims Depression is more prevalent in younger populations. The age of first onset of depression has become younger, yet many adolescents with depressive symptoms remain untreated. Rates of anxiety and depression are increasing among children and young people.postsecondary education also represents a peak onset period for the occurrence of mental disorders. It is estimated that 12-46% of all university students are affected by mental health disorders in any given year. Who can participate? Afghan students over 18 years old fluent in Persian or Pashto, and access to an internet connection. What does the study involve? Participants will be randomly allocated to receive training in skills and coping strategies which are useful in stressful conditions.

Conditions

Depressive Symptoms; Anxiety; Emotional Problem

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (11)

• Beck anxiety inventory

  This is a 21-item self-report questionnaire for the measurement of anxiety symptoms experienced during the past week. Each item is rated from 0 to 3 (i.e. not at all, mildly, moderately, severely), added together to obtain a maximum score of 63. The BAI has demonstrated good to excellent internal consistency in prior validations of the scale (.85-.94), as well as adequate convergent and divergent validity . Cronbach's alpha for the BAI in the present study was excellent

  Baseline

• Beck anxiety inventory

  This is a 21-item self-report questionnaire for the measurement of anxiety symptoms experienced during the past week. Each item is rated from 0 to 3 (i.e. not at all, mildly, moderately, severely), added together to obtain a maximum score of 63. The BAI has demonstrated good to excellent internal consistency in prior validations of the scale (.85-.94), as well as adequate convergent and divergent validity . Cronbach's alpha for the BAI in the present study was excellent

  12 weeks after basel8ne

• Beck anxiety inventory

  This is a 21-item self-report questionnaire for the measurement of anxiety symptoms experienced during the past week. Each item is rated from 0 to 3 (i.e. not at all, mildly, moderately, severely), added together to obtain a maximum score of 63. The BAI has demonstrated good to excellent internal consistency in prior validations of the scale (.85-.94), as well as adequate convergent and divergent validity . Cronbach's alpha for the BAI in the present study was excellent

  Three month follow up

• Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS)

  he OASIS is a 5-item self-report scale that evaluates the frequency and severity of anxiety symptoms, the functional impairment related to these symptoms (i.e. school, work, home, or social impairment), and behavioral avoidance. Each item instructs respondents to endorse one of five responses that best describes their experiences over the past week. Response items are coded from 0 to 4, added together to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 20. Previous studies have shown high internal consistency.

  12 weeks after baseline

• Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS

  .The Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS; Bentley et al., 2014) is a 5-item self-report measure that was designed for assessing the frequency and intensity of depression symptoms, the functional impairment related to these depressive symptoms, as well as behavioral avoidance across emotional disorders. Each item of the ODSIS instructs respondents to endorse one of five responses that best describes their experiences over the past week. Response items are coded from 0 to 4 and can be summed to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 20.

  Baseline

• Emotional style questionnaire

  Emotional style questionnaire consists of 24 items that assess the following dimensions of emotional wellbeing: resilience, outlook; self-awareness, sensitivity to context; social intuition, and attention four item for each sub-scale. Respondents rate the extent to which each item applies to them on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 (almost never) to 7 (almost always). Total scores can range from 24 to 168, with higher scores reflecting greater levels of emotional wellbeing.

  baseline

• Emotional style questionnaire

  Emotional style questionnaire consists of 24 items that assess the following dimensions of emotional wellbeing: resilience, outlook; self-awareness, sensitivity to context; social intuition, and attention four item for each sub-scale. Respondents rate the extent to which each item applies to them on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 (almost never) to 7 (almost always). Total scores can range from 24 to 168, with higher scores reflecting greater levels of emotional wellbeing.

  12 weeks after baseline

• Emotional style questionnaire

  Emotional style questionnaire consists of 24 items that assess the following dimensions of emotional wellbeing: resilience, outlook; self-awareness, sensitivity to context; social intuition, and attention four item for each sub-scale. Respondents rate the extent to which each item applies to them on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 (almost never) to 7 (almost always). Total scores can range from 24 to 168, with higher scores reflecting greater levels of emotional wellbeing.

  Three month follow up

• Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-16)

  Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-16) consists of 16 items that assess the following dimensions of emotion regulation difficulties: nonacceptance of negative emotions (three items), inability to engage in goal-directed behaviors when distressed (three items), difficulties controlling impulsive behaviors when distressed (three items), limited access to emotion regulation strategies perceived as effective (five items), and lack of emotional clarity (two items). As with the original DERS, respondents rate the extent to which each item applies to them on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). Total scores on the DERS-16 can range from 16 to 80, with higher scores reflecting greater levels of emotion dysregulation.

  Baseline, :

• Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-16)

  Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-16) consists of 16 items that assess the following dimensions of emotion regulation difficulties: nonacceptance of negative emotions (three items), inability to engage in goal-directed behaviors when distressed (three items), difficulties controlling impulsive behaviors when distressed (three items), limited access to emotion regulation strategies perceived as effective (five items), and lack of emotional clarity (two items). As with the original DERS, respondents rate the extent to which each item applies to them on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). Total scores on the DERS-16 can range from 16 to 80, with higher scores reflecting greater levels of emotion dysregulation.

  12 weeks after baseline

• Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-16)

  Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-16) consists of 16 items that assess the following dimensions of emotion regulation difficulties: nonacceptance of negative emotions (three items), inability to engage in goal-directed behaviors when distressed (three items), difficulties controlling impulsive behaviors when distressed (three items), limited access to emotion regulation strategies perceived as effective (five items), and lack of emotional clarity (two items). As with the original DERS, respondents rate the extent to which each item applies to them on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). Total scores on the DERS-16 can range from 16 to 80, with higher scores reflecting greater levels of emotion dysregulation.

  Three month follow up

Secondary Outcomes (2)

• The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule or (PANAS)

  12 weeks after baseline

• The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule or (PANAS)

  Three months follow up

Study Arms (2)

Exprimental

EXPERIMENTAL

The unified protocol modules are as follows: Module 1: Setting the treatment goals and motivation augmentation Module 2: Using psychoeducation to learn the function of emotions and their development Module 3: Mindful (present-focused and non-judgmental) emotional awareness- Core module Module 4: Cognitive flexibility- Core module Module 5: Identifying and countering emotional avoidance behaviors- core module Module 6: Increasing awareness and confronting physical sensations/ interoceptive sensitivity- core module Module 7: Both situational and interoceptive emotion-focused exposures- Core module Module 8: Recognizing accomplishments and looking to the future (relapse prevention)

Behavioral: UP

Treatment as usual

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Treatment as usual care, Recieve consulting not included unified protocol Recieve supportive cares

Other: Treatment as usual

Interventions

UP BEHAVIORAL

The unified protocol modules are as follows: Module 1: Setting the treatment goals and motivation augmentation Module 2: Using psychoeducation to learn the function of emotions and their development Module 3: Mindful (present-focused and non-judgmental) emotional awareness- Core module Module 4: Cognitive flexibility- Core module Module 5: Identifying and countering emotional avoidance behaviors- core module Module 6: Increasing awareness and confronting physical sensations/ interoceptive sensitivity- core module Module 7: Both situational and interoceptive emotion-focused exposures- Core module Module 8: Recognizing accomplishments and looking to the future (relapse prevention)

Exprimental

Treatment as usual OTHER

Diagnostic test. Psychoeducation Supoortive care

Also known as: TAU

Treatment as usual

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 50 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• years or older
• Ability to understand and read Persian or Pashto
• Access to Internet at home and having an email address
• Meeting the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for ED (MDD, DD, MDNOS, PD, A, SAD, GAD, ADNOS, OCD)

You may not qualify if:

• Suffering from a severe mental disorder (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and alcohol and/or substance dependence disorder)
• The presence of a high risk of suicide
• other chronic or Medical disease/condition that prevents the participant
• receiving another psychological treatment during the last six month

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Mohamad hasan yousefi: lead

Study Sites (1)

Internet

Bāmyān, Afghanistan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depression; Anxiety Disorders

Interventions

Therapeutics

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral Symptoms; Behavior; Mental Disorders

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: DOUBLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: PhD student

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: July 16, 2020
• First Posted: August 5, 2020
• Study Start: August 15, 2020
• Primary Completion: November 30, 2020
• Study Completion: January 31, 2021
• Last Updated: March 18, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will share
• Shared Documents: CSR
• Time Frame: Between July 2022 to December 2022
• Access Criteria: Resonable request via academic email

Locations

AF (1)