Cognitive Conflict in Borderline Personality Disorder
BPDCONFLICT
Analysis of Personal Constructs in Borderline Personality Disorder and Its Relation With Severity and Therapeutic Outcome
1 other identifier
observational
156
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Background: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a severe psychological condition characterized by emotional, interpersonal and self-image instability in addition to impulsive behaviour. Although there have been several explanatory models and psychotherapy approaches that have been designed to comprehend and intervene on BPD, most seem not to recognize idiosyncratic cognitive conflict as an important feature on this disorder. Adding personal dilemmas, such as those conceptualized in personal construct theory, as a key element to BPD's explanatory model could provide a better picture to understand this disorder and possibly to enhance effectiveness of current psychotherapy approaches. Despite the fact that constructivist explanatory models have been used and tested in several clinical populations, there is little work done studying the relevance of inner conflicts in BPD. According to the prototypical symptomatology manifested by these patients, psychological instability can be assumed as a transversal feature present in this disorder; therefore, a larger amount of cognitive conflict can be expected in BPD patients. Method and Analysis: In order to test this assumption, this study aims to examine the characteristics of the interpersonal cognitive system of patients diagnosed with BPD and note their potential differences with the general population using the repertory grid technique, a complex assessment tool derived from personal construct theory. Statistical analyses will be performed to examine whether the clinical sample tends to present with more cases and with higher number of cognitive conflicts than the control group. Likewise, the association between cognitive conflict and symptom severity will be explored. Results will be a first step to determine if cognitive conflicts have an important role in the explanation of BPD. This will also help to value the convenience to further investigate the efficacy of conflict resolution psychotherapy interventions with these patients. This research work is undertaken in the context of a funded predoctoral research program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Apr 2019
Typical duration for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 2, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 4, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2022
CompletedMay 18, 2022
May 1, 2022
1.9 years
July 30, 2020
May 17, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Implicative dilemma
The repertory grid technique (RGT) is a personalized assessment procedure using a structured interview designed to make explicit the personal constructs (bipolar dimensions of subjective meaning) used to interpret and organize reality. An implicative dilemma can be identified when an individual does not perform a desired change due to the negative implications involved for their desired identity. The RGT can detect personal constructs in which the current perception of the self is similar to the ideal self (congruent constructs) and the constructs in which the subject's self-perception is contrary to their ideal construction (discrepant construct). A statistical analysis of the RGT reveals when a potential pole shift of a discrepant construct involves the pole shift of a congruent construct due to an existing association between the two constructs. Implicative dilemmas may cause dissatisfaction and psychological discomfort.
Through study completion, an average of 2 years.
Dilemmatic construct
Dilemmatic constructs can be identified when an individual is not sure how would they like to be in a certain identity aspect. This type of cognitive conflict can be assessed and analyzed with the RGT in order to identify self-construction domains in which the person may find it difficult to choose how to ideally be. Indecision in regard to identity can add psychological distress to those who experience it.
Through study completion, an average of 2 years.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines - Revised (DIB-R)
Through study completion, an average of 2 years.
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-II (SCID-II)
Through study completion, an average of 2 years.
Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure (CORE-OM)
Through study completion, an average of 2 years.
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21)
Through study completion, an average of 2 years.
Study Arms (2)
Borderline Personality Disorder
Borderline personality disorder diagnosed participants
Control
Healthy participants
Interventions
Psychological assessment with the repertory grid technique (RGT) in order to quantify cognitive conflicts.
Eligibility Criteria
Study Population: The borderline personality group will be formed by participants diagnosed with BPD that receive treatment from outpatient or inpatient public and private mental health facilities in the local area of Barcelona, Spain (CSMA Benito Menni, ITA - especialistas en salud mental and ITLímit). The control group will be formed by healthy volunteers of a student sample from the University of Barcelona and a nonstudent community sample who were not receiving psychotherapy when evaluated. These participants will be matched by age, gender and educational level with the clinical sample.
You may qualify if:
- Aged between 18 and 60 years old.
- Having been diagnosed with BPD by a well-trained professional according to DSM-5 criteria.
You may not qualify if:
- Having been diagnosed with bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, prevalent continued and active substance abuse, disabling physical illness, organic cerebral dysfunctions or mental developmental severe difficulties.
- Not able to communicate either in Spanish or Catalan.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
ITA - especialistas en salud mental
Barcelona, 08006, Spain
CSMA Bennito Menni - (Germanes Hospitalaries)
Barcelona, 08035, Spain
ITLimit
Sant Cugat del Vallès, 08195, Spain
Related Publications (8)
Feixas G, Saul LA, Avila-Espada A. Viewing Cognitive Conflicts as Dilemmas: Implications for Mental Health. J Constr Psychol. 2009 Apr;22(2):141-169. doi: 10.1080/10720530802675755. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
PMID: 22629109BACKGROUNDMontesano A, Lopez-Gonzalez MA, Saul LA, Feixas G. A review of cognitive conflicts research: a meta-analytic study of prevalence and relation to symptoms. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Dec 4;11:2997-3006. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S91861. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26675503BACKGROUNDFeixas G, Compan V. Dilemma-focused intervention for unipolar depression: a treatment manual. BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 12;16:235. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0947-x.
PMID: 27406383BACKGROUNDFeixas G, Bados A, Garcia-Grau E, Paz C, Montesano A, Compan V, Salla M, Aguilera M, Trujillo A, Canete J, Medeiros-Ferreira L, Soriano J, Ibarra M, Medina JC, Ortiz E, Lana F. A DILEMMA-FOCUSED INTERVENTION FOR DEPRESSION: A MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL WITH A 3-MONTH FOLLOW-UP. Depress Anxiety. 2016 Sep;33(9):862-9. doi: 10.1002/da.22510. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
PMID: 27103215BACKGROUNDFeixas G, Paz C, Garcia-Grau E, Montesano A, Medina JC, Bados A, Trujillo A, Ortiz E, Compan V, Salla M, Aguilera M, Guasch V, Codina J, Winter DA. One-year follow-up of a randomized trial with a dilemma-focused intervention for depression: Exploring an alternative to problem-oriented strategies. PLoS One. 2018 Dec 13;13(12):e0208245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208245. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30543642BACKGROUNDPaz C, Montesano A, Winter D, Feixas G. Cognitive conflict resolution during psychotherapy: Its impact on depressive symptoms and psychological distress. Psychother Res. 2019 Jan;29(1):45-57. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1405172. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
PMID: 29173128BACKGROUNDFeixas G, Saul LA. The Multi-Center Dilemma Project: an investigation on the role of cognitive conflicts in health. Span J Psychol. 2004 May;7(1):69-78. doi: 10.1017/s1138741600004765.
PMID: 15139250BACKGROUNDStorebo OJ, Stoffers-Winterling JM, Vollm BA, Kongerslev MT, Mattivi JT, Jorgensen MS, Faltinsen E, Todorovac A, Sales CP, Callesen HE, Lieb K, Simonsen E. Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 4;5(5):CD012955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012955.pub2.
PMID: 32368793BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Guillem Feixas, Professor
University of Barcelona
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 30, 2020
First Posted
August 4, 2020
Study Start
April 2, 2019
Primary Completion
March 1, 2021
Study Completion
March 1, 2022
Last Updated
May 18, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05