Internet-delivered CBT-I (Space for Sleep): Pilot and Feasibility
Internet-delivered CBT Intervention (Space for Sleep) for Insomnia: Pilot and Feasibility Study in a Routine Care Setting
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The principal objective of the study is to assess the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an online-delivered CBT-I intervention for those with insomnia or reporting sleep difficulties. The program will be offered to service users of IAPT to establish criteria for the planning of a future large scale RCT study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 5, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 21, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 9, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2020
CompletedJanuary 29, 2021
January 1, 2021
10 months
July 9, 2020
January 28, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Changes in insomnia severity (as measured by the Insomnia Severity Index, ISI)
The 7-item ISI (Yang, Morin, Schaefer, \& Wallenstein, 2009) provides a quantitative index of overall sleep impairment. Participants rate the severity of sleep problems (e.g. problems with sleep onset, sleep maintenance, and early morning awakening), interference with daytime functioning, how noticeable the impairment is to others, distress or concern caused by the sleep problem(s), as well as satisfaction with the current sleep pattern on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0-28, with higher scores indicating more severe insomnia. The ISI has been shown to be a valid and reliable measure that is sensitive to changes in treatment studies (Bastien, Vallières, \& Morin, 2001; Thorndike et al., 2011).
Baseline - Immediately after the intervention
Changes in average sleep efficiency (i.e. total time spent asleep divided by the total time spent in bed in a given day)
Sleep efficiency is the result of total time spent asleep divided by the total time spent in bed and multiplied by 100. Participants will be encouraged to complete a sleep diary which is available to them as a tool on the platform. They will be encouraged to complete this throughout treatment and will be prompted to do so upon their daily login. Data from the first and last week will be used as pre- and post-treatment measurements. Sleep efficiency of 85% or above is considered normal, with really good efficiency being 90% or above.
Baseline - Immediately after the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Baseline - Immediately after the intervention
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Baseline - Immediately after the intervention
Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)
Baseline - Immediately after the intervention
Patient Experience Questionnaire (PEQ)
Immediately after the intervention
Acceptability of the modules
Immediately after each module of the intervention
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Space for Sleep Group
EXPERIMENTALSilverCloud internet-delivered CBT intervention for Insomnia
Interventions
'Space for Sleep' is a seven-module online CBT-based intervention for sleep. The structure and content of the programme modules follow evidence-based CBT principles for insomnia. Each module is structured to incorporate introductory quizzes. videos, informational content, interactive activities, as well as homework suggestions and summaries. In addition, personal stories and accounts from other users are incorporated into the presentation of the material. As per normal service provision, each participant will be assigned a clinician (PWP) who will monitor participants' progress through the program. Every one to two weeks, the PWP will login and review participants' progress, leaving feedback for them and responding to the work they have completed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least 18 years old
- Reporting difficulty getting to sleep and/or staying asleep as their primary presentation
- Suitability for an internet intervention (i.e. willingness to engage on the iCBT intervention, ability to read English, access internet, the capacity and willingness to consent)
- No suicidal or self-harm risk and no specific communication needs.
You may not qualify if:
- Score above 0 on PHQ-9 question 9
- Diagnosed psychotic illness
- Currently on psychological or pharmacological treatment for sleep disorder
- Alcohol or drug misuse
- Previous diagnosis of an organic mental health disorder,
- Have an unstable medication regimen.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Silver Cloud Healthlead
- Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
- University of Dublin, Trinity Collegecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust
Bracknell, RG12 1LD, United Kingdom
Related Publications (12)
Bastien CH, Vallieres A, Morin CM. Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Med. 2001 Jul;2(4):297-307. doi: 10.1016/s1389-9457(00)00065-4.
PMID: 11438246BACKGROUNDChristensen H, Batterham PJ, Gosling JA, Ritterband LM, Griffiths KM, Thorndike FP, Glozier N, O'Dea B, Hickie IB, Mackinnon AJ. Effectiveness of an online insomnia program (SHUTi) for prevention of depressive episodes (the GoodNight Study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;3(4):333-41. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00536-2. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
PMID: 26827250BACKGROUNDClark DM. Implementing NICE guidelines for the psychological treatment of depression and anxiety disorders: the IAPT experience. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;23(4):318-27. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2011.606803.
PMID: 22026487BACKGROUNDKroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
PMID: 11556941BACKGROUNDMundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, Greist JH. The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 May;180:461-4. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.5.461.
PMID: 11983645BACKGROUNDRichards DA, Suckling R. Improving access to psychological therapies: phase IV prospective cohort study. Br J Clin Psychol. 2009 Nov;48(Pt 4):377-96. doi: 10.1348/014466509X405178. Epub 2009 Feb 9.
PMID: 19208291BACKGROUNDSpitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA. 1999 Nov 10;282(18):1737-44. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.18.1737.
PMID: 10568646BACKGROUNDSpitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
PMID: 16717171BACKGROUNDThorndike FP, Ritterband LM, Saylor DK, Magee JC, Gonder-Frederick LA, Morin CM. Validation of the insomnia severity index as a web-based measure. Behav Sleep Med. 2011;9(4):216-23. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2011.606766.
PMID: 22003975BACKGROUNDYang M, Morin CM, Schaefer K, Wallenstein GV. Interpreting score differences in the Insomnia Severity Index: using health-related outcomes to define the minimally important difference. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Oct;25(10):2487-94. doi: 10.1185/03007990903167415.
PMID: 19689221BACKGROUNDZachariae R, Lyby MS, Ritterband LM, O'Toole MS. Efficacy of internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sleep Med Rev. 2016 Dec;30:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
PMID: 26615572BACKGROUNDZahra D, Qureshi A, Henley W, Taylor R, Quinn C, Pooler J, Hardy G, Newbold A, Byng R. The work and social adjustment scale: reliability, sensitivity and value. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2014 Jun;18(2):131-8. doi: 10.3109/13651501.2014.894072. Epub 2014 Mar 16.
PMID: 24527886BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Derek Richards
SilverCloud Health
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sarah Sollesse
Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 9, 2020
First Posted
July 30, 2020
Study Start
September 5, 2019
Primary Completion
June 21, 2020
Study Completion
June 21, 2020
Last Updated
January 29, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share