Comparison of Concussion Education Programs
1 other identifier
interventional
118
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Importance: Concussion underreporting leads to delays in diagnosis and treatment, resulting in prolonged recovery. Athletes' report of concussion symptoms is therefore an important component of risk reduction. Numerous educational interventions to improve concussion knowledge and reporting exist. Objective: Evaluate the comparative efficacy of three concussion education programs in improving concussion-reporting intention. Design: Randomized clinical trial conducted from August 2018 to October 2018, with assessment before, immediately after, and one-month after educational intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2020
CompletedJuly 30, 2020
July 1, 2020
3 months
July 23, 2020
July 27, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Improvement in concussion reporting intention among athletes
All primary and secondary outcomes, besides those related to concussion knowledge, were assessed based on athlete responses, on a 10-point Likert type scale ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 10=strongly agree, to specific questions related to that domain. A composite measure for each outcome was created by summing athletes' responses and dividing by the number of questions asked, resulting in outcomes scaled from 1 to 10. A composite measure created based on the inverse of athlete responses to five questions about their concussion-reporting intention (i.e., whether they would continue playing with a concussion during "the beginning of the season," "a practice," "the middle of the season," "during a championship game," and "at the end of the season").
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Improvement in concussion knowledge among athletes
1 month
Improvement in concussion attitudes among athletes
1 month
Improvement in concussion perceived normative beliefs among athletes
1 month
Improvement in concussion perceived behavioral control among athletes
1 month
Study Arms (3)
Crashcourse
ACTIVE COMPARATORCC uses an approach to providing concussion education informed by user-centered formative design research studies. The program features an interactive "choose your own adventure" approach to navigate the learner through the content, and is guided by near-peer Division I collegiate football athletes
CDC Video
ACTIVE COMPARATORCDC-Vi is an online learning module developed by the CDC and the National Federation of State High School Associations Learning Center. Learners progress through the curriculum sequentially completing each unit before proceeding to the next. The primary narrator of CDC-Vi is Dr. Mick Koester, Chair of the NFHS Sports Medicine Advisory Committee
CDC Written
ACTIVE COMPARATORCDC-Wr consists of educational PDFs available for download from the CDC website, as part of the CDC's "Heads Up" brain injury awareness initiative. The PDFs used for the CDC-Wr condition were specific to high school athlete concussion education
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Athletes from three high school football teams in California.
- In attendance for practice on both study dates
- Provided signed assent and parental consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Did not complete more than 50% of the questionnaire.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2020
First Posted
July 30, 2020
Study Start
August 1, 2018
Primary Completion
October 31, 2018
Study Completion
October 31, 2018
Last Updated
July 30, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
Via contact with study PI, and pending approval of IRB