COVID-19 Infection Screening in Cancer Patients (NEOSCREENCOVID)
NEOSCREENCOVID
2 other identifiers
interventional
214
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Since December 2019, outbreak of COVID-19 caused by a novel virus SARS-Cov-2 has spread rapidly around the world and became a pandemic issue. Cancer patients seem to be at higher risk of infection and evolution to severe forms related to immunosuppression, according to the first published data from Chinese experience. However, the role of confounding factors such as age and smoking habits cannot be independently assessed. Supplementary data from a large retrospective Italian cohort suggest that the proportion of cancer patients with severe form of COVID-19 could be lower than expected. In addition, the proportion of asymptomatic SARS-Cov-2 infected cancer patients is unknown. Based on academic and expert's recommendations, most of cancer units have already modified cancer treatment during the pandemic, in order to limit the number of outpatient visits / inpatient admissions and then reduce or avoid cross infection of COVID-19, although the negative impact on patient's outcome (cancer recurrence or mortality) has not been established. Thus, a large screening for SARS-Cov-2 infection in treated cancer patients could help to: - Define an accurate prevalence of COVID-19 immunization in this population - Aggregate data on the relationship between clinical characteristics in cancer patients and COVID-19 risk. - Provide information about asymptomatic COVID-19 cases. - Organize effectively cancer units to separate infected and non-infected patients. The RT-PCR gold-standard test for COVID-19 on nasal and pharyngeal swabs has limitations, as the test is not universally available, turnaround times can be lengthy, and reported sensitivities vary. It does not provide information about immunization status. Serological assays may be important for understanding the epidemiology of emerging SARS-Cov-2, including the burden and role of asymptomatic infections. Thus, the development of new devices or techniques for accurate diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infections, of fast and safe use, that could be spread in the local hospitals and clinics, would be a major advance for identifying and treating patients. In addition, information about the immunization of fragile people, such as cancer patients, could help to plan a safe strategy for anti-cancer treatment schedule and for the end of quarantine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable cancer
Started Jul 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 12, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 12, 2021
CompletedSeptember 30, 2025
June 1, 2021
10 months
July 28, 2020
September 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To evaluate the prevalence of COVID-19
The rate of prevalence will be defined as the ratio of the number of positive patients to the number of patients tested based on the rapid serological test (presence of IgM and/or IgG).
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (8)
To evaluate patient's and health care professional's perception about the rapid serological test.
Day 1
To evaluate the concordance of COVID-19 positivity by the rapid serological test compared to the gold-standard RT-PCR on nasal swab for eligible patients
Day 1
To evaluate the concordance of COVID-19 positivity by the rapid serological test compared to a classic serological test (ELISA method) from whole blood
Day 1
To evaluate the proportion of the patients who will have at least one positive testing among all the methods applied.
6 months
To evaluate the number of patients who will get at least one new testing after the rapid serological test has been performed.
6 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Experimental arm
EXPERIMENTALscreening using a rapid serological test with a drop of blood from a finger prick.
Interventions
screening using a rapid serological test with a drop of blood from a finger prick
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18-years old;
- Patient treated for histologically proven cancer;
- Patient that require at least one visit for anti-cancer treatment in a one-day outpatient care units
- Patients that have previously been tested positive with a RT-PCR test from nasal swab that have been authorized to come to the hospital (after recovery or a 14-days quarantine period, according to local guidelines) can be included. 5. Patient willing and able to provide written informed consent/assent for the trial;
- \. Patient affiliated with a health insurance system.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient not able to give free consent
- Patient not able to understand the protocol;
- Patient not able to undergo the COVID-19 test
- Vulnerable persons as defined by article L1121-5 - 8:
- Pregnant women, women in labour or breast-feeding mothers, persons deprived of their freedom by judicial or administrative decision, persons hospitalized without their consent by virtue of articles L. 3212-1 and L. 3213-1 and who are not subject to the provisions of article L. 1121-8
- Persons admitted to a social or health facility for reasons other than research
- Adults subject to a legal protection order or unable to give their consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Nice, 06189, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2020
First Posted
July 30, 2020
Study Start
July 21, 2020
Primary Completion
May 12, 2021
Study Completion
November 12, 2021
Last Updated
September 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2021-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share