Ultrasound Crestal Bone Topography of Edentulous Ridges
Evaluation of Crestal Bone Topography of Edentulous Ridges: A Retrospective Study Comparing Ultrasonography to Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)
1 other identifier
observational
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A successful implant surgery primarily relies on a prudent evaluation of oral anatomy and meticulous treatment planning. Additionally, of paramount importance that dictates the types of procedures, material selection and ultimately success of implant surgery is the quality and quantity of the edentulous ridge. Ultrasound imaging (US), another cross-sectional imaging modality, has been extensively used in the medical diagnostics field. The ability of ultrasound to image soft tissue-bone interface makes it particularly promising for studying bone ridge width and crestal bone topography. Therefore, this retrospective human study aimed to compare bone width measurements between US and CBCT. This study also investigated the possible correlation between the crestal bone surface quality imaged by US and CBCT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jun 2020
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 17, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedJanuary 15, 2021
January 1, 2021
6 months
July 17, 2020
January 13, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy of ultrasound for estimating ridge width
measure the edentulous ridge width at 1, 2 and 3 mm apical to the crest on ultrasound images
up to 3 months after image was taken
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy of ultrasound for assessing ridge surface quality
up to 3 months after image was taken
Study Arms (1)
Group with edentulous ridge
This group had edentulous ridge planning to receive a dental implant and had ultrasound and cone-beam computed tomography images of the ridge.
Eligibility Criteria
Records of patients who had at least 1 edentulous ridge with a plan for implant placement, had cone-beam computed tomography as standard procedure and ultrasound imaging for off-label use of evaluating the ridge were included.
You may qualify if:
- Patient records at the Graduate Periodontal Clinic
- With both US and CBCT scans taking within 3 months between each other from Jan 2016 to Mar 2020
- These images had to include at least one edentulous ridge at the anterior, premolar or molar site.
- Multiple sites in a given patient may be included.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Michigan School of Dentistry
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 17, 2020
First Posted
July 27, 2020
Study Start
June 16, 2020
Primary Completion
December 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
January 15, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Not plan to share IPD.