Macroscopic on Site Evaluation (MOLSE) vs Standard Specimen Acquisition of Solid Lesions During EUS-FNB
MOSE
1 other identifier
interventional
370
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with tissue acquisition (TA) is nowadays a well-established technique for the sampling of solid lesions pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions. Actually the standard methods to obtain sampling in gastrointestinal (GI) and non-GI solid masses is the fine needle aspiration (FNA) performed by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Its sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy for malignant cytology are actually reported of 85-95%, 95%-98% and 78-95% respectively. These data could be affected by the presence of cytopathologist in endoscopy room during the tissue sampling. The rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) has been advocated to significantly increase EUS-FNA accuracy. To overcome this problem fine needle biopsy (FNB) for TA to obtain histological specimens was proposed. These needles allow as the acquisition of an histological specimen than the cytological one with FNA needles. Recently, the need to obtain a histological, instead of a cytological, specimen during EUS has become more urgent and necessary due to innovative oncological treatment options. An acquired histological specimen could avoid the need of a cytopathologist in the endoscopic room, diminishing costs, procedures time, number of passes and reducing the additional costs of a possible repeated EUS-FNA, in case of an inconclusive diagnosis. With the advent of FNB, the macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of the specimen by the endosonographer was proposed, resulting in a comparable alternative to ROSE.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 17, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 17, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 24, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2021
CompletedJuly 24, 2020
July 1, 2020
1 year
July 17, 2020
July 22, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To assess the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB with MOSE vs EUS-FNB alone.
Diagnostic accuracy will be measure
12 Months
Study Arms (2)
non MOSE arm
EXPERIMENTALThree needle passes will be performed for each mass
MOSE arm
EXPERIMENTALThe endoscopist will perform biopsy until a macroscopic visible core (MVC) will be obtained and specimen will be placed in a container (Container A-MOSE). If the needle passes performed are less than 3 (1 or 2 passes) the specimens acquired in the remnant passes to join standard care of 3 passes, according to ESGE guidelines, will be placed in a second container (Container B).
Interventions
After each pass, the stylet will be introduced into the needle, the material will be released onto a smear slide, and a macroscopic on-site quality evaluation (MOSE) of the specimen will be performed by the endoscopist.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age greater than 18, both genders.
- Both in-patient and out-patients.
- Presence of a solid lesion. In the presence of a cystic component, the solid part of the lesion should be more 75% of the total.
- FNB performed by a 22G needle Acquire® (Boston Scientific).
- Tissue acquisition with fanning technique.
- Obtained informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients underwent EUS-FNA with or without ROSE
- Patients underwent EUS-FNB plus ROSE.
- Previous biopsy of the lesion with diagnosis of malignancy
- Presence of an uncorrectable coagulopathy as defined by abnormal prothrombin time (PT) or partial thromboplastin time (PTT) that does not normalize after administration of fresh frozen plasma.
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
- Patients unable to understand and/or read the consent form.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit
Castellanza, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Mangiavillano B, Crino SF, Facciorusso A, Di Matteo F, Barbera C, Larghi A, Rizzatti G, Carrara S, Spadaccini M, Auriemma F, Fabbri C, Binda C, Coluccio C, Marocchi G, Staiano T, Conti Bellocchi MC, Bernardoni L, Eusebi LH, Cirota GG, De Nucci G, Stigliano S, Manes G, Bonanno G, Ofosu A, Lamonaca L, Paduano D, Spatola F, Repici A. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without macroscopic on-site evaluation: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Endoscopy. 2023 Feb;55(2):129-137. doi: 10.1055/a-1915-5263. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
PMID: 36044915DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 17, 2020
First Posted
July 24, 2020
Study Start
July 17, 2020
Primary Completion
July 31, 2021
Study Completion
July 31, 2021
Last Updated
July 24, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share