Analgesic Effect of Erector Spinae Versus Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy
A Comparative Study of the Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy Surgeries
1 other identifier
interventional
110
1 country
1
Brief Summary
- Thoracic incisions are painful and associated with chronic post-surgical pain and inadequate analgesia is associated with poorer postoperative outcomes. Recent progress has been made in the field of thoracic anesthesia by improving analgesic modalities such as PECS 1 and PECS 2, intercostal plane block, paravertebral regional anesthesia, ultrasound-guided erector spinae and serratus anterior plane block.
- Administered of the local anesthetic in erector spinae plane block is in the interfascial plane between the transverse process of the vertebra and the erector spinae muscles, spreading to multiple paravertebral spaces. It affects both the ventral and dorsal rami and leading to blockage of both visceral and somatic pain.
- Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block is a facial plane block that provides analgesia by blocking of lateral branches of intercostal nerves above or below the serratus plane muscle.
- We hypothesize that the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block may have better quality than the serratus anterior plane block for patients undergoing thoracoscopic sympathectomy as erector spinea plane blocks visceral and somatic pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 22, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 24, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 14, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2022
CompletedFebruary 8, 2021
September 1, 2020
10 months
July 22, 2020
February 5, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The total analgesic consumption
cumulative consumption of opioids during the first postoperative day
1st 24 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Postoperative severity of the pain
every 2 hours for 12hours and then at 16, 20 and 24 hours postoperatively
The total amount of fentanyl consumption
1st 24 hours after surgery
The total amount of paracetamol consumption
1st 24 hours after surgery
Duration of analgesia
within 24 hours after surgery
Nausea
1st 24 hours after surgery
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Erector spinae plane block (ESP)
EXPERIMENTALPatients would receive erector spinae plane block
Serratus anterior plane block (SAP)
EXPERIMENTALPatients would receive serratus anterior plane block
Interventions
Erector Spinae Group (Group E) will receive bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block using 30 ml hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected between erector spinae muscle and transverse process of T4
Serratus anterior Group (Group S) will undergo bilateral ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block with 30 ml hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected above or below serratus anterior muscle at the level of 4th and 5th rib on the midaxillary line
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I or II physical status
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who had coagulopathies
- local infections
- neuropathies
- neuromuscular disease
- psychiatric disease
- history of thoracic surgery
- history of allergy to local anesthetics.
- receiving chronic analgesic therapy
- drug abusers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, DK, 050, Egypt
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mohamed Y Makharita, MD
Professor of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive care,P
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Doaa G Diab, MD
Associate Professor of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive care,
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Single-blind (participant) study
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 22, 2020
First Posted
July 24, 2020
Study Start
September 14, 2020
Primary Completion
July 1, 2021
Study Completion
January 1, 2022
Last Updated
February 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- after completing the study and being accepted for publication.
- Access Criteria
- The data will be accessible to the investigators and PRS administrators with hiding the identifiers for the patients
Study Protocol Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) Informed Consent Form (ICF) Clinical Study Report (CSR)