NCT04482387

Brief Summary

This trial aims to assess the accuracy and test-retest variability of a new digital app which enables community visual acuity testing without requirement of an trained examiner.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 17, 2020

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 22, 2020

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 24, 2020

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2021

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 5, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

August 5, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

July 17, 2020

Results QC Date

November 27, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 23, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mean Bias Between the Difference Between DigiVis and Standard Visual Assessment Compared to the Mean of DigiVis and Standard Visual Assessment

    The mean bias (difference) in visual acuity assessment score between the difference in DigiVis and standard testing in logMAR units and the mean of DigiVis and standard testing in logMAR units was calculated. Where 0.00 logMAR is the value representing perfect distance visual acuity (equivalent to 20/20 Snellen acuity) and 1.00 logMAR is the value representing worst distance visual acuity (equivalent to 20/200 Snellen acuity).

    within 30 days

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Mean Bias Between Repeated DigiVis Test Assessments

    within 30 days

Study Arms (1)

Subjects recruited to visual acuity testing

OTHER

All recruited subjects will have the intervention (Digivis visual acuity self-testing) and the standard clinical visual acuity assessment in clinic.

Device: DigiVis visual acuity app

Interventions

Self-testing of visual acuity app on two occasions

Subjects recruited to visual acuity testing

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 5 and 85 years
  • Previous recorded visual acuity of at least +0.8 logMAR in or both eyes

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals with poor conversant English
  • Individuals with cognitive impairment
  • Subjects unable to access the internet on two digital devices

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust

Cambridge, Cambs, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Rono HK, Bastawrous A, Macleod D, Wanjala E, Di Tanna GL, Weiss HA, Burton MJ. Smartphone-based screening for visual impairment in Kenyan school children: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Aug;6(8):e924-e932. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30244-4.

    PMID: 30012273BACKGROUND
  • Bastawrous A, Rono HK, Livingstone IA, Weiss HA, Jordan S, Kuper H, Burton MJ. Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test (Peek Acuity) for Clinical Practice and Community-Based Fieldwork. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;133(8):930-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1468.

    PMID: 26022921BACKGROUND
  • Thirunavukarasu AJ, Mullinger D, Rufus-Toye RM, Farrell S, Allen LE. Clinical validation of a novel web-application for remote assessment of distance visual acuity. Eye (Lond). 2022 Oct;36(10):2057-2061. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01760-2. Epub 2021 Aug 30.

    PMID: 34462579BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Vision Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Sensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesEye DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Limitations and Caveats

The study recruited a smaller number of participants than originally intended but 120 participants was sufficient to enable narrow 95% confidence limits.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Stephen Kelleher
Organization
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Study Officials

  • Stephen E Kelleher

    Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: Patients will test their own vision twice using the DigiVis app twice, subsequently they will have visual acuity assessment in eye clinic by a trained examiner. The results of visual acuity will be compared using Bland Altman statistical analysis.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2020

First Posted

July 22, 2020

Study Start

July 24, 2020

Primary Completion

August 1, 2021

Study Completion

August 1, 2021

Last Updated

August 5, 2024

Results First Posted

August 5, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations