NCT04480684

Brief Summary

Perineal injury following childbirth can result in complications such as wound infection. The perineum has closely related anatomical structures including the external genital organs and the anal triangle which contains the anal sphincter muscles. Therefore as wound infection can extend and as muscles of the perineum sit in such close proximity to each other, the anal sphincter muscles could potentially be affected. This could also potentially include cases of perineal injury where the anal sphincter was not injured. However ultrasound has never been used to investigate this. Endoanal ultrasound is the gold standard diagnostic tool in the assessment of obstetric anal sphincter injury. The anal sphincter can also be visualised using multiplanar transperineal ultrasound(three/four-dimensional. Therefore both modalities could be used. However, it has been shown that transperineal ultrasound has a high positive predictive value and therefore is able to correctly identify an intact anal sphincter, but low positive predictive value; meaning poor detection of sphincter defects. Therefore, although it cannot completely substitute endoanal ultrasound (the gold standard in investigating obstetric anal sphincter injuries), it provides and adjunct/alternative for women who cannot tolerate endoanal ultrasound. The investigators plan to perform an observational study to evaluate to the natural history of perineal wound infections. Patients will be assessed weekly with endoanal ultrasound and/or transperineal ultrasound until the wound infection has resolved and the wound has clinically healed. If a bacterial wound swab has not been taken prior to recruitment or wound swab results are not available, one will be taken to detect the causative organisms. Appropriate antibiotics will then be given to cover the detected organism. Bacterial burden and will also be measured weekly using the MolecuLight i:X; a bacterial autofluorescence camera which captures the presence and load of bacteria. In wounds that have superficially dehisced; exact wound measurements including wound surface area, depth, volume and healing progress will be precisely measured using the Silhouette® 3D camera

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2020

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 10, 2020

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 21, 2020

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 14, 2020

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 14, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 14, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

September 16, 2021

Status Verified

September 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

July 10, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 14, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Obstetric Anal Sphincter InjuryChildbirth related perineal traumaPerineal wound infectionEndoanal ultrasoundTransperineal ultrasound3D Ultrasound4D Ultrasound

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in sphincter defect 3-point radial angle

    Endoanal ultrasound and/or transperineal ultrasound will be performed to assess involvement of the anal sphincter. Anal sphincter defects will measured on both modalities with a 3-point angle, with the angle vertex in the middle of the anal canal. The 3D volume will be assessed at the deep, superficial, and subcutaneous levels for defects. A change in radial angle size will be measured. On transperineal ultrasound the extent of the defect will be measured circumferentially using a 3-point radial angle(0 degrees being no defect). A change in radial angle size will be measured.

    Baseline until wound infection resolved and wound healed, or up to 16 weeks

  • Change in sphincter defect Stark Score

    On endoanal ultrasound, anal sphincter defects will also be scored using a validated Starck score which accounts for depth, length and size of the defect for both internal and external anal sphincter, with a range from 0 being no defect to 16 being maximal defect. Therefore, a change in this score will be measured.

    Baseline until wound infection resolved and wound healed, or up to 16 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in bacterial fluorescence patterns

    Baseline until wound infection resolved and wound healed, or up to 16 weeks

  • Change in wound dimensions

    Baseline until wound infection resolved and wound healed, or up to 16 weeks

Interventions

Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound is the gold standard diagnostic tool in the assessment of obstetric anal sphincter injury. The anorectal transducer is inserted directly into the anal canal which allows assessment of the anal sphincter complex. Patients will be assessed at weekly intervals with until the wound infection has resolved and the wound has clinically healed.

If endoanal ultrasound is declined or not tolerated, the anal sphincter will also be assessed using three-/four-dimensional (3D/4D) transperineal ultrasound with the probe placed externally on the area of the fourchette. Patients will be assessed at weekly intervals with until the wound infection has resolved and the wound has clinically healed.

The bacterial load of the perineal wound will be measured every week using the MolecuLight i:X. This is a system, which uses fluorescent illumination to capture and document the presence of bacteria. Patients will be assessed at weekly intervals with until the wound infection has resolved and the wound has clinically healed. These findings will be supported by microbiological analysis of the wound fluid with swab culture and sensitivity.

For wound that have superficially dehisced, the wound surface area, depth, volume and healing progress will be precisely measured using the Silhouette® 3D camera. This is a system that uses 3D laser technology to track wound healing progression.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

All patients who have been referred to the Croydon University Hospital dedicated perineal clinic with perineal wound infection will be invited to participate.

You may qualify if:

  • Women with childbirth related perineal injury and wound infection
  • Women over 18 years of age
  • Ability to understand and read the patient information sheet (in English)
  • Ability to give informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Vulnerable Adult
  • Fetal or neonatal death or poor neonatal outcome
  • Women who are in an immunosuppressive state (e.g human immunodeficiency virus or pharmacologically induced immunodeficiencies by chemotherapy or steroids)
  • Inability to give consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Croydon University Hospital

London, CR7 7YE, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • McCandlish R, Bowler U, van Asten H, Berridge G, Winter C, Sames L, Garcia J, Renfrew M, Elbourne D. A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Dec;105(12):1262-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10004.x.

    PMID: 9883917BACKGROUND
  • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Methods and Materials used in Perineal repair, Guideline No 23. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Press; 2004.

    BACKGROUND
  • Thakar R, Fenner DE. Anatomy of the Perineum and the Anal Sphincter. In: Sultan AH, Thakar R, Fenner DE, editors. Perineal and Anal Sphincter Trauma: Diagnosis and Clinical Management [Internet]. London: Springer London; 2007. p. 1-12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-503-5_1

    BACKGROUND
  • Sultan AH. Obstetric Perineal Injury and Anal Incontinence. AVMA Medical & Legal Journal. 1999 Nov;5(6):193-6

    BACKGROUND
  • Webb S, Sherburn M, Ismail KM. Managing perineal trauma after childbirth. BMJ. 2014 Nov 25;349:g6829. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6829. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25425212BACKGROUND
  • Arendsen L, Thakar R, Sultan A. Can perineal wound infection following vagina delivery be reduced? A double blind randomised controlled trial using copper impregnated maternity sanitary towels. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2019 Mar;234:e180.

    BACKGROUND
  • Taithongchai A, van Gruting IMA, Volloyhaug I, Arendsen LP, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of 3 ultrasound modalities for diagnosing obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;221(2):134.e1-134.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

    PMID: 30981717BACKGROUND
  • European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Stockholm. Surgical site infections. In:ECDC. Annual epidemiological report for 2017. 2019.

    BACKGROUND
  • Sultan AH, Kamm MA. Faecal incontinence after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Sep;104(9):979-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12052.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 9307520BACKGROUND
  • National Healthcare Safety Network, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surgical site infection (SSI) event. [Internet]. 2017. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf.

    BACKGROUND
  • Eisenberg VH, Valsky DV, Yagel S. Transperineal ultrasound assessment of the anal sphincter after obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;53(2):158-165. doi: 10.1002/uog.19058. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29575180BACKGROUND
  • Okeahialam NA, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Bacterial autofluorescence in infected perineal wounds: A prospective cohort study. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023 Jan;105(1):115831. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115831. Epub 2022 Oct 8.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Abdul H Sultan, MB.ChB, MD, FRCOG

    Croydon Health Services NHS Trust

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2020

First Posted

July 21, 2020

Study Start

August 14, 2020

Primary Completion

August 14, 2021

Study Completion

August 14, 2021

Last Updated

September 16, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations