Comparison of Two Methods of Transnasal Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block
Comparison of Temperature and Pain Changes Between the Drip and Topical Methods of Administering the Transnasal Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block
1 other identifier
observational
74
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block(SPGB) is administered to patients with facial or head and neck pain. In the transnasal approach, the drip and topical methods are frequently used. We compared facial temperatures and VAS after transnasal SPGB.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Mar 2021
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 10, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2021
CompletedOctober 20, 2021
October 1, 2021
7 months
July 15, 2020
October 12, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Facial temperatures
Facial temeratures changes after transnasal SPGB
Before, and 30 minutes after completion of transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block
Visual analogue scale(VAS)
11 points pain scale score from 0 to 10
Before, and 30 minutes after completion of transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block
Study Arms (2)
Drip-method group
Transnasal SPGB was performed by a single pain clinician. After the patient was placed in a supine and neck-extended position, 2 mL of 2% mepivacaine was placed in a syringe connected to a 16-gauge Angiocath sheath. The sheath of the Angiocath was inserted through the nostril, and 2% mepivacaine was dripped into the nostrils with the patient in a supine position. The mepivacaine drip on the nasal pharynx was maintained for 10 min. A drip of 2% mepivacaine was delivered to the nostril, where the pain was dominant. In cases of bilateral pain, mepivacaine drip was administered to both nostrils.
Topical-method group
Transnasal SPGB was performed by a single pain clinician. The posture was the same as that in the drip method. A cotton tip applicator soaked with 2% mepivacaine was inserted vertically into the nostril. After the cotton tip applicator made contact with the posterior wall of the middle turbinate, the cotton tip applicator was fixed for 10 min. A cotton tip applicator was inserted into the nostril, where the pain was dominant. In cases of bilateral pain, two applicators were inserted into both nostrils.
Interventions
In transnasal approach, several authors described the traditional technique using sterile 10cm cotton tipped applicators that are dipped in the chosen anesthetic and then advanced along the superior border of the middle turbinate, until it reaches the posterior wall of the nasopharynx. Some other techniques had described dripping one or two ml of the anesthetics into the nostril.
Eligibility Criteria
The patients who visited pain clinic of Ajou university hospital, and a total of 74 patients who be performed transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block
You may qualify if:
- (1) age over 20 years ; (2) head and neck pain; (3) pain score \> 4 on the VAS in the head and neck; and (4) having undergone a transnasal SPGB and having had facial temperatures measured.
You may not qualify if:
- (1) patients with a history of head and neck surgery, (2) treatment with a vasodilator or vasoconstrictor, (3) contraindication to treatment using a transnasal approach, (4) clinically significant systemic disease or any reduced organ failure, and (5) missing data.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ajou University Hospital
Suwon, Gyunggi, 16499, South Korea
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Kim
Ajou University School of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 15, 2020
First Posted
July 21, 2020
Study Start
March 10, 2021
Primary Completion
October 1, 2021
Study Completion
October 1, 2021
Last Updated
October 20, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share