Transvaginal Mesh vs. Laparoscopic Colposacropexy- Study
TVM vs LCSP
Women's Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment - a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Transvaginal and Laparoscopic Mesh Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
318
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main objective of the study is to compare subjective efficacy of trans vaginal mesh and laparoscopic colposakropexy (CSP) in women with an apical prolapse. The CSP group is further divided into two sub-groups; one where the mesh fixation is only at the apical part of the vagina, and another where the fixation is also extended to the levator plane. The secondary outcomes are safety (peri- and post-surgery complications, pain, erosion), objective efficacy (simplified POP-Q), and re-operation rate. Subjective outcome also includes the assessment of sexual satisfaction. Cost-effectiveness is studied by comparing both direct costs and QALYs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 15, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2031
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2032
September 24, 2025
September 1, 2025
11.4 years
June 15, 2020
September 19, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Subjective success; defined as the absence of vaginal bulge
Negative response to PDFI-20, question 3, at one-year following the surgery
5 years
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Peri and post-operative complications
1 year
Post-operative pain
1 year
Objective efficacy
1 year
Re-operation rate
1 year
Cost-effectiveness
1 year
Study Arms (3)
Transvaginal mesh
ACTIVE COMPARATORBSC mesh (A.M.I., Feldkirch, Austria) is attached to the sacrospinosus ligaments and to the apical part of the vagina.
Colposacropexy with the apical fixation only
ACTIVE COMPARATOREndoGYNious (A.M.I.) CSP mesh is attached laparoscopically to the apical part of the vagina.
Colposacropexy with the apical and the levator fixation
ACTIVE COMPARATOREndoGYNious (A.M.I.) CSP mesh is attached laparoscopically to the apical part of the vagina with fixation reaching to the level of the levator planes.
Interventions
Transvaginal mesh operation using BSC mesh (A.M.I., Feldkirch, Austria)
Colposacropexy using EndoGYNious mesh (A.M.I., Feldkirch, Austria)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age over 18 years and capability to understand the study protocol either in Finnish or Swedish.
- Objectively diagnosed symptomatic apical prolapse (leading apical prolapse (points C/D) ≥ -2) and a history of previous POP operation including hysterectomy.
- No need for any other concomitant operations except colporrhaphies and possible prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy in CSP groups
You may not qualify if:
- A history of serious or prolonged pain after any operation or current or previous prolonged (over 6 months) pain of any reason.
- BMI over 40
- Regular use of systemic corticosteroid medication.
- Incapability to understand the study protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Helsinki Naistenklinikka
Helsinki, Finland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior consultant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2020
First Posted
July 21, 2020
Study Start
July 1, 2020
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2031
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2032
Last Updated
September 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share