Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) to Improve Assessment of Resection Margins in Invasive Breast Cancer
DBT
Optimal Imaging Methods to Reduce Repeat Surgery in Invasive Breast Cancer
1 other identifier
observational
250
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The challenge of breast conserving surgery (BCS) is to obtain free resection margins, by removing the invasive tumor and the precursor cells: DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma in Situ). Consequently, 17%-25% of primary invasive breast cancer patients will need a repeat surgery. Repeat breast surgery has been associated with higher surgical risks, poorer cosmetic outcome and increased psychological and economic burden. Finding a precise method to obtain tumor- and DCIS-free resection margins during BCS is therefore strongly needed. The purpose with this study is to investigate if the need for a re-operation can be reduced by performing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) of the resected tumor margins compared to the currently used standard X-ray during BCS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 17, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2022
CompletedFebruary 17, 2022
February 1, 2022
1.4 years
July 16, 2020
February 16, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Positive resection margin(s) in the final histopathology
The number of patients with one or more positive resection margins in the final histopathology.
7 workdays, time from primary breastconserving surgery to the time where the final histopathology result is available.
Re-excision-rate during primary breast conserving surgery
The number of patients that recieves further excision of the cavity wherefrom the breast tumor is resected, during the initial breast conserving surgery.
One workday, time from primary breastconserving surgery to the time where data of the re-excision of the cavity during same surgery is available in the patient electronical journal
Rate of repeat surgery
The number of patients that recieves a second or a third surgery due to insufficient resection margins during initial primary breast conserving surgery.
3 weeks from primary breastconserving surgery, depending on the final histopathology result.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Diagnostic performance of the tested method to predict correct resection margins status.
one year from primary breast conserving surgery, when the inclusion of all patients is final and the dataanalysis is ready.
Weight of the re-excised breast tumor during initial breast conserving surgery
One work day, The weight will be registered during the day the patient recieves primary breast conserving surgery and will be registered by the surgeon in the patient electronical journal.
Type of repeat surgery (both secondary and if any tertiar surgery)
3 weeks from the primary breastconserving surgery, depending on the final histopathology result and what type of repeat surgery the patient is planned to recieve
Eligibility Criteria
Study participants will be recruited at the Department of Plastic and Breast Surgery at Aarhus University Hospital after they have been diagnosed with operable invasive breast cancer and scheduled for breast conserving surgery.
You may qualify if:
- Newly diagnosed women with biopsy-verified invasive breast cancer planned for breast conserving surgery.
- Age \> 18 year
You may not qualify if:
- Previous surgery for pre-malignant or malignant lesions in the breast
- Planned mastectomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department og Plastic- and Breast Surgery
Aarhus, Danmark, 8200, Denmark
Related Publications (12)
Amiel CR, Fisher HM, Carver CS, Antoni MH. The importance of stress management among postresection breast cancer patients. Future Oncol. 2016 Dec;12(24):2771-2774. doi: 10.2217/fon-2016-0442. Epub 2016 Oct 19. No abstract available.
PMID: 27756150BACKGROUNDDeSnyder SM, Hunt KK, Dong W, Smith BD, Moran MS, Chavez-MacGregor M, Shen Y, Kuerer HM, Lucci A. American Society of Breast Surgeons' Practice Patterns After Publication of the SSO-ASTRO-ASCO DCIS Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(10):2965-2974. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6580-9. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
PMID: 29987598BACKGROUNDThill M, Baumann K, Barinoff J. Intraoperative assessment of margins in breast conservative surgery--still in use? J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul;110(1):15-20. doi: 10.1002/jso.23634. Epub 2014 May 24.
PMID: 24863286BACKGROUNDBodilsen A, Bjerre K, Offersen BV, Vahl P, Amby N, Dixon JM, Ejlertsen B, Overgaard J, Christiansen P. Importance of margin width in breast-conserving treatment of early breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2016 May;113(6):609-15. doi: 10.1002/jso.24224. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
PMID: 26991020RESULTSmitt MC, Nowels K, Carlson RW, Jeffrey SS. Predictors of reexcision findings and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Nov 15;57(4):979-85. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00740-5.
PMID: 14575828RESULTJeevan R, Cromwell DA, Trivella M, Lawrence G, Kearins O, Pereira J, Sheppard C, Caddy CM, van der Meulen JH. Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics. BMJ. 2012 Jul 12;345:e4505. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4505.
PMID: 22791786RESULTBodilsen A, Bjerre K, Offersen BV, Vahl P, Ejlertsen B, Overgaard J, Christiansen P. The Influence of Repeat Surgery and Residual Disease on Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3:S476-85. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4707-9. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
PMID: 26178760RESULTMcCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowles EJ, Feigelson HS, James TA, Barney T, Engel JM, Onitilo AA. Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):467-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.43.
PMID: 22298678RESULTHisada T, Sawaki M, Ishiguro J, Adachi Y, Kotani H, Yoshimura A, Hattori M, Yatabe Y, Iwata H. Impact of intraoperative specimen mammography on margins in breast-conserving surgery. Mol Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep;5(3):269-272. doi: 10.3892/mco.2016.948. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
PMID: 27588192RESULTRamos M, Diaz JC, Ramos T, Ruano R, Aparicio M, Sancho M, Gonzalez-Orus JM. Ultrasound-guided excision combined with intraoperative assessment of gross macroscopic margins decreases the rate of reoperations for non-palpable invasive breast cancer. Breast. 2013 Aug;22(4):520-4. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Oct 27.
PMID: 23110817RESULTMcClatchy DM 3rd, Zuurbier RA, Wells WA, Paulsen KD, Pogue BW. Micro-computed tomography enables rapid surgical margin assessment during breast conserving surgery (BCS): correlation of whole BCS micro-CT readings to final histopathology. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Dec;172(3):587-595. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4951-3. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
PMID: 30225621RESULTPark KU, Kuerer HM, Rauch GM, Leung JWT, Sahin AA, Wei W, Li Y, Black DM. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Intraoperative Margin Assessment during Breast-Conserving Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(6):1720-1728. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07226-w. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
PMID: 30877499RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peer Christiansen, DMSc, Prof.
Department of Plastic and Breast Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD student, radiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 16, 2020
First Posted
July 21, 2020
Study Start
September 17, 2020
Primary Completion
February 15, 2022
Study Completion
February 15, 2022
Last Updated
February 17, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02