NCT04478669

Brief Summary

The challenge of breast conserving surgery (BCS) is to obtain free resection margins, by removing the invasive tumor and the precursor cells: DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma in Situ). Consequently, 17%-25% of primary invasive breast cancer patients will need a repeat surgery. Repeat breast surgery has been associated with higher surgical risks, poorer cosmetic outcome and increased psychological and economic burden. Finding a precise method to obtain tumor- and DCIS-free resection margins during BCS is therefore strongly needed. The purpose with this study is to investigate if the need for a re-operation can be reduced by performing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) of the resected tumor margins compared to the currently used standard X-ray during BCS.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
250

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 16, 2020

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 21, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 17, 2020

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 15, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 15, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

February 17, 2022

Status Verified

February 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

July 16, 2020

Last Update Submit

February 16, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Digital breast tomosynthesisDiagnostic imaging

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Positive resection margin(s) in the final histopathology

    The number of patients with one or more positive resection margins in the final histopathology.

    7 workdays, time from primary breastconserving surgery to the time where the final histopathology result is available.

  • Re-excision-rate during primary breast conserving surgery

    The number of patients that recieves further excision of the cavity wherefrom the breast tumor is resected, during the initial breast conserving surgery.

    One workday, time from primary breastconserving surgery to the time where data of the re-excision of the cavity during same surgery is available in the patient electronical journal

  • Rate of repeat surgery

    The number of patients that recieves a second or a third surgery due to insufficient resection margins during initial primary breast conserving surgery.

    3 weeks from primary breastconserving surgery, depending on the final histopathology result.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Diagnostic performance of the tested method to predict correct resection margins status.

    one year from primary breast conserving surgery, when the inclusion of all patients is final and the dataanalysis is ready.

  • Weight of the re-excised breast tumor during initial breast conserving surgery

    One work day, The weight will be registered during the day the patient recieves primary breast conserving surgery and will be registered by the surgeon in the patient electronical journal.

  • Type of repeat surgery (both secondary and if any tertiar surgery)

    3 weeks from the primary breastconserving surgery, depending on the final histopathology result and what type of repeat surgery the patient is planned to recieve

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Study participants will be recruited at the Department of Plastic and Breast Surgery at Aarhus University Hospital after they have been diagnosed with operable invasive breast cancer and scheduled for breast conserving surgery.

You may qualify if:

  • Newly diagnosed women with biopsy-verified invasive breast cancer planned for breast conserving surgery.
  • Age \> 18 year

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous surgery for pre-malignant or malignant lesions in the breast
  • Planned mastectomy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department og Plastic- and Breast Surgery

Aarhus, Danmark, 8200, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Amiel CR, Fisher HM, Carver CS, Antoni MH. The importance of stress management among postresection breast cancer patients. Future Oncol. 2016 Dec;12(24):2771-2774. doi: 10.2217/fon-2016-0442. Epub 2016 Oct 19. No abstract available.

    PMID: 27756150BACKGROUND
  • DeSnyder SM, Hunt KK, Dong W, Smith BD, Moran MS, Chavez-MacGregor M, Shen Y, Kuerer HM, Lucci A. American Society of Breast Surgeons' Practice Patterns After Publication of the SSO-ASTRO-ASCO DCIS Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(10):2965-2974. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6580-9. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

    PMID: 29987598BACKGROUND
  • Thill M, Baumann K, Barinoff J. Intraoperative assessment of margins in breast conservative surgery--still in use? J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul;110(1):15-20. doi: 10.1002/jso.23634. Epub 2014 May 24.

    PMID: 24863286BACKGROUND
  • Bodilsen A, Bjerre K, Offersen BV, Vahl P, Amby N, Dixon JM, Ejlertsen B, Overgaard J, Christiansen P. Importance of margin width in breast-conserving treatment of early breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2016 May;113(6):609-15. doi: 10.1002/jso.24224. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

  • Smitt MC, Nowels K, Carlson RW, Jeffrey SS. Predictors of reexcision findings and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Nov 15;57(4):979-85. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00740-5.

  • Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Trivella M, Lawrence G, Kearins O, Pereira J, Sheppard C, Caddy CM, van der Meulen JH. Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics. BMJ. 2012 Jul 12;345:e4505. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4505.

  • Bodilsen A, Bjerre K, Offersen BV, Vahl P, Ejlertsen B, Overgaard J, Christiansen P. The Influence of Repeat Surgery and Residual Disease on Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3:S476-85. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4707-9. Epub 2015 Jul 16.

  • McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowles EJ, Feigelson HS, James TA, Barney T, Engel JM, Onitilo AA. Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):467-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.43.

  • Hisada T, Sawaki M, Ishiguro J, Adachi Y, Kotani H, Yoshimura A, Hattori M, Yatabe Y, Iwata H. Impact of intraoperative specimen mammography on margins in breast-conserving surgery. Mol Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep;5(3):269-272. doi: 10.3892/mco.2016.948. Epub 2016 Jul 4.

  • Ramos M, Diaz JC, Ramos T, Ruano R, Aparicio M, Sancho M, Gonzalez-Orus JM. Ultrasound-guided excision combined with intraoperative assessment of gross macroscopic margins decreases the rate of reoperations for non-palpable invasive breast cancer. Breast. 2013 Aug;22(4):520-4. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Oct 27.

  • McClatchy DM 3rd, Zuurbier RA, Wells WA, Paulsen KD, Pogue BW. Micro-computed tomography enables rapid surgical margin assessment during breast conserving surgery (BCS): correlation of whole BCS micro-CT readings to final histopathology. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Dec;172(3):587-595. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4951-3. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

  • Park KU, Kuerer HM, Rauch GM, Leung JWT, Sahin AA, Wei W, Li Y, Black DM. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Intraoperative Margin Assessment during Breast-Conserving Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(6):1720-1728. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07226-w. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Margins of Excision

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Morphological and Microscopic FindingsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Peer Christiansen, DMSc, Prof.

    Department of Plastic and Breast Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD student, radiologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2020

First Posted

July 21, 2020

Study Start

September 17, 2020

Primary Completion

February 15, 2022

Study Completion

February 15, 2022

Last Updated

February 17, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-02

Locations