Retrospective Review on Patients With Culture Negative Empyema
1 other identifier
observational
153
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Empyema is associated with a wide range of complication and mortality. It is defined by either a positive pleural fluid culture or grossly pus appearance. However, little is known about the differences in aetiology and outcome between culture-positive empyema (CPE) and culture-negative empyema (CNE). The aim of the current study is to look at the local prevalence of CNE, and compare the clinical outcome between CPE and CNE.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2018
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 3, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 29, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 20, 2020
CompletedJuly 20, 2020
July 1, 2020
1.8 years
June 28, 2020
July 15, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compare the mortality rate within same admission between patients with culture-positive empyema (CPE) and culture-negative empyema (CNE)
Compare the mortality rate within same admission between patients with culture-positive empyema (CPE) and culture-negative empyema (CNE)
Within the same episode of hospitalization or 7 days, whichever longer
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Prevalence of negative pleural fluid culture in patients with empyema
6 years
b. Compare other clinical outcomes (length of hospital stay, duration of intravenous antibiotics, number of pleural drainage received, need of surgical treatment, 30-days and 90-days mortality) between patients with CNE and CPE
Within the same episode of hospitalization or 90 days, whichever longer
Investigate the risk factors of failure to obtain culture results in patients with CNE
Within the same episode of hospitalization or 7 days, whichever longer
Study Arms (2)
Culture positive empyema
Patients with empyema confirmed by a positive pleural fluid culture, irrespective of its gross fluid appearance
Culture negative empyema
Patients with empyema confirmed by a gross pus appearance AND a negative pleural fluid culture
Interventions
Mortality rate between the two groups
Eligibility Criteria
A. By using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification code 510.0 or 510.9, all primary hospital discharge diagnosis of empyema during a 5 year period, between 1st January 2013 to 31st December 2018
You may qualify if:
- i. All patients hospitalized for empyema, defined by the presence of purulent pleural fluid or positive culture result from pleural fluid ii. Age greater than 18 years old
You may not qualify if:
- i. Inappropriate diagnosis of empyema after evaluation ii. Tuberculous pleuritis, defined by presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture from pleural fluid or granulomatous inflammation on pleural biopsy histology
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (12)
Light RW, Girard WM, Jenkinson SG, George RB. Parapneumonic effusions. Am J Med. 1980 Oct;69(4):507-12. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(80)90460-x.
PMID: 7424940BACKGROUNDChalmers JD, Singanayagam A, Murray MP, Scally C, Fawzi A, Hill AT. Risk factors for complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema on presentation to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia. Thorax. 2009 Jul;64(7):592-7. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.105080. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
PMID: 19131449BACKGROUNDTaryle DA, Potts DE, Sahn SA. The incidence and clinical correlates of parapneumonic effusions in pneumococcal pneumonia. Chest. 1978 Aug;74(2):170-3. doi: 10.1378/chest.74.2.170. No abstract available.
PMID: 679746BACKGROUNDDean NC, Griffith PP, Sorensen JS, McCauley L, Jones BE, Lee YC. Pleural Effusions at First ED Encounter Predict Worse Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Pneumonia. Chest. 2016 Jun;149(6):1509-15. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.12.027. Epub 2016 Jan 16.
PMID: 26836918BACKGROUNDKim J, Park JS, Cho YJ, Yoon HI, Lee JH, Lee CT, Lim HJ, Kim DK. Predictors of prolonged stay in patients with community-acquired pneumonia and complicated parapneumonic effusion. Respirology. 2016 Jan;21(1):164-71. doi: 10.1111/resp.12658. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
PMID: 26510382BACKGROUNDFerguson AD, Prescott RJ, Selkon JB, Watson D, Swinburn CR. The clinical course and management of thoracic empyema. QJM. 1996 Apr;89(4):285-9. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/89.4.285.
PMID: 8733515BACKGROUNDNiederman MS, Mandell LA, Anzueto A, Bass JB, Broughton WA, Campbell GD, Dean N, File T, Fine MJ, Gross PA, Martinez F, Marrie TJ, Plouffe JF, Ramirez J, Sarosi GA, Torres A, Wilson R, Yu VL; American Thoracic Society. Guidelines for the management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. Diagnosis, assessment of severity, antimicrobial therapy, and prevention. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Jun;163(7):1730-54. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.7.at1010. No abstract available.
PMID: 11401897BACKGROUNDTsang KY, Leung WS, Chan VL, Lin AW, Chu CM. Complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema thoracis: microbiology and predictors of adverse outcomes. Hong Kong Med J. 2007 Jun;13(3):178-86.
PMID: 17548905BACKGROUNDTu CY, Hsu WH, Hsia TC, Chen HJ, Chiu KL, Hang LW, Shih CM. The changing pathogens of complicated parapneumonic effusions or empyemas in a medical intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Apr;32(4):570-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-0064-7. Epub 2006 Feb 15.
PMID: 16479377BACKGROUNDLin YC, Chen HJ, Liu YH, Shih CM, Hsu WH, Tu CY. A 30-month experience of thoracic empyema in a tertiary hospital: emphasis on differing bacteriology and outcome between the medical intensive care unit (MICU) and medical ward. South Med J. 2008 May;101(5):484-9. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31816c00fa.
PMID: 18414163BACKGROUNDLindstrom ST, Kolbe J. Community acquired parapneumonic thoracic empyema: predictors of outcome. Respirology. 1999 Jun;4(2):173-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1843.1999.00170.x.
PMID: 10382237BACKGROUNDChen KC, Chen HY, Lin JW, Tseng YT, Kuo SW, Huang PM, Hsu HH, Lee JM, Chen JS, Lai HS. Acute thoracic empyema: clinical characteristics and outcome analysis of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. J Formos Med Assoc. 2014 Apr;113(4):210-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
PMID: 24512757BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ka Pang Chan, MBChB
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Honorary Clinical Tutor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 28, 2020
First Posted
July 20, 2020
Study Start
May 3, 2018
Primary Completion
February 29, 2020
Study Completion
May 31, 2020
Last Updated
July 20, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Starting 6 months after publication
- Access Criteria
- upon individual approach for metaanalysis or related study
all IPD that underlie results in a publication