NCT04477980

Brief Summary

Empyema is associated with a wide range of complication and mortality. It is defined by either a positive pleural fluid culture or grossly pus appearance. However, little is known about the differences in aetiology and outcome between culture-positive empyema (CPE) and culture-negative empyema (CNE). The aim of the current study is to look at the local prevalence of CNE, and compare the clinical outcome between CPE and CNE.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
153

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2018

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 3, 2018

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 29, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 31, 2020

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 28, 2020

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 20, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

July 20, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

June 28, 2020

Last Update Submit

July 15, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Culture positive empyemaCulture negative empyemaParapneumonic effusionPleural fluidPneumonia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Compare the mortality rate within same admission between patients with culture-positive empyema (CPE) and culture-negative empyema (CNE)

    Compare the mortality rate within same admission between patients with culture-positive empyema (CPE) and culture-negative empyema (CNE)

    Within the same episode of hospitalization or 7 days, whichever longer

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Prevalence of negative pleural fluid culture in patients with empyema

    6 years

  • b. Compare other clinical outcomes (length of hospital stay, duration of intravenous antibiotics, number of pleural drainage received, need of surgical treatment, 30-days and 90-days mortality) between patients with CNE and CPE

    Within the same episode of hospitalization or 90 days, whichever longer

  • Investigate the risk factors of failure to obtain culture results in patients with CNE

    Within the same episode of hospitalization or 7 days, whichever longer

Study Arms (2)

Culture positive empyema

Patients with empyema confirmed by a positive pleural fluid culture, irrespective of its gross fluid appearance

Other: Disease outcome (mortality)

Culture negative empyema

Patients with empyema confirmed by a gross pus appearance AND a negative pleural fluid culture

Other: Disease outcome (mortality)

Interventions

Mortality rate between the two groups

Culture negative empyemaCulture positive empyema

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

A. By using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification code 510.0 or 510.9, all primary hospital discharge diagnosis of empyema during a 5 year period, between 1st January 2013 to 31st December 2018

You may qualify if:

  • i. All patients hospitalized for empyema, defined by the presence of purulent pleural fluid or positive culture result from pleural fluid ii. Age greater than 18 years old

You may not qualify if:

  • i. Inappropriate diagnosis of empyema after evaluation ii. Tuberculous pleuritis, defined by presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture from pleural fluid or granulomatous inflammation on pleural biopsy histology

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Light RW, Girard WM, Jenkinson SG, George RB. Parapneumonic effusions. Am J Med. 1980 Oct;69(4):507-12. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(80)90460-x.

    PMID: 7424940BACKGROUND
  • Chalmers JD, Singanayagam A, Murray MP, Scally C, Fawzi A, Hill AT. Risk factors for complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema on presentation to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia. Thorax. 2009 Jul;64(7):592-7. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.105080. Epub 2009 Jan 8.

    PMID: 19131449BACKGROUND
  • Taryle DA, Potts DE, Sahn SA. The incidence and clinical correlates of parapneumonic effusions in pneumococcal pneumonia. Chest. 1978 Aug;74(2):170-3. doi: 10.1378/chest.74.2.170. No abstract available.

    PMID: 679746BACKGROUND
  • Dean NC, Griffith PP, Sorensen JS, McCauley L, Jones BE, Lee YC. Pleural Effusions at First ED Encounter Predict Worse Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Pneumonia. Chest. 2016 Jun;149(6):1509-15. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.12.027. Epub 2016 Jan 16.

    PMID: 26836918BACKGROUND
  • Kim J, Park JS, Cho YJ, Yoon HI, Lee JH, Lee CT, Lim HJ, Kim DK. Predictors of prolonged stay in patients with community-acquired pneumonia and complicated parapneumonic effusion. Respirology. 2016 Jan;21(1):164-71. doi: 10.1111/resp.12658. Epub 2015 Oct 29.

    PMID: 26510382BACKGROUND
  • Ferguson AD, Prescott RJ, Selkon JB, Watson D, Swinburn CR. The clinical course and management of thoracic empyema. QJM. 1996 Apr;89(4):285-9. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/89.4.285.

    PMID: 8733515BACKGROUND
  • Niederman MS, Mandell LA, Anzueto A, Bass JB, Broughton WA, Campbell GD, Dean N, File T, Fine MJ, Gross PA, Martinez F, Marrie TJ, Plouffe JF, Ramirez J, Sarosi GA, Torres A, Wilson R, Yu VL; American Thoracic Society. Guidelines for the management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. Diagnosis, assessment of severity, antimicrobial therapy, and prevention. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Jun;163(7):1730-54. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.7.at1010. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11401897BACKGROUND
  • Tsang KY, Leung WS, Chan VL, Lin AW, Chu CM. Complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema thoracis: microbiology and predictors of adverse outcomes. Hong Kong Med J. 2007 Jun;13(3):178-86.

    PMID: 17548905BACKGROUND
  • Tu CY, Hsu WH, Hsia TC, Chen HJ, Chiu KL, Hang LW, Shih CM. The changing pathogens of complicated parapneumonic effusions or empyemas in a medical intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Apr;32(4):570-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-0064-7. Epub 2006 Feb 15.

    PMID: 16479377BACKGROUND
  • Lin YC, Chen HJ, Liu YH, Shih CM, Hsu WH, Tu CY. A 30-month experience of thoracic empyema in a tertiary hospital: emphasis on differing bacteriology and outcome between the medical intensive care unit (MICU) and medical ward. South Med J. 2008 May;101(5):484-9. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31816c00fa.

    PMID: 18414163BACKGROUND
  • Lindstrom ST, Kolbe J. Community acquired parapneumonic thoracic empyema: predictors of outcome. Respirology. 1999 Jun;4(2):173-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1843.1999.00170.x.

    PMID: 10382237BACKGROUND
  • Chen KC, Chen HY, Lin JW, Tseng YT, Kuo SW, Huang PM, Hsu HH, Lee JM, Chen JS, Lai HS. Acute thoracic empyema: clinical characteristics and outcome analysis of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. J Formos Med Assoc. 2014 Apr;113(4):210-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Feb 7.

    PMID: 24512757BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Empyema, PleuralPneumonia

Interventions

Mortality

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract InfectionsInfectionsEmpyemaSuppurationPleural DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsLung Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vital StatisticsData CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesDemographyPopulation CharacteristicsEpidemiologic MeasurementsPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Ka Pang Chan, MBChB

    Chinese University of Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Honorary Clinical Tutor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2020

First Posted

July 20, 2020

Study Start

May 3, 2018

Primary Completion

February 29, 2020

Study Completion

May 31, 2020

Last Updated

July 20, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

all IPD that underlie results in a publication

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Starting 6 months after publication
Access Criteria
upon individual approach for metaanalysis or related study

Locations