Anesthetic Efficacy of %4Alexadricaine Versus %2 Mepicaine-L in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the present study is to evaluate and compare the anesthetic efficacy of Alexadricaine versus Mepecaine-L infiltration anesthesia in children during extraction of badly decayed or unrestorable maxillary first primary molars.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Aug 2021
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 13, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2021
CompletedMarch 14, 2023
March 1, 2023
2 months
July 13, 2020
March 11, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intra-operative pain during extraction
measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Sound Eye Motor (SEM) scale
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
onset of anesthesia
through study completion, an average of 1 year
duration of anesthesia
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Experimental
EXPERIMENTAL4% Articaine Hydrochloride with 1:100,000 Adrenaline (Alexadricaine, Alexandria Co., Egypt).
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATOR2% Mepivacaine Hydrochloride with 1:20,000 Levonordefrin (Mepicaine-L, Alexandria Co., Egypt)
Interventions
new Egyptian articane anesthetic solution.
Mepecaine-L is the brand name of the Egyptian 2% Mepivacaine. It is the most commonly used anesthetic solution in Egypt due to its availability and its lower cost.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Medically fit (ASA I, II).
- Mentally capable of communication.
- Children aged 5-7 years, children older than 8 years old will not be included due to physiologic root resorption associated with shedding which may simplify the extraction procedure(25).
- First maxillary primary molar needs extraction due to root caries "beyond possible repair".
- First dental visit.
- Child must give assent prior to participation, as well as approved parental informed written consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Children with acute or sub-acute dento-alveolar abscess Children with history of prolonged bleeding, platelet disorders, Hyperthyroidism or hypersensitivity.
- Patients who had taken analgesics or antibiotics in the 12-hrs preceding the injection.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of dentistry cairo university
Cairo, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sara A mahmoud, Assoc. Prof.
Cairo University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2020
First Posted
July 20, 2020
Study Start
August 1, 2021
Primary Completion
September 30, 2021
Study Completion
October 30, 2021
Last Updated
March 14, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03