NCT04474574

Brief Summary

In clinical practice discrepancies between overnight SpO2 recordings performed by 2 devices used simultaneously are regularly observed. However, this has not been systematically studied or quantified. It is therefore important to determine if these discrepancies are anecdotic, or frequent, and to what extent this may affect decisions in clinical practice such as implementing (or withdrawing) oxygen in subjects under noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), or adjusting NIV settings.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2023

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 13, 2020

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 17, 2020

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2023

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 30, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 30, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

January 22, 2025

Status Verified

January 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

July 13, 2020

Last Update Submit

January 18, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Degree of agreement

    The primary endpoint is the degree of agreement between 3 different devices used simultaneously for overnight SpO2 recording for 3 commonly used threshold values defining nocturnal hypoxemia: 5% of time with an SpO2 \< 88%, 10% of time with an SpO2 \< 90% or 20% of time with an SpO2 \< 90%.

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Bland and Altman analysis of agreement

    3 months

  • Degree of agreement with threshold values

    3 months

  • Minimal SpO2 value

    3 months

  • Mean pulse rate

    3 months

Interventions

The intervention will consist in performing a simultaneous recording of nocturnal SpO2 and pulse rate for at least 4 hours with 3 different devices.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Participants will be recruited among 1) hospitalized patients with NIV treatment; 2) ambulatory patients followed for NIV therapy at the outpatient unit of the Division of Pulmonology; 3) patients undergoing an elective polysomnography (sleep study) for adjustment or titration of a positive pressure device (NIV or CPAP) at the Sleep Laboratory of the Division of Pulmonology.

You may qualify if:

  • \> 18 years old
  • Awake room air SpO2 between 90 and 94%
  • NIV or CPAP therapy
  • Ambulatory or hospitalized patient in a clinically stable respiratory condition without any vasopressor treatment.

You may not qualify if:

  • Hospitalization in an acute care setting (e.g. emergency room, Intensive Care Unit, Intermediate Care Unit)
  • Any vasopressor treatment
  • Peripheral vascular pathologies that can affect digital perfusion (e.g. history of ischemia, Raynaud's phenomenon, any type of vasculitis).
  • Mechanical obstacles that may limit quality of signal (e.g. nail polish, bandage, splint, plaster).
  • Patient already treated by long term nocturnal oxygen therapy (LTOT)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Geneva University Hospital

Geneva, 1205, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Karege G, Egger B, Lawi D, Bergeron A, Janssens JP. How Using Different Oximeters May Affect Clinical Decision-Making: A Method Comparison Study in Patients Receiving CPAP or Noninvasive Ventilation. Chest. 2026 Jan;169(1):244-256. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2025.08.018. Epub 2025 Sep 9.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sleep Apnea SyndromesHypoventilation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ApneaRespiration DisordersRespiratory Tract DiseasesSleep Disorders, IntrinsicDyssomniasSleep Wake DisordersNervous System DiseasesRespiratory InsufficiencySigns and Symptoms, RespiratorySigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2020

First Posted

July 17, 2020

Study Start

July 1, 2023

Primary Completion

October 30, 2023

Study Completion

October 30, 2023

Last Updated

January 22, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-01

Locations