Comparison of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Application and Classic Nasal Cannula Oxygen Application
Comparison of the Efficiency of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Application and Classic Nasal Cannula Oxygen Application in Pediatric Patients With Sedation for Gastrointestinal System Endoscopy
1 other identifier
observational
82
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Recently, sedation practices have increased for diagnostic and interventional procedures for children in non-operating rooms. On the other hand, the rate of respiratory complications especially in non-operating room sedation applications is quite high. Oxygen therapy in sedation applied to non-operating room endoscopy patients is mostly performed with classical nasal cannula. However, recently, the use of High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy has been increasing. According to the classical nasal cannula oxygen therapy application where non-moistened oxygen is applied in high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy applications where heated and humidified oxygen can be delivered, oxygen therapy can be applied at a flow rate of 25L / min. This method has many advantages. Some of those; makes it possible to provide high flows easily, prevents the airway epithelium from drying out and improves mucus cleansing, causing a decrease in anatomical dead space. It provides discharge of expired air in the upper airways. It reduces the respiration of gas with high CO2 and decreased O2. It increases alveolar ventilation. It is easy to use and increases patient comfort. It offers a stream adjusted to all children. Flow and titration can be adjusted according to the child's weight and effect. Physiological evidence in the pediatric population indicates that flows equal to or higher than 2 L / kg / min produce clinically significant pharyngeal pressure, improve breathing and accelerate the emptying of the respiratory muscles. Because of all these features, high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy application is used safely in pediatric patients. In general, it is reported that in non-operating room anesthesia, sedation or anesthesia applied in pediatric patients causes undesirable effects by 20%, most of them (5.5%) have respiratory complications and bradycardia due to hypoxemia. In this study, we aimed to compare the respiratory and hemodynamic results of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen application, which is routinely used in sedation applications in the pediatric endoscopy unit of our hospital, with the classical nasal cannula oxygen therapy application.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Feb 2020
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 27, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 15, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2021
CompletedJuly 15, 2020
July 1, 2020
7 months
June 16, 2020
July 11, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of the effects of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen administration and nasal cannula oxygen administration on respiratory parameters in patients undergoing sedation in the pediatric endoscopy unit.
SpO2 and ETCO2 are recorded as data in patients in high-flow nasal cannula and classical nasal cannula oxygen therapy applications.
SpO2 values of patients at admission, 1 minute, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes and 20 minutes will be recorded. After the procedure, SpO2 and ETCO2 values at the input, 1 minute, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes and 20 minutes will be recorded.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of the effects of high flow nasal cannula oxygen administration and nasal cannula oxygen administration on hemodynamic parameters in patients undergoing sedation in the pediatric endoscopy unit.
HR and blood pressure values of patients at admission, 1 minute, 5 minutes, 10 minutes 15 minutes and 20 minutes will be recorded. After the procedure, HR values at the input, 1 minute, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes and 20 minutes will be recorded.
Study Arms (2)
high-flow nasal cannula group
Group 1
classic nasal cannula group
Group 2
Interventions
The oxygen given with nasal cannula cannot be humidified, causing drying in mucous membranes at high flow rates of more than 4L/min and problems in patient compliance.This situation prevents us to increase the oxygen FiO2 rate applied to the patient above 40%.According to the nasal cannula high-flow nasal cannula where heated and humidified oxygen can be delivered, oxygen therapy can be applied at a flow rate of 25L/min.It provides high flows easily, prevents the airway epithelium from drying out and improves mucus cleansing, causing a decrease in anatomical dead space.It provides discharge of expired air in the upper airways.It increases alveolar ventilation.It offers a stream adjusted to all children.Flow and titration can be adjusted according to the child's weight and effect.
Eligibility Criteria
Children of 4-18 years of age, whose informed consent is signed by their parents.
You may qualify if:
- Children aged 4-18 years
- Patients undergoing gastroenterological intervention
- Patients undergoing sedation
- Patients with ASA 1-2 risk group
- Patients who have been informed of the study for informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients under 4 years old and over 18 years old
- Patients with ASA 3 and above risk groups
- Patients who refuse to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sami Olcay OZBAY
Kocaeli, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mehmet YILMAZ
Assistant Professor
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, RESİDENT
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2020
First Posted
July 15, 2020
Study Start
February 27, 2020
Primary Completion
October 1, 2020
Study Completion
February 1, 2021
Last Updated
July 15, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07