NCT04471181

Brief Summary

This will be a non-randomized, prospective, observational multi-center research study. Its purpose will be to assess the mortality and outcome of EVAR in patients with rAAA. As mentioned in the introduction, EVAR approach for ruptured bdominal aortic aneurysms is nowdays common clinical practice in many vascular centers , and the main treatment option in Hippokrateio General hospital. The same applies in all future participating vascular centers.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
157

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2020

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2020

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 5, 2020

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 15, 2020

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2022

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

August 26, 2021

Status Verified

August 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

July 5, 2020

Last Update Submit

August 25, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Ruptured Abdominal Aortic AneurysmEndovascular Repair

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mortality Rate

    Any cause mortality after EVAR

    30 days

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Time from rupture to diagnosis

    pre-intervention

  • Time from diagnosis to intervention

    pre-intervention

  • Rate of procedures converted to open repair

    24 hours post-operatively

  • Total mortality rate

    12 months post-operatively

  • Rate of Major Adverse Events (MAE)

    30 days, 3 months and 12 months

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

All patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

All patients will undergo CTA to confirm the diagnosis. The use of balloon for aortic clamp in case of haemodynamic instability can be used. All patients included in the research study must undergo standard EVAR with a bifurcated graft or an aorto-uni-iliac and a femoral to femoral crossover. In aneurysms with short proximal neck down to 4mm, or in cases where completion angiography indicates type Ia endoleak, the Heli-FX EndoAnchor system is recommended to be used, as indicated. All patients will have plain abdominal x-rays on discharge. Participants will undergo CTA in 3months and annually post-op.. In case of an adverse event before the 3 months follow up CTA, a more urgent imaging might be requested and proceed to appropriate action according to the findings.

Device: Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) with Medtronic Endurant

Interventions

Endovascular repair (EVAR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms with Medtronic Endurant II, and IIs device

All patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

All consecutive alive patients with true ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm and anatomic suitability for EVAR

You may qualify if:

  • All alive patients admitted with rAAA and have anatomic suitability for EVAR according to manufacturer's IFU. More accurately the anatomic criteria for the research study are :
  • Neck diameter \>17mm, \< 32mm
  • Angle between the suprarenal aorta and the juxtarenal aorta \<60 degrees
  • Angle between the juxtarenal aorta and the long axis of the aneurysm sac \<90 degrees
  • Neck length \>10mm
  • Neck length \<10mm down to 4mm with Heli-FX EndoAnchor system
  • Adequate aortic bifurcation diameter in case of a bifurcated graft
  • Bilateral Iliac luminal diameter \>7mm
  • AAA rupture will be confirmed and defined with computed tomography angiography (CTA). Rupture will be rated as free intraperitoneal rupture (free rupture), definite contrast extravasation and haematoma around the aorta (retroperitoneal rupture) and haematoma surrounding the aorta without definite contrast leak (contained rupture)

You may not qualify if:

  • Symptomatic non ruptured AAAs will not be included even when treated as emergencies. Thoracoabdominal aneurysms and aortic dissections will also be excluded from the research study. Juxtarenal ruptured AAA treated with standard EVAR without chimney technique, outside IFU will also be excluded from the research study.However all consecutive rAAAs in the participating centers will be collected in a screening CRF to understand if this relates to rEVAR applicability.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ippokrateio General Hospital

Thessaloniki, Macedonia, 54642, Greece

RECRUITING

Related Publications (17)

  • IMPROVE Trial Investigators; Powell JT, Sweeting MJ, Thompson MM, Ashleigh R, Bell R, Gomes M, Greenhalgh RM, Grieve R, Heatley F, Hinchliffe RJ, Thompson SG, Ulug P. Endovascular or open repair strategy for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 30 day outcomes from IMPROVE randomised trial. BMJ. 2014 Jan 13;348:f7661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f7661.

    PMID: 24418950BACKGROUND
  • Hinchliffe RJ, Bruijstens L, MacSweeney ST, Braithwaite BD. A randomised trial of endovascular and open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm - results of a pilot study and lessons learned for future studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006 Nov;32(5):506-13; discussion 514-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.05.016. Epub 2006 Aug 1.

    PMID: 16887369BACKGROUND
  • Reimerink JJ, Hoornweg LL, Vahl AC, Wisselink W, van den Broek TA, Legemate DA, Reekers JA, Balm R; Amsterdam Acute Aneurysm Trial Collaborators. Endovascular repair versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2013 Aug;258(2):248-56. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828d4b76.

    PMID: 23549424BACKGROUND
  • Desgranges P, Kobeiter H, Katsahian S, Bouffi M, Gouny P, Favre JP, Alsac JM, Sobocinski J, Julia P, Alimi Y, Steinmetz E, Haulon S, Alric P, Canaud L, Castier Y, Jean-Baptiste E, Hassen-Khodja R, Lermusiaux P, Feugier P, Destrieux-Garnier L, Charles-Nelson A, Marzelle J, Majewski M, Bourmaud A, Becquemin JP; ECAR Investigators. Editor's Choice - ECAR (Endovasculaire ou Chirurgie dans les Anevrysmes aorto-iliaques Rompus): A French Randomized Controlled Trial of Endovascular Versus Open Surgical Repair of Ruptured Aorto-iliac Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;50(3):303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.03.028. Epub 2015 May 20.

    PMID: 26001320BACKGROUND
  • van Beek SC, Conijn AP, Koelemay MJ, Balm R. Editor's Choice - Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair for patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term survival. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Jun;47(6):593-602. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

    PMID: 24746873BACKGROUND
  • Sweeting MJ, Balm R, Desgranges P, Ulug P, Powell JT; Ruptured Aneurysm Trialists. Individual-patient meta-analysis of three randomized trials comparing endovascular versus open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2015 Sep;102(10):1229-39. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9852. Epub 2015 Jun 24.

    PMID: 26104471BACKGROUND
  • Karthikesalingam A, Holt PJ, Vidal-Diez A, Ozdemir BA, Poloniecki JD, Hinchliffe RJ, Thompson MM. Mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: clinical lessons from a comparison of outcomes in England and the USA. Lancet. 2014 Mar 15;383(9921):963-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60109-4.

    PMID: 24629298BACKGROUND
  • Karthikesalingam A, Wanhainen A, Holt PJ, Vidal-Diez A, Brownrigg JR, Shpitser I, Bjorck M, Thompson MM, Mani K. Comparison of long-term mortality after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in England and Sweden. Br J Surg. 2016 Feb;103(3):199-206. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10049. Epub 2015 Dec 1.

    PMID: 26620854BACKGROUND
  • Vogel TR, Dombrovskiy VY, Haser PB, Graham AM. Has the implementation of EVAR for ruptured AAA improved outcomes? Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2009 Jun-Jul;43(3):252-7. doi: 10.1177/1538574408329271. Epub 2009 Jan 8.

    PMID: 19131375BACKGROUND
  • Veith FJ, Lachat M, Mayer D, Malina M, Holst J, Mehta M, Verhoeven EL, Larzon T, Gennai S, Coppi G, Lipsitz EC, Gargiulo NJ, van der Vliet JA, Blankensteijn J, Buth J, Lee WA, Biasi G, Deleo G, Kasirajan K, Moore R, Soong CV, Cayne NS, Farber MA, Raithel D, Greenberg RK, van Sambeek MR, Brunkwall JS, Rockman CB, Hinchliffe RJ; RAAA Investigators. Collected world and single center experience with endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):818-24. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bdd7f5.

    PMID: 19809296BACKGROUND
  • Papazoglou K, Mallios A, Rafati F, Zambas N, Karkos C. Endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms with the Endurant device. Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;27(2):162-7. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.04.013. Epub 2012 Sep 12.

    PMID: 22981014BACKGROUND
  • Donas KP, Torsello GB, Piccoli G, Pitoulias GA, Torsello GF, Bisdas T, Austermann M, Gasparini D. The PROTAGORAS study to evaluate the performance of the Endurant stent graft for patients with pararenal pathologic processes treated by the chimney/snorkel endovascular technique. J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jan;63(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.080. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

    PMID: 26476671BACKGROUND
  • Mayer D, Aeschbacher S, Pfammatter T, Veith FJ, Norgren L, Magnuson A, Rancic Z, Lachat M, Horer T, Skoog P, Larzon T. Complete replacement of open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms by endovascular aneurysm repair: a two-center 14-year experience. Ann Surg. 2012 Nov;256(5):688-95; discussion 695-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318271cebd.

    PMID: 23095611BACKGROUND
  • Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL, White GH, Zarins CK, Bernhard VM, Matsumura JS, May J, Veith FJ, Fillinger MF, Rutherford RB, Kent KC; Ad Hoc Committee for Standardized Reporting Practices in Vascular Surgery of The Society for Vascular Surgery/American Association for Vascular Surgery. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002 May;35(5):1048-60. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.123763. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12021727BACKGROUND
  • Vu KN, Kaitoukov Y, Morin-Roy F, Kauffmann C, Giroux MF, Therasse E, Soulez G, Tang A. Rupture signs on computed tomography, treatment, and outcome of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Insights Imaging. 2014 Jun;5(3):281-93. doi: 10.1007/s13244-014-0327-3. Epub 2014 May 1.

    PMID: 24789068BACKGROUND
  • Mell MW, Starnes BW, Kraiss LW, Schneider PA, Pevec WC. Western Vascular Society guidelines for transfer of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;65(3):603-608. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.10.097.

    PMID: 28236914BACKGROUND
  • Anjum A, von Allmen R, Greenhalgh R, Powell JT. Explaining the decrease in mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Br J Surg. 2012 May;99(5):637-45. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8698.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Aortic RuptureAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalAneurysm, Ruptured

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AneurysmVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesAortic AneurysmAortic DiseasesRuptureWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Kostantinos Papazoglou, Professor

    Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Kostantinos Papazoglou, Professor

CONTACT

Ioakeim Giagtzidis, Consultant

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor in Vascular surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2020

First Posted

July 15, 2020

Study Start

February 1, 2020

Primary Completion

February 1, 2022

Study Completion

February 1, 2023

Last Updated

August 26, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All IPD data that underlie results in a publication will be released by the end of the study

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
By the end of the study, until publication
Access Criteria
GDPR compatible

Locations