Clip Marker Placement in Primary Lesions of Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy
Ultra3Detect
Prospective, Multicenter Registry Study Evaluating the Feasibility of Ultrasound-guided Clipping of Suspicious Intramammary Lesions in Primary Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy (Ultra3Detect)
1 other identifier
observational
339
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is increasingly recommended for patients with early breast cancer, and the rate of patients with pathological complete remission (pCR) is increasing due to the use of modern chemotherapy regimens and targeted therapies, especially in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). It is therefore important to mark a lesion (with e.g. clip) before the start of NST in order to safely identify and localize a clip and (former) tumor bed after completion of NST. Reliable sonographic detection of the clip would be preferred to mammography-guided detection and marking. In addition to avoiding radiation exposure by mammography and reducing time, personnel and financial expenditure, ultrasound-guided wire marking of the clip is less painful for the patient than stereotactic wire marking. The present prospective registry study aims to evaluate how often the intramammary Tumark® Vision clip can be detected by ultrasound after completion of NST in patients with TNBC and HER2+ breast cancer and thus, in the case of pCR, how often the elaborate clipping with mammographic (stereotactic) guidance can be avoided.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2020
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 14, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2023
CompletedNovember 24, 2023
November 1, 2023
2.9 years
June 23, 2020
November 22, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sonographic detection rate of clip at the time of surgery after completion of NST
Intraoperative detection rate of the clip in patients with HER2+ breast cancer or TNBC after at least 12 weeks of NST treatment
At the time of surgery
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Number of ultrasound-guided clip placements per patient
Immediately after placement of clip
Rate of successful clip placements in the tumor center
Immediately after placement of clip
Visibility of the device (Tumark® Vision) cannula
During placement of clip
Complications associated with the application of the clip
Up to 6 months after placement of clip
Sonographic detection rate of clips in patients receiving NST
Immediately after placement of clip as well as after 4-8, 9-12, 13-26 weeks of NST treatment and preoperatively
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
US-guided core biopsy and clip placement
Female patients with sonographically suspicious, intramammary foci, scheduled for ultrasound-guided core biopsy and marking of the lesion with the Tumark® Vision Clip
Interventions
Suspicious intramammary lesion is marked with clip
Eligibility Criteria
Female patients with sonographically suspicious unilateral or bilateral intramammary foci, scheduled for sonography-guided core biopsy and marking of the lesion with the Tumark® Vision Clip.
You may qualify if:
- female patient aged ≥ 18 years
- written informed consent
- patient's consent to NST
- suspicious unilateral or bilateral intramammary foci that can be safely identified by ultrasound
- indication for breast conserving therapy
- no prior clip placement in the confirmed intramammary carcinoma
- patient is able to undergo NST treatment (even if the indication based on tumor biology is not yet available)
- high compliance and high number of planned relevant surgical interventions in participating study center
- patient can understand the scope of this prospective registry study
You may not qualify if:
- allergy to titanium and/or nickel
- pregnancy
- prior extensive breast surgery (starting from quadrant resection)
- inflammatory breast cancer
- extramammary breast cancer
- multicentric or multifocal breast cancer
- patient is not operable
- patient is already undergoing adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy
- inability to understand the purpose of the clinical trial or to comply with study procedures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Interdisciplinary Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte
Essen, 45136, Germany
Related Publications (4)
Ruland AM, Hagemann F, Reinisch M, Holtschmidt J, Kummel A, Dittmer-Grabowski C, Stoblen F, Rotthaus H, Dreesmann V, Blohmer JU, Kummel S. Using a New Marker Clip System in Breast Cancer: Tumark Vision(R) Clip - Feasibility Testing in Everyday Clinical Practice. Breast Care (Basel). 2018 Apr;13(2):116-120. doi: 10.1159/000486388. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
PMID: 29887788BACKGROUNDHurvitz SA, Martin M, Symmans WF, Jung KH, Huang CS, Thompson AM, Harbeck N, Valero V, Stroyakovskiy D, Wildiers H, Campone M, Boileau JF, Beckmann MW, Afenjar K, Fresco R, Helms HJ, Xu J, Lin YG, Sparano J, Slamon D. Neoadjuvant trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and chemotherapy versus trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (KRISTINE): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):115-126. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30716-7. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
PMID: 29175149BACKGROUNDvon Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, Eidtmann H, Fasching PA, Gerber B, Eiermann W, Hilfrich J, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kaufmann M, Konecny GE, Denkert C, Nekljudova V, Mehta K, Loibl S. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1796-804. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8595. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
PMID: 22508812BACKGROUNDShah AD, Mehta AK, Talati N, Brem R, Margolies LR. Breast tissue markers: Why? What's out there? How do I choose? Clin Imaging. 2018 Nov-Dec;52:123-136. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
PMID: 30059952BACKGROUND
Biospecimen
Formalin fixed tissue from routine histopathology assessment
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sherko Kuemmel, MD, PhD
Interdisciplinary Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Germany
- STUDY CHAIR
Mattea Reinisch, MD
Interdisciplinary Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Germany
- STUDY CHAIR
Jörg Heil, MD, PhD
Department of Gynecology, Breast Center, Heidelberg University, Germany
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2020
First Posted
July 13, 2020
Study Start
May 14, 2020
Primary Completion
March 30, 2023
Study Completion
July 30, 2023
Last Updated
November 24, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share